POV-Ray : Newsgroups : povray.binaries.images : Stone Church Server Time
18 Aug 2024 00:20:31 EDT (-0400)
  Stone Church (Message 1 to 10 of 15)  
Goto Latest 10 Messages Next 5 Messages >>>
From: Richard Morehouse
Subject: Stone Church
Date: 8 Aug 2001 19:23:38
Message: <8fh3nto3b018ad102d2bhrog2ard82i55d@4ax.com>
Here is my first attempt at a pov scene.

Source is in povray.binaries.scene-files

Any comments?

Richard


Post a reply to this message


Attachments:
Download 'stonechurch.jpg' (145 KB)

Preview of image 'stonechurch.jpg'
stonechurch.jpg


 

From: Ross Litscher
Subject: Re: Stone Church
Date: 8 Aug 2001 23:06:49
Message: <3b71fe49$1@news.povray.org>
i like the dark sparse lighting. the only thing i would change is the marble
texture on the floor. it looks like a bunch of mud was splashed on a
checkerboard. other than that, it's a good first scene. a good second scene
even :)

ross.

Richard Morehouse <ric### [at] earthlinknet> wrote in message
news:8fh3nto3b018ad102d2bhrog2ard82i55d@4ax.com...
> Here is my first attempt at a pov scene.
>
> Source is in povray.binaries.scene-files
>
> Any comments?
>
> Richard
>
>
>


Post a reply to this message

From: Sander
Subject: Re: Stone Church
Date: 9 Aug 2001 03:27:03
Message: <MPG.15dc59ab834aac798982b@NEWS.POVRAY.ORG>
In article <8fh3nto3b018ad102d2bhrog2ard82i55d@4ax.com>, Richard 
Morehouse says...
> Here is my first attempt at a pov scene.
> 
> Source is in povray.binaries.scene-files
> 
> Any comments?
> 
> Richard
> 
Good image, although there is nothing in it that has more than 50% of 
the maximum brightness. IMO therefore it is too dark. It is quite 
rewarding to brighten the scene and see all kinds of details.

I agree with Ross on the remark about the floor :)

-- 
Regards,  Sander


Post a reply to this message

From: Richard Morehouse
Subject: Re: Stone Church
Date: 9 Aug 2001 03:57:52
Message: <0oe4ntc09ei2dpnvaof2blnk5qkjvasstl@4ax.com>
"Ross Litscher" <lit### [at] osuedu> wrote:

>i like the dark sparse lighting. the only thing i would change is the marble
>texture on the floor. it looks like a bunch of mud was splashed on a
>checkerboard. other than that, it's a good first scene. a good second scene
>even :)
>
>ross.
Thanks
  
what would you suggest for a floor texture?
wood?
marble?

for a laugh if I removed  the floor the congregation  would have to
tread water.  there's about 40 feet of water under the church. :)

 Richard


Post a reply to this message

From: Richard Morehouse
Subject: Re: Stone Church
Date: 9 Aug 2001 04:17:01
Message: <13h4ntoqh23uulmovh4j7a4jo4q6flrj51@4ax.com>
Sander <san### [at] stolscom> wrote:

>Good image, although there is nothing in it that has more than 50% of 
>the maximum brightness. IMO therefore it is too dark. It is quite 
>rewarding to brighten the scene and see all kinds of details.
>
>I agree with Ross on the remark about the floor :)

i did a gamma correction on this one

Richard


Post a reply to this message


Attachments:
Download 'stonechurch2.jpg' (451 KB)

Preview of image 'stonechurch2.jpg'
stonechurch2.jpg


 

From: Sander
Subject: Re: Stone Church
Date: 9 Aug 2001 06:09:15
Message: <MPG.15dc7fb09bef0b2098982d@NEWS.POVRAY.ORG>
In article <13h4ntoqh23uulmovh4j7a4jo4q6flrj51@4ax.com>, Richard 
Morehouse says...
> 
> i did a gamma correction on this one
> 
> Richard
> 
Hi Richard, I realize that my remark on the brightness wasn't completely 
correct: the candles did have pixels with near maximum brightness :)

But I agree that your second image has its advantages. The floors I've 
seen in churches were never white/red: only white/black, and only in one 
Unitarian Church IIRC. The veins in the marble are perhaps a little too 
conspicuous. 

And now for the various objects that belong in a church :-))
-- 
Regards,  Sander


Post a reply to this message

From: Jamie Davison
Subject: Re: Stone Church
Date: 9 Aug 2001 06:40:46
Message: <MPG.15dc7991bc307fb59899b7@news.povray.org>
On Wed, 08 Aug 2001 18:21:29 -0500, Richard Morehouse wrote...
> Here is my first attempt at a pov scene.
> 
> Source is in povray.binaries.scene-files
> 
> Any comments?

Umm...  Where are the buttresses?  'Cos the pillars in between the 
windows don't look anywhere near strong enough to support the roof 
load...

Otherwise, quite nice, if a little dark on my system.

Bye for now,
     Jamie.


Post a reply to this message

From: Steve
Subject: Re: Stone Church
Date: 9 Aug 2001 06:54:31
Message: <slrn9n4qq1.ep.steve@zero-pps.localdomain>
On Wed, 08 Aug 2001 18:21:29 -0500, Richard Morehouse wrote:
>Here is my first attempt at a pov scene.
>
>Source is in povray.binaries.scene-files
>
>Any comments?

A great image, but a few criticisisms, there seems to be 
too much contrast in the colours used in the marble tiles, 
they look a bit harsh.  

And the outside view isn't all that clear, it looks asthough 
the church has been plunged into a bath of green water.  

--
Cheers
Steve              email mailto:ste### [at] zeroppsuklinuxnet

%HAV-A-NICEDAY Error not enough coffee  0 pps. 

web http://www.zeropps.uklinux.net/

or  http://start.at/zero-pps

 11:49am  up 26 days, 13:52,  2 users,  load average: 1.38, 1.15, 1.04


Post a reply to this message

From: Sander
Subject: Re: Stone Church
Date: 9 Aug 2001 07:55:39
Message: <MPG.15dc802f7e8f471a98982e@NEWS.POVRAY.ORG>
In article <13h4ntoqh23uulmovh4j7a4jo4q6flrj51@4ax.com>, Richard 
Morehouse says...
> 
> i did a gamma correction on this one
> 
> Richard
> 
Oh, and did you use much less compression on the 2nd jpg?? It was 3x as 
large as the first one !
-- 
Regards,  Sander


Post a reply to this message

From: Ross Litscher
Subject: Re: Stone Church
Date: 9 Aug 2001 12:25:03
Message: <3b72b95f$1@news.povray.org>
yeah, water would work :)

a marble would be good, but less constrasting colors.

>
> what would you suggest for a floor texture?
> wood?
> marble?
>
> for a laugh if I removed  the floor the congregation  would have to
> tread water.  there's about 40 feet of water under the church. :)
>
>  Richard
>


Post a reply to this message

Goto Latest 10 Messages Next 5 Messages >>>

Copyright 2003-2023 Persistence of Vision Raytracer Pty. Ltd.