From: Kevin Loney
Subject: Rubix cube revisited
Date: 3 Mar 2002 00:31:37
Message: <3c81b539@news.povray.org>
I started work on this last november and never got around to making it look
half decent. The recent teachers strike however has given time to do a lot
of things. I think the one thing that has to change is te relectiveness of
the suraface
it's sitting on.
--
Kevin
http://www.geocities.com/qsquared_1999/
From: Mark Hanford
Subject: Re: Rubix cube revisited
Date: 3 Mar 2002 03:54:58
Message: <3c81e4e2@news.povray.org>
It's looking good... the focal blur is a bit extreme though...
--
Mark Hanford
http://www.mrhanford.com/povray
"Kevin Loney" <klo### [at] pt2mcom> wrote in message
news:3c81b539@news.povray.org...
> I started work on this last november and never got around to making it
look
> half decent. The recent teachers strike however has given time to do a lot> of things. I think the one thing that has to change is te relectiveness of> the suraface> it's sitting on.>> --> Kevin> http://www.geocities.com/qsquared_1999/>>>>>
Very nice. A bubble in one of the stickers would really nail the realism.
Does this model operate?
-Shay
"Kevin Loney" <klo### [at] pt2mcom> wrote in message
news:3c81b539@news.povray.org...
Very nice. As noted, the focal blur does not look right. Could well be a
bit extreme, but it could also indicate how POVRay 'simulation' of focal
blur has its limits.
Hershel
From: David Fontaine
Subject: Re: Rubix cube revisited
Date: 3 Mar 2002 22:21:55
Message: <3C82E973.9B701145@faricy.net>
That is no Rubiks Cube. A Rubiks Cube has red opposite orange. ;)
--
David Fontaine <dav### [at] faricynet> ICQ 55354965
My raytracing gallery: http://davidf.faricy.net/
com> wrote in message
news: