![](/i/fill.gif) |
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
I think the orange leaves give it an Autumn-like appearance.
I changed some things, I think now is more realistic. What do you think?
Fernando.
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'FallTree.jpg' (174 KB)
Preview of image 'FallTree.jpg'
![FallTree.jpg](/povray.binaries.images/attachment/%3C3c1cd42b%40news.povray.org%3E/FallTree.jpg?ttop=443840&toff=10000&preview=1)
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
news:3c1cd42b@news.povray.org...
> I think the orange leaves give it an Autumn-like appearance.
>
> I changed some things, I think now is more realistic. What do you think?
It is much more realistic. The diminishment of the radius of the trunks
is much better.
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
"Bill DeWitt" <bde### [at] cfl rr com> wrote in message
news:3c1ce8b3@news.povray.org...
>
> news:3c1cd42b@news.povray.org...
> > I think the orange leaves give it an Autumn-like appearance.
> >
> > I changed some things, I think now is more realistic. What do you think?
>
> It is much more realistic. The diminishment of the radius of the
trunks
> is much better.
Thanks. I'm still trying with more combinations because there are many
tweakable parameters involved. Only one little change results in a very
different tree.
Thanks for the comments.
Fernando.
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
>
> I think the orange leaves give it an Autumn-like appearance.
>
> I changed some things, I think now is more realistic. What do you think?
>
This already looks quite good, but some randomness in the growth
directions would probably be good (the single segments look fairly
straight).
On the other hand the leafs look a bit too random, their orientation
should have more regularity IMO.
Christoph
--
Christoph Hormann <chr### [at] gmx de>
IsoWood include, radiosity tutorial, TransSkin and other
things on: http://www.schunter.etc.tu-bs.de/~chris/
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
Yes it is starting to shape up. I love trees like this with their tangled
branches.
As has been already mentioned, the new stopping point is the lack of
knarledness in the branches.
I find the sky distracting btw, it seems too saturated and the cloud pattern
a little too regular.
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
"Jim Charter" <jrc### [at] aol com> wrote in message
news:3C1E7F2B.5BB22688@aol.com...
>
>
> Yes it is starting to shape up. I love trees like this with their tangled
> branches.
> As has been already mentioned, the new stopping point is the lack of
> knarledness in the branches.
>
> I find the sky distracting btw, it seems too saturated and the cloud
pattern
> a little too regular.
I agree, I don't like the sky either, but it's the best one I found in
textures.inc and I really was mainly concentrating in the tree.
Unfortunately some new duties appeared today, so I might not be able to
continue playing with POV for a while... :(
Thanks for your comments,
Fernando.
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
"Christoph Hormann" <chr### [at] gmx de> wrote in message
news:3C1E66C7.7655377E@gmx.de...
>
>
> >
> > I think the orange leaves give it an Autumn-like appearance.
> >
> > I changed some things, I think now is more realistic. What do you think?
> >
>
> This already looks quite good, but some randomness in the growth
> directions would probably be good (the single segments look fairly
> straight).
>
> On the other hand the leafs look a bit too random, their orientation
> should have more regularity IMO.
Hi Christoph. As (think) I mentioned before, my algorithm increases the
randomness each time the branches go to a higher level. I agree, maybe
there's a need for more randomness at the beginning (the trunk) and less
randomness at the end (the leaves). I'm getting busy on these days, so I may
not find the time to play with this soon... :/
Thanks for your comments,
Fernando.
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |