"fabien" <fab### [at] skynetbe> wrote in message
news:3c555ff9@news.povray.org...
> > IMAGE A was hand-coded in pov.
> ...
> > IMAGE B was modeled in 3DMax and rendered in brice.
>
> So it's easy : image A wins !
> Fabien.

I didn't want that to be a factor, but I know you were just kidding.

Thank you for voting.

 -Shay

Post a reply to this message

"Mitchell Waite" <mit### [at] dnaicom> wrote in message
news:3c54b88a@news.povray.org...
> Its a little unfair to compare them since B is so small its hard to see
the
> detail and A is easy to see, even minus the textures.

Unfortunately, both images lost a lot of detail. This is inexperience on the
part of myself and my friend.

 -Shay

Post a reply to this message

"Thomas Lake" <tla### [at] homecom> wrote in message
news:3c549cb1$1@news.povray.org...
that is some nice work for hand coding!
>

I will take your comment as a challenge. My new goal is to make an image
about which the last three words will not be said.

Thank you for voting.

 -Shay

Post a reply to this message

"Hugo" <hua### [at] post3teledk> wrote in message
news:3c549814$1@news.povray.org...
I start with detailed and well thought over sketches on paper.. So
> I'm a little envy to see that you just used a few hours >
 Hugo
>
>

I hope I did not give the wrong impression. We did use weeks to create the
images. I spent almost 20 hours on mine, mostly writing macros. We started
on Jan 1.

Regarding envy, I am very envious of you for being able to sketch. I can
hardly draw a smiley face!


Thank you for voting.

 -Shay

Post a reply to this message

> I will take your comment as a challenge. My new goal is to make an image
> about which the last three words will not be said.

?? I don't get it. When I said that is nice work for hand coding I didn't
mean there was an even more impressive way to go about it, I meant that was
really good work ESPECIALLY considering it is hand coded.

Post a reply to this message

Thomas Lake <tla### [at] homecom> wrote in message
news:3c57161c$1@news.povray.org...
>
> ?? I don't get it. When I said that is nice work for hand coding I didn't
> mean there was an even more impressive way to go about it, I meant that
was
> really good work ESPECIALLY considering it is hand coded.


I understand what you meant. My comment was meant to be a little bit
houmorous. Guess I failed.

Post a reply to this message