|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
I suspect, although I can't tell for sure since I don't have 3D glasses,
that you're not changing your look_at point between the frames. Instead of
just moving the camera's location, you should *translate* the camera for the
second of the two shots you take, over to one direction or the other just a
bit. Otherwise the image can look incorrect way behind the look_at point.
I may be wrong about the way you did it; sorry if I am.
- Slime
[ http://www.slimeland.com/ ]
[ http://www.slimeland.com/images/ ]
"JMZ" <Kze### [at] Wanadoo fr> wrote in message
news:3bdf2746@news.povray.org...
> Just another anaglyphic variation.
>
> JMZ (France)
>
>
>
>
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
JMZ wrote:
>
Looks cool, but I think you may have the blue and red the wrong way
round, on the 3 pairs of glasses I have, I had to put them on backwards
to see the 3D effect.
Cheers, Alex.
,-._|\ Alex McMurray
/ Oz \ ale### [at] melbpc org au Melbourne PC User Group.
\_,--.x/ Melton. Vic. 3337 Australia
v
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |