 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
According to legend this object known as the "Key to Light" grants its
possessor power over light and shadow. For an as yet unknown reason all
photos of the object, like this one, contain no color except for the object
itself.
Andrew
http://members.home.net/akothmann
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'artifact.jpg' (27 KB)
Preview of image 'artifact.jpg'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Okay, now try it with radiosity and photons and see if you can keep the
grays :-)
You might want to thicken those display case sides some to make AA better.
I'm trying to figure out if the gray part of the Key to Light is has a
normal or if I'm seeing reflection.
Bob H.
"Andrew Kothmann" <and### [at] hotmail com> wrote in message
news:3b5b0714@news.povray.org...
> According to legend this object known as the "Key to Light" grants its
> possessor power over light and shadow. For an as yet unknown reason all
> photos of the object, like this one, contain no color except for the
object
> itself.
>
> Andrew
> http://members.home.net/akothmann
>
>
>
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> According to legend this object known as the "Key to Light" grants its
> possessor power over light and shadow. For an as yet unknown reason all
> photos of the object, like this one, contain no color except for the object
> itself.
Looks a bit like the Bane Mystech emblem in Anachronox (guess what I'm
playing ATM :) Try squishing some bugs on it and see what happens ;)
Bye for now,
Jamie.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
I thought about Radiosity but at 3h 18m 17s for this version on my pII 400 I
decided to stop here. Actually I intended it to be lighter but I got such a
nice effect from it being dark that I decided to leave it this way.
Yes, it does have a normal but is also reflective.
Andrew
http://members.home.net/akothmann
Bob H. <omn### [at] msncom> wrote in message
news:3b5b1235@news.povray.org...
> Okay, now try it with radiosity and photons and see if you can keep the
> grays :-)
>
> You might want to thicken those display case sides some to make AA better.
> I'm trying to figure out if the gray part of the Key to Light is has a
> normal or if I'm seeing reflection.
>
> Bob H.
>
> "Andrew Kothmann" <and### [at] hotmailcom> wrote in message
> news:3b5b0714@news.povray.org...
> > According to legend this object known as the "Key to Light" grants its
> > possessor power over light and shadow. For an as yet unknown reason all
> > photos of the object, like this one, contain no color except for the
> object
> > itself.
> >
> > Andrew
> > http://members.home.net/akothmann
> >
> >
> >
>
>
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
I had not heard of that game until you mentioned it. I came up with the
design all on my own. If you notice the colored gems are the primary and
secondary components of white light. Each set is in a triangular
configuration.
Andrew
http://members.home.net/akothmann
Jamie Davison <jam### [at] ntlworldcom> wrote in message
news:MPG.15c52cf94d50c35e9899ac@news.povray.org...
> > According to legend this object known as the "Key to Light" grants its
> > possessor power over light and shadow. For an as yet unknown reason all
> > photos of the object, like this one, contain no color except for the
object
> > itself.
>
> Looks a bit like the Bane Mystech emblem in Anachronox (guess what I'm
> playing ATM :) Try squishing some bugs on it and see what happens ;)
>
> Bye for now,
> Jamie.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
In article <3b5b0714@news.povray.org>, Andrew Kothmann says...
> According to legend this object known as the "Key to Light" grants its
> possessor power over light and shadow. For an as yet unknown reason all
> photos of the object, like this one, contain no color except for the object
> itself.
>
> Andrew
> http://members.home.net/akothmann
>
Eerie :(( Has a nice unworldly touch to it ;-)
--
Regards, Sander
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Thank you very much. That was the effect I was trying to achieve.
Andrew
http://members.home.net/akothmann
Sander <san### [at] stolscom> wrote in message
news:MPG### [at] NEWSPOVRAYORG...
> In article <3b5b0714@news.povray.org>, Andrew Kothmann says...
> > According to legend this object known as the "Key to Light" grants its
> > possessor power over light and shadow. For an as yet unknown reason all
> > photos of the object, like this one, contain no color except for the
object
> > itself.
> >
> > Andrew
> > http://members.home.net/akothmann
> >
>
> Eerie :(( Has a nice unworldly touch to it ;-)
> --
> Regards, Sander
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Andrew Kothmann wrote:
>
> I thought about Radiosity but at 3h 18m 17s for this version on my pII 400
That's nothin'!! ;)
--
David Fontaine <dav### [at] faricynet> ICQ 55354965
My raytracing gallery: http://davidf.faricy.net/
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> That's nothin'!! ;)
No kidding! I'm contemplating taking on a several week render with my
current image, and some might even consider that only mildly long.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Thomas Lake wrote:
>
> > That's nothin'!! ;)
>
> No kidding! I'm contemplating taking on a several week render with my
> current image, and some might even consider that only mildly long.
Now ya know why some people own three computers... ;)
--
David Fontaine <dav### [at] faricynet> ICQ 55354965
My raytracing gallery: http://davidf.faricy.net/
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> Thomas Lake wrote:
> >
> > > That's nothin'!! ;)
> >
> > No kidding! I'm contemplating taking on a several week render with my
> > current image, and some might even consider that only mildly long.
>
> Now ya know why some people own three computers... ;)
Funny you should mention that I have been thinking recently of putting
together a dedicated rendering computer. We have 3 computers in our house,
one for each of us, but if I could put together a dedicated renderer I could
experiment with some extreame images and not pull my hair out waiting to
impliment that next pov image.
>
> --
> David Fontaine <dav### [at] faricynet> ICQ 55354965
> My raytracing gallery: http://davidf.faricy.net/
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
I give up. You are right. I just have a distorted sense of time. I just
don't have the patience to wait that long just to have to re-render to tweak
the settings. Also I am satisfied with it the way it is.
Andrew
http://members.home.net/akothmann
Thomas Lake <tla### [at] homecom> wrote in message
news:3b5c8e0d$1@news.povray.org...
> > Thomas Lake wrote:
> > >
> > > > That's nothin'!! ;)
> > >
> > > No kidding! I'm contemplating taking on a several week render with my
> > > current image, and some might even consider that only mildly long.
> >
> > Now ya know why some people own three computers... ;)
>
> Funny you should mention that I have been thinking recently of putting
> together a dedicated rendering computer. We have 3 computers in our house,
> one for each of us, but if I could put together a dedicated renderer I
could
> experiment with some extreame images and not pull my hair out waiting to
> impliment that next pov image.
> >
> > --
> > David Fontaine <dav### [at] faricynet> ICQ 55354965
> > My raytracing gallery: http://davidf.faricy.net/
>
>
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
>Also I am satisfied with it the way it is.
Well don't let others sway you otherwise then. If you like it then you like
it, it doesn't matter what others think, at least that's what I try to
think, I think;-)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Isaac Newton would love this.
Brendan
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
