![](/i/fill.gif) |
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
Hi
Just playing around with a bit of radiosity. There is no detail yet within
the image, this will come later. This is my initial test scene to see how
the lighting looks. There are no light sources used in this image.
Comments Please.
Davey B
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'radiosity_office.jpg' (45 KB)
Preview of image 'radiosity_office.jpg'
![radiosity_office.jpg](/povray.binaries.images/attachment/%3C3c1c9322%40news.povray.org%3E/radiosity_office.jpg?ttop=443840&toff=10000&preview=1)
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
What is the large white place in the wall? If a window to outside it seems
way oversaturated and yet there doesn't seem to be lighting related with it.
Does the ceiling have artificial lights or is that daylight through
skylights?
Has a good radiosity look to it already.
--
text{ttf"arial","bob h",.1,0pigment{rgb 9}translate<-1,-.2,3>}
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
Hello Bob
> What is the large white place in the wall? If a window to outside it seems
> way oversaturated and yet there doesn't seem to be lighting related with
it.
It is a window. I agree it does look a little oversaturated, but, if I
reduce the ambient light it does not cast enough light into the room (it
does affect the lighting of the room btw) I will reduce it and see though.
> Does the ceiling have artificial lights or is that daylight through
> skylights?
They are artificial lights in the ceiling.
> Has a good radiosity look to it already.
Thanks
Davey B
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
Hello again Bob
I think this is a great improvement.
What do you think?
Davey B
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'radiosity_office.jpg' (46 KB)
Preview of image 'radiosity_office.jpg'
![radiosity_office.jpg](/povray.binaries.images/attachment/%3C3c1cad55%40news.povray.org%3E/radiosity_office.jpg?ttop=443840&toff=10000&preview=1)
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
I cannot help myself, the metal and the concrete parts seem to have an
ambient value greater than zero.
Ceiling structure is very convincing.
A good beginning.
Norbert
"Davey B" <kryten@*NOSPAM*totalise.co.uk> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
news:3c1c9322@news.povray.org...
> Hi
>
> Just playing around with a bit of radiosity. There is no detail yet within
> the image, this will come later. This is my initial test scene to see how
> the lighting looks. There are no light sources used in this image.
>
> Comments Please.
>
> Davey B
>
>
>
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
Hello Norbert
> I cannot help myself, the metal and the concrete parts seem to have an
> ambient value greater than zero.
They had an ambient value of 0.1 but I have reduced this to 0.03 and the
result seems a lot more realistic. Will post a new piccie very shortly.
>ceiling structure is very convincing.
> A good beginning.
Thank you very much.
Davey B
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |