POV-Ray : Newsgroups : povray.binaries.images : More candles...(85 kb) Server Time
17 Aug 2024 14:21:13 EDT (-0400)
  More candles...(85 kb) (Message 11 to 13 of 13)  
<<< Previous 10 Messages Goto Initial 10 Messages
From: Bob H 
Subject: Re: More candles...(85 kb)
Date: 15 Oct 2001 15:34:40
Message: <3bcb3a50$1@news.povray.org>
"JRG" <jrg### [at] hotmailcom> wrote in message
news:3bc9f7f6@news.povray.org...
> Bob, you wrote:
>
> >Might the refraction be causing the bright/dim midpoints of the
> > candles?  It just looks like a gradient with slight turbulence though.
>
> Blob artifacts I think. I'll try sturm solver next time.

Seems you might have thought I meant the streams of blobs.  Was talking
about what the others have brought up too.

Bob H.


Post a reply to this message

From: JRG
Subject: Re: More candles...(85 kb)
Date: 15 Oct 2001 15:45:30
Message: <3bcb3cda@news.povray.org>
I was dozing off when I heard Bob H. saying:
> "JRG" <jrg### [at] hotmailcom> wrote in message
> news:3bc9f7f6@news.povray.org...
> > Bob, you wrote:
> >
> > >Might the refraction be causing the bright/dim midpoints of the
> > > candles?  It just looks like a gradient with slight turbulence though.
> >
> > Blob artifacts I think. I'll try sturm solver next time.
>
> Seems you might have thought I meant the streams of blobs.  Was talking
> about what the others have brought up too.

Nope. I completely understood you.
Without rad. and with sturm I cannot notice those artifacts anymore.

--
Jonathan.


Post a reply to this message

From: Redbeard (MDJohnson)
Subject: Re: More candles...(85 kb)
Date: 20 Oct 2001 11:25:53
Message: <3bd19781$1@news.povray.org>
"JRG" <jrg### [at] hotmailcom> wrote in message news:3bc9e6cd@news.povray.org...
> No big changes. I just lowered transmit to 0.6 and added double_illuminate
> to both the candles. I also added an IOR of 1.1 to the wax. The scene is
> just for testing wax' behaviour in more complex scenes. This scene was meant
> to be rendered with focal_blur, but 10 pps at the first lines (where there
> are no objects...) was too slow for me. Radiosity used. Render time: 3h 49m
> 5s.
> Forgot to say that a third candle was put behind the camera.
>
> Comments?
>
>

Amazing!  I love the candles, and the candle holder texture is marvelous.  The
table's not bad either.  Ok... I like everything except the glass...  it looks a
little rough.

Michael

--
#macro M(D)#local J=strlen(D);#local _=""#while(J>0)#local _=concat(_,substr(D
,J,1))#local J=J-1;#end _#end sphere{z*9,5pigment{rgb x}}#macro N(D,J)text{ttf
"timrom.ttf"M(D)1,0 translate-J}#end#macro O(E,K)#local _=N(E,K)light_source{-
z*9rgb 1projected_through{_}}#end O("leahciM"<1.6,-.3.9>)O("nosnhoJ"<1.6.9.9>)


Post a reply to this message

<<< Previous 10 Messages Goto Initial 10 Messages

Copyright 2003-2023 Persistence of Vision Raytracer Pty. Ltd.