 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Chris Colefax wrote:
> No media, no layered planes, 3.1/3.5 compatible, fully animateable,
> automatic sun-shading, parameters for lighting, softness, smoothness,
> height, flatness, turbulence - and very quick to render!
Amazing... and incredible! Now tell us it is free and open! :)
P.S.: Please, explain it... I can't really concentrate to work with this
suspense...
--
Jaime Vives Piqueres
http://www.ignorancia.org/
La Persistencia de la Ignorancia
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Absolutely excellent work.
One question: Is it possible to make the outlines (at the top) slightly less
sharp?
All the best,
Andy Cocker
"Chris Colefax" <chr### [at] tag povrayorg> wrote in message
news:3cabba71@news.povray.org...
> No media, no layered planes, 3.1/3.5 compatible, fully animateable,
> automatic sun-shading, parameters for lighting, softness, smoothness,
> height, flatness, turbulence - and very quick to render!
>
>
>
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Thu, 4 Apr 2002 12:29:12 +1000, Chris Colefax wrote:
> No media, no layered planes, 3.1/3.5 compatible, fully animateable,
> automatic sun-shading, parameters for lighting, softness, smoothness,
> height, flatness, turbulence - and very quick to render!
That looks great Chris, blobs perhaps? I'll certainly be downloading
the macro when it's available.
--
%HAV-A-NICEDAY email mailto:ste### [at] zeroppsuklinuxnet
Steve web http://www.zeropps.uklinux.net/
or http://start.at/zero-pps
11:03am up 29 days, 12:02, 1 user, load average: 1.00, 1.03, 1.00
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> On Thu, 4 Apr 2002 12:29:12 +1000, Chris Colefax wrote:
> > No media, no layered planes, 3.1/3.5 compatible, fully animateable,
> > automatic sun-shading, parameters for lighting, softness, smoothness,
> > height, flatness, turbulence - and very quick to render!
AWESOME ROLEX!
It's a photography... probably made with a numerical apparatus.
But it perfectly fit the description.
1st of April is already so far away...
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Yummy!!!!!
--
Apache
http://geitenkaas.dns2go.com/experiments/
apa### [at] yahoocom
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
I've never liked clowns. Probably I even disliked clowns before I was born.
In my opinion clowns are tragic (self-pitying morons) or they are scary and
weird.
According to some people I'm a clown myself :-(
ahhahaha.
--
Apache
http://geitenkaas.dns2go.com/experiments/
apa### [at] yahoocom
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
This has got to be some kind of complex pigment function.
The clouds look very nice.
-Shay
Chris Colefax <chr### [at] tagpovrayorg> wrote in message
news:3cabba71@news.povray.org...
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
This looks interesting!
When saying fully animatable, does that include flying around the clouds?
Going from below them to above them? Flying through a cloud?
Is there also a parameter for density? The clouds look a bit heavy/solid for
my likings...
Anyway, I look forward to learn more about this.
Rune
--
3D images and anims, include files, tutorials and more:
Rune's World: http://rsj.mobilixnet.dk (updated Mar 19)
POV-Ray Users: http://rsj.mobilixnet.dk/povrayusers/
POV-Ray Ring: http://webring.povray.co.uk
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
My Master... Your clouds are excellent, but can they be made a bit softer
around the edges? Also would they happen to be a texture on a single plane
or sphere?
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Chris Colefax" wrote:
> No media, no layered planes, 3.1/3.5 compatible, fully animateable,
> automatic sun-shading, parameters for lighting, softness, smoothness,
> height, flatness, turbulence - and very quick to render!
Yessir, of course, I believe you... And I am "da greatest superhero coming from space
to defeat da Evil"...
<j/k> looks great.
--
Jonathan.
Home: http://digilander.iol.it/jrgpov
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
