 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Yes...
The Ambient-thing worked great. These are two pics, one in broad daylight,
the other with no lightsource at all.
I improved some of the measurements and some of the textures. It's still not
finished, but I quite like it so far!
Still need lots of comments and help from you 'MEGA'-povvers!
Thanx,
Bugs74
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'watchdark.JPG' (52 KB)
Download 'watch.JPG' (73 KB)
Preview of image 'watchdark.JPG'
Preview of image 'watch.JPG'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Hey, an AWSOME ROLLEX ;-)
Anyways, I think it looks pretty cool, a definate improvement from your
other few posts. However, in the night scene, the casing of the watch seems
a bit bright...
Other than that, it looks great! :-)
-Ian
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
>However, in the night scene, the casing of the watch seems a bit bright...
You're right, I forgot to comment the sky-sphere, I guess that should
work...
> Other than that, it looks great! :-)
Thanks!
Bugs74
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
That is looking very nice.
Maybe its the perspective but the hands all seem to be about the same
distance from the dial. Perhaps they should be further apart from each
other?
Are the subdials sunken or flush with the dial?
"Bugs74" <Bug### [at] wanadoo nl> wrote in message
news:3b42119c@news.povray.org...
> Yes...
>
> The Ambient-thing worked great. These are two pics, one in broad daylight,
> the other with no lightsource at all.
> I improved some of the measurements and some of the textures. It's still
not
> finished, but I quite like it so far!
> Still need lots of comments and help from you 'MEGA'-povvers!
>
> Thanx,
>
> Bugs74
>
>
>
>
>
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> That is looking very nice.
Thanks
> Maybe its the perspective but the hands all seem to be about the same
> distance from the dial. Perhaps they should be further apart from each
> other?
I understand, I'll try to adjust it...
> Are the subdials sunken or flush with the dial?
In my own watch they are sunken, but in the image they are flush...
Thanks,
Bugs74
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Bugs74 wrote:
>
> Yes...
>
> The Ambient-thing worked great. These are two pics, one in broad daylight,
> the other with no lightsource at all.
> I improved some of the measurements and some of the textures. It's still not
> finished, but I quite like it so far!
> Still need lots of comments and help from you 'MEGA'-povvers!
The green seems a little oversaturated, especially in the lit shot. You
might go for something a little more ghostly and less minty.
-Xplo
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Bugs74 wrote:
>
> Yes...
>
> The Ambient-thing worked great. These are two pics, one in broad daylight,
> the other with no lightsource at all.
> I improved some of the measurements and some of the textures. It's still not
> finished, but I quite like it so far!
> Still need lots of comments and help from you 'MEGA'-povvers!
>
The night version seems too bright as Ian already metioned. Radiosity
could look nice for the fluorescent parts illuminating the interior of the
watch.
Christoph
--
Christoph Hormann <chr### [at] gmxde>
IsoWood include, radiosity tutorial, TransSkin and other
things on: http://www.schunter.etc.tu-bs.de/~chris/
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
