![](/i/fill.gif) |
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
In article <3c640b90$1@news.povray.org>, sch### [at] surfeu at says...
> The "one strong lightsource" is also called "the sun".
No. That picture was (very probably) taken with a flash, and thats why it
looks so plastic-like: because of light directly from the front.
Not only in renders a good lighting is important, its the same in RL
photography...
Lutz-Peter
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
> Hi there,
>
> I found this fern pic on the net. If one would make a POV scene like this
> everyone (including myself) would say that it looks too much like plastic
> *lol*
> In fact this is a pic of a real fern. No fake :-)
>
> Nature is fun, isn't it?
> regards
> SY
>
> PS: sorry for posting a NONraytraced pic...
Ich glaub nicht jeder hat diesen Text gelesen...
I thought, a few people didn't read this text...
Stefan
--
www.weinzierl-stefan.de
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
> Ich glaub nicht jeder hat diesen Text gelesen...
Exakt. Was mich doch etwas wundert. Kommentare ohne vorher zu lesen?
> I thought, a few people didn't read this text...
Indeed, and I wonder why? Commenting without reading?
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
> No. That picture was (very probably) taken with a flash, and thats why it
> looks so plastic-like: because of light directly from the front.
>
> Not only in renders a good lighting is important, its the same in RL
> photography...
Yep. But tuning radiosity isn't easy for taking photos :-)
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
>>I thought, a few people didn't read this text...
>>
> Indeed, and I wonder why? Commenting without reading?
It's just like Playboy: everybody says they read it for the articles,
but all they do is look at the pictures ;-)
/Ib
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
> It's just like Playboy: everybody says they read it for the articles,
> but all they do is look at the pictures ;-)
*ROTFL*
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |