POV-Ray : Newsgroups : povray.binaries.images : 3.5 Polo (First Scene) Server Time
17 Aug 2024 22:18:40 EDT (-0400)
  3.5 Polo (First Scene) (Message 11 to 20 of 25)  
<<< Previous 10 Messages Goto Latest 10 Messages Next 5 Messages >>>
From: Peter Cracknell
Subject: Re: 3.5 Polo (First Scene)
Date: 9 Sep 2001 07:01:43
Message: <3b9b4c17$1@news.povray.org>
"Jamie Davison" <jam### [at] ntlworldcom> wrote in message
news:MPG.1604a692ce13c7c39899f0@news.povray.org...
> On Sat, 8 Sep 2001 21:20:24 +0200, AC wrote...
> > Looks like candy to me, (Lifesavers if I rememer corectly.)
>
> They are a UK brand of mints.  Probably peppermints since I can't see the
> blue/green specks that mark the spearmint versions.
>
> I'm not sure exactly what Lifesavers are, so I can't comment on any
> similarity that there may be.  IIRC, Polo's were originally available in
> Peppermint and clear boiled sweet varieties, but they've now released all
> sorts of stupid, and in some cases, disgusting flavours :)

Yeah they're the classic mint version.  Lifesavers are if I can remember IMO
a tacky polo rip-off (though they may have been around longer for all I
know) from the US - I don't think they compare.....

Peter Cracknell


Post a reply to this message

From: Andy Cocker
Subject: Re: 3.5 Polo (First Scene)
Date: 9 Sep 2001 13:03:47
Message: <3b9ba0f3$1@news.povray.org>
"Peter Cracknell" <pc### [at] lineonenet> wrote in message
news:3b9b4b74@news.povray.org...
>
> :) Thats about right - they taste OK but always appear a bit 'skanky'.

lol.. you from Manchester Peter?

Andy Cocker


Post a reply to this message

From: Steve
Subject: Re: 3.5 Polo (First Scene)
Date: 9 Sep 2001 13:29:03
Message: <slrn9pm7ar.4sm.steve@zero-pps.localdomain>
On Sat, 08 Sep 2001 17:56:43 -0700, Jon A. Cruz wrote:
>Jamie Davison wrote:
>
>> I'm not sure exactly what Lifesavers are, so I can't comment on any
>> similarity that there may be.
>
>LifeSavers are candy here in the US with magical properties!
>http://www.candystand.com/LifeSavers/ls_info.htm?
>http://www.candystand.com/home.htm?
>
>Magic!
>http://www.towson.edu/~sweeting/wg/candywww.htm
>
>And Pixar made nice (award winning) commercials when they introduced Gummi
>versions:
>http://www.pixar.com/funstuff/commercials.html
>
>Here are some strange ones:
>http://www.unimaxsupply.com/jlry/1acces/lifesavers/1life1.htm
>

Wonder if Uncle Joe's Mint Balls have a website, they've got 
mystical/magical qualities too. 

--
Cheers
Steve              email mailto:ste### [at] zeroppsuklinuxnet

%HAV-A-NICEDAY Error not enough coffee  0 pps. 

web http://www.zeropps.uklinux.net/

or  http://start.at/zero-pps

  8:40am  up 57 days, 10:46,  2 users,  load average: 1.10, 1.09, 1.03


Post a reply to this message

From: Peter Cracknell
Subject: Re: 3.5 Polo (First Scene)
Date: 9 Sep 2001 14:05:47
Message: <3b9baf7b@news.povray.org>
"Andy Cocker" <big### [at] mariner9fsnetcouk> wrote in message
news:3b9ba0f3$1@news.povray.org...
>
> "Peter Cracknell" <pc### [at] lineonenet> wrote in message
> news:3b9b4b74@news.povray.org...
> >
> > :) Thats about right - they taste OK but always appear a bit 'skanky'.
>
> lol.. you from Manchester Peter?

lol :) no I'm actually from Surrey (no posh jokes please) - I'm pretty sure
'skanky' is a very English word thinking on it - I don't think I've ever
heard it in any US films/tv.

Peter Cracknell


Post a reply to this message

From: Ken
Subject: Re: 3.5 Polo (First Scene)
Date: 9 Sep 2001 14:35:22
Message: <3B9BB754.A33755A5@pacbell.net>
Peter Cracknell wrote:

> lol :) no I'm actually from Surrey (no posh jokes please) - I'm pretty sure
> 'skanky' is a very English word thinking on it - I don't think I've ever
> heard it in any US films/tv.

I have heard the word, though infrequently.

-- 
Ken Tyler


Post a reply to this message

From: Bill DeWitt
Subject: Re: 3.5 Polo (First Scene)
Date: 9 Sep 2001 19:11:33
Message: <3b9bf725@news.povray.org>
"Peter Cracknell" <pc### [at] lineonenet> wrote in message
news:3b9baf7b@news.povray.org...
> "Andy Cocker" <big### [at] mariner9fsnetcouk> wrote in message
> news:3b9ba0f3$1@news.povray.org...
> >
> > "Peter Cracknell" <pc### [at] lineonenet> wrote in message
> > news:3b9b4b74@news.povray.org...
> > >
> > > :) Thats about right - they taste OK but always appear a bit 'skanky'.
> >
> > lol.. you from Manchester Peter?
>
> lol :) no I'm actually from Surrey (no posh jokes please) - I'm pretty
sure
> 'skanky' is a very English word thinking on it - I don't think I've ever
> heard it in any US films/tv.

    We have the same word, I don't think it has the same meaning. It is most
often used to modify a word describing streetwalkers. It refers to a
disgusting uncleanlyness.


Post a reply to this message

From: Jon A  Cruz
Subject: Re: 3.5 Polo (First Scene)
Date: 9 Sep 2001 20:39:51
Message: <3B9C0BC2.AAA5C83@geocities.com>
Bill DeWitt wrote:

> It refers to a disgusting uncleanlyness.

Ohhh. Very well put.

--
Wind the Frog!


Post a reply to this message

From: Tom Melly
Subject: Re: 3.5 Polo (First Scene)
Date: 10 Sep 2001 12:21:48
Message: <3b9ce89c@news.povray.org>
"Bill DeWitt" <bde### [at] cflrrcom> wrote in message
news:3b9bf725@news.povray.org...
> >
> > 'skanky' is a very English word thinking on it - I don't think I've ever
> > heard it in any US films/tv.
>
>     We have the same word, I don't think it has the same meaning. It is most
> often used to modify a word describing streetwalkers. It refers to a
> disgusting uncleanlyness.
>

Peter Tosh sings about "Easy Skanking" - I've always assumed it was a dope ref.


Post a reply to this message

From: Bill DeWitt
Subject: Re: 3.5 Polo (First Scene)
Date: 10 Sep 2001 13:04:22
Message: <3b9cf296@news.povray.org>
"Tom Melly" <tom### [at] tomandlucouk> wrote :
>
> Peter Tosh sings about "Easy Skanking" - I've always assumed it was a dope
ref.

    Since I don't know who Tosh is and I am not up on drug slang, I cannot
verify this.


Post a reply to this message

From: Peter Cracknell
Subject: Re: 3.5 Polo (First Scene)
Date: 10 Sep 2001 15:38:42
Message: <3b9d16c2@news.povray.org>
"Bill DeWitt" <bde### [at] cflrrcom> wrote in message
news:3b9bf725@news.povray.org...
>     We have the same word, I don't think it has the same meaning. It is
most
> often used to modify a word describing streetwalkers. It refers to a
> disgusting uncleanlyness.

'Skanky' in British Teenager speak means to be unclean - so I think it has
the pretty much same meaning.

"A 'Pike' would live in a 'Skanky' house"

Peter Cracknell


Post a reply to this message

<<< Previous 10 Messages Goto Latest 10 Messages Next 5 Messages >>>

Copyright 2003-2023 Persistence of Vision Raytracer Pty. Ltd.