POV-Ray : Newsgroups : povray.binaries.images : blub Server Time
14 Aug 2024 09:22:37 EDT (-0400)
  blub (Message 11 to 12 of 12)  
<<< Previous 10 Messages Goto Initial 10 Messages
From: Doctor John
Subject: Re: blub
Date: 5 Dec 2002 11:30:08
Message: <web.3def7e76ee99c354b29393de0@news.povray.org>
Roz wrote:

>What I think it's been doing is calculating the trace time for the
>hours/minutes/seconds part based on how long the POV-Ray render window
>stays open.

Yup, after testing I'm going with your explanation.
Ah well, it was fun thinking about the possibilities.

John
--

Run Fast
Run Free
Run Linux


Post a reply to this message

From: Dennis Clarke
Subject: Re: blub
Date: 11 Dec 2002 21:49:38
Message: <3DF7F85F.FA8338B4@interlog.com>
Doctor John wrote:
> 
> Rafal 'Raf256' Maj wrote:
> >"Apache" <apa### [at] yahoocom> wrote in
> >news:3dec0a34[at]news.povray.org
> >
> >> Time For Trace:   14 hours 12 minutes  27.0 seconds (50902 seconds)
> >>     Total Time:   14 hours  8 minutes  22.0 seconds (50902 seconds)
> >
> >How fast was Yours computer moving while rendering ;) ?
> >
> I'm glad I'm not the only one getting weird time estimates. Until now I
> assumed it was because there was something broken in my compile.
> Now I know the true reason - I'm moving at 96.657463% of c!
> For my next trick I will send a copy of a few other weird stats files
> yesterday. ;-)
> 
> John
> --
> 
> Run Fast
> Run Free
> Run Linux

Run Fast
Run Free
Run Solaris


Post a reply to this message

<<< Previous 10 Messages Goto Initial 10 Messages

Copyright 2003-2023 Persistence of Vision Raytracer Pty. Ltd.