 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Like the subject says...
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'trout.jpg' (56 KB)
Preview of image 'trout.jpg'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Ya, ya, very nice, whatever... source please!
Just kidding :-)
One of the most beautiful images ever posted. Thank you!
Of course if you felt like posting source... :-)
"Mike Hough" <Ama### [at] aol com> wrote in message
news:3b7bb419@news.povray.org...
> Like the subject says...
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Nice water, and the trout's not bad, either... ;-)
Seriously, is there any chance of you posting the source code for the
water ?
--
Scott Hill.
Software Engineer.
E-Mail : sco### [at] innocentcom
Pandora's Box : http://www.pandora-software.com
*Everything in this message/post is purely IMHO and no-one-else's*
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
The fish is really well done, almost life-like, almost
Leitha
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Man, that's good! Only thing to peck at would be the shadow.. you
should use orient and circular in the area light.
sig
--
ICQ 74734588
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
OK, I give up. I am going back to spheres on a plane.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Makes me hungry.
Mike Hough <Ama### [at] aolcom> wrote in message
news:3b7bb419@news.povray.org...
> Like the subject says...
>
>
>
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
That trout looks almost AWESOME!
Is it a heightfield with an image map?
--
/* Nekar Xenos */#local N=<-20,40,100>;#local K=<20,-40,100>;#local R=seed(0);
blob{#while((K-N).x>0)#local X=N;#local N=N+<rand(R),rand(R),1>/3;#local N=(
vlength(N-K)<vlength(X-K)?N:2*X-N);sphere{<N.y,-N.x,N.z>,1,1 scale .02}sphere{N
,1,1 scale.02}sphere{<-N.x-40,N.y,N.z>1,1 scale.01}sphere{<N.x+40,-N.y,N.z>1,1
scale.01 }#end pigment{rgbt 1}interior{media{emission <2,4,5>*5}}hollow}
"Mike Hough" <Ama### [at] aolcom> wrote in message
news:3b7bb419@news.povray.org...
> Like the subject says...
>
>
>
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Get the fishing tackle!
That's excellent. I'm thinking it's missing something in the texture
somehow, but I might be thinking of reflection as seen above water.
I'd hate to have been the one to unwrap the skin off that fish for the scan.
Bob H.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Yum!
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Thu, 16 Aug 2001 06:45:17 -0500, Mike Hough wrote:
>Like the subject says...
>
I'm no fish expert but the texturing looks excelent.
--
Cheers
Steve email mailto:ste### [at] zeroppsuklinuxnet
%HAV-A-NICEDAY Error not enough coffee 0 pps.
web http://www.zeropps.uklinux.net/
or http://start.at/zero-pps
10:54pm up 34 days, 58 min, 2 users, load average: 1.10, 1.12, 1.05
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> Seriously, is there any chance of you posting the source code for the
> water ?
Posted to p.t.s-f
It's pretty much a box with a bumpy texture on top and photons.
-Mike
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> Is it a heightfield with an image map?
Now that would be an impressive feat! Nah, it's a patch model created in
Animation Master and exported to POV.
-Mike
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> Makes me hungry.
I knew it was done when the only thing missing was some butter and lemon. :)
-Mike
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Mike Hough" <Ama### [at] aolcom> wrote in message
news:3b7c43b3@news.povray.org...
> > Seriously, is there any chance of you posting the source code for
the
> > water ?
>
> Posted to p.t.s-f
>
Cheers.
> It's pretty much a box with a bumpy texture on top and photons.
>
Oh, yes, I see, ah, and fog... Ooh, and 'clock' - does it animate well ?
Ach, I'll find out for myself...
--
Scott Hill.
Software Engineer.
E-Mail : sco### [at] innocentcom
Pandora's Box : http://www.pandora-software.com
*Everything in this message/post is purely IMHO and no-one-else's*
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
You bass-tar...! <faint> <awake> How dare you be so good?! Tell us more...
:)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Bob H." wrote:
snip...
> That's excellent. I'm thinking it's missing something in the texture
snip...
The fishes scales.
Ken Matassa
--
+-----------------------------------------+
| If I can't see it, it can't get me! |
+-----------------------------------------+
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> > That's excellent. I'm thinking it's missing something in the texture
> snip...
>
> The fishes scales.
>
> Ken Matassa
>
Trout & Salmon have scales that really don't show up like other fish ...
it's much more like skin and very smooth, esp on a small fish and they
certainly aren't visible like on other species and very difficult to see
when in the water.
This render looks very realistic to me . . . outstanding.
--
Y
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Tony[B]" <ben### [at] catholicorg> wrote in message
news:3b7c5f48@news.povray.org...
[snip]
OH Yeah. Hey everybody break out the tartare sauce and gather round...go on
dont be shy... gather round.
Marc
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Oh urg, and here I was about to go aghast at my
switching over to AM for my animation with your trout
here and I see you used AM as well... hehe... Well,
back to BPMF for me...
BTW: Beautiful texturing job on the trout.
-peter
--
http://www.users.qwest.net/~dearmad
Why bother? I'm not interesting.
But... maybe "Ballet pour ma fille" will be.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Tony[B]" wrote:
>
> You bass-tar...! <faint> <awake> How dare you be so good?! Tell us more...
> :)
For a modeling tool that is fantastic for organic
shapes such as this (and indeed used for this one)
check out: http://www.hash.com You'll find that a fish
shape like this is something you can do in about ten
minutes- the TEXTURING OTOH is where the real work
lies...
-peter
--
http://www.users.qwest.net/~dearmad
Why bother? I'm not interesting.
But... maybe "Ballet pour ma fille" will be.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
It took longer than 10 minutes to model. It took some time to work in the
details around the mouth and gills. It's like that with AM, you can get the
general look down real fast but making it look real from all angles takes
another hour or two at least.
-Mike
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Cool. The caustics really help to sort of bring it to life.
--
David Fontaine <dav### [at] faricynet> ICQ 55354965
My raytracing gallery: http://davidf.faricy.net/
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
I just meant that having had my share of POLYRAY and
POVray experience and now switching to AM for the bulk
of my work (play) I wouldn't want to approach modeling
that trout casually in POV the same way I would in AM-
especially if I intended to animate it. <sweat breaking
out with just the thought>
-peter
Mike Hough wrote:
>
> It took longer than 10 minutes to model. It took some time to work in the
> details around the mouth and gills. It's like that with AM, you can get the
> general look down real fast but making it look real from all angles takes
> another hour or two at least.
>
> -Mike
--
http://www.users.qwest.net/~dearmad
Why bother? I'm not interesting.
But... maybe "Ballet pour ma fille" will be.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
