 |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
Just messing around really, kinda liked what I had done.
Want to add some focal blur, and maybe an image map
saying what make the pens are and need to soften them
shadows a bit.
Please let me know what you think.
Dave.
--
If you set out to fail, and actually succeed, which have you done?
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'pens.jpg' (56 KB)
Preview of image 'pens.jpg'

|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
On Fri, 22 Jun 2001 18:10:21 +0100, Davey B wrote:
>Just messing around really, kinda liked what I had done.
>Want to add some focal blur, and maybe an image map
>saying what make the pens are and need to soften them
>shadows a bit.
>
>Please let me know what you think.
They look fairly good, but the scale seems to be off abit, make them
longer.
--
Cheers
Steve email mailto:ste### [at] zeropps uklinux net
%HAV-A-NICEDAY Error not enough coffee 0 pps.
web http://www.zeropps.uklinux.net/
or http://start.at/zero-pps
8:14pm up 140 days, 21:05, 2 users, load average: 1.06, 1.10, 1.13
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
Davey B schrieb:
> Just messing around really, kinda liked what I had done.
> Want to add some focal blur, and maybe an image map
> saying what make the pens are and need to soften them
> shadows a bit.
>
> Please let me know what you think.
Hmmm, nice modelling... but to me appears it that the blue caps and
gold/brown tips could be somewhat more saturated in color!
See you in Khyberspace!
Yadgar
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
"Steve" <ste### [at] zeropps uklinux net> wrote in message
news:slr### [at] zero-pps localdomain...
> On Fri, 22 Jun 2001 18:10:21 +0100, Davey B wrote:
> >Just messing around really, kinda liked what I had done.
> >Want to add some focal blur, and maybe an image map
> >saying what make the pens are and need to soften them
> >shadows a bit.
>
> They look fairly good, but the scale seems to be off abit, make them
> longer.
There's a lot of perspective to that rendering though, I took a BIC pen and
looked at it to compare. With both eyes open the pen is long and slender,
much unlike these show. Then I closed one eye and the pens were very close
to the same, except for I couldn't focus near enough.
Add caustics or photons to the clear plastic too while your continuing to
fix it up.
I did some BIC pens if you want a look, they need more done to them too.
http://members.aol.com/_ht_a/versecurse/l3bicpen.jpg
Bob H.
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
Nice models. Rhino?
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
No modeled in Moray
BTW what sort of focal blur settings did you have for your tank model.
Thx in Advance
Dave
"Tony[B]" <ben### [at] catholic org> wrote in message
news:3b33b8a7@news.povray.org...
> Nice models. Rhino?
>
>
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
When I first rendered this pen it was vertical and the size seemed perfect
I think the perspective had a lot to do with the "stumpiness" the pens are
currently suffering from.
I tried the pens initially with caustics but was not very impressed. I think
the angle of the light source might not have been favourable.
I am currently in the middle of a render (800 x 600) with focal blur and an
area light that is 8 x 8 (64 lights might be a bit much :) ) So far it has
taken
6 hours to do 43%. I will post the results as soon as they are done.
Thanks for the comments.
Dave.
"Bob H." <omn### [at] msn com> wrote in message
news:3b33ab70@news.povray.org...
> "Steve" <ste### [at] zeropps uklinux net> wrote in message
> news:slr### [at] zero-pps localdomain...
> > On Fri, 22 Jun 2001 18:10:21 +0100, Davey B wrote:
> > >Just messing around really, kinda liked what I had done.
> > >Want to add some focal blur, and maybe an image map
> > >saying what make the pens are and need to soften them
> > >shadows a bit.
> >
> > They look fairly good, but the scale seems to be off abit, make them
> > longer.
>
> There's a lot of perspective to that rendering though, I took a BIC pen
and
> looked at it to compare. With both eyes open the pen is long and slender,
> much unlike these show. Then I closed one eye and the pens were very
close
> to the same, except for I couldn't focus near enough.
> Add caustics or photons to the clear plastic too while your continuing to
> fix it up.
> I did some BIC pens if you want a look, they need more done to them too.
>
> http://members.aol.com/_ht_a/versecurse/l3bicpen.jpg
>
> Bob H.
>
>
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
"Davey B" <kry### [at] totalise co uk*NOSPAM*> wrote in message
news:3b337aef@news.povray.org...
> Just messing around really, kinda liked what I had done.
> Want to add some focal blur, and maybe an image map
> saying what make the pens are and need to soften them
> shadows a bit.
>
> Please let me know what you think.
o_O That looks pretty darn good. I'm fairly speechless here.
--
-The "D"
If you only have a hammer, you tend to
see every problem as a nail.
-- Maslow
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
"Davey B" <kry### [at] totalise co uk*NOSPAM*> wrote in message
news:3b337aef@news.povray.org...
> Just messing around really, kinda liked what I had done.
> Want to add some focal blur, and maybe an image map
> saying what make the pens are and need to soften them
> shadows a bit.
>
> Please let me know what you think.
>
Well, still looks impressive to me :) Nice work
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
"Tony[B]" <ben### [at] catholic org> wrote in message
news:3b33b8a7@news.povray.org...
> Nice models. Rhino?
>
Look like BIC to me ;-)
Andy Cocker
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
Davey B wrote:
>
> I am currently in the middle of a render (800 x 600) with focal blur and an
> area light that is 8 x 8 (64 lights might be a bit much :) ) So far it has
> taken
> 6 hours to do 43%. I will post the results as soon as they are done.
Bah, I have a render paused in the background with hq focal blur and a
buncha stuff at 5100x3400 (30"x20" poster at 170dpi :) that's been going
at 13pps. 400 lines after nearly two days! Oh, and of course "+c -d"
in the command line... ;)
--
David Fontaine <dav### [at] faricy net> ICQ 55354965
My raytracing gallery: http://davidf.faricy.net/
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
Davey B wrote:
> Just messing around really, kinda liked what I had done.
Are the tips supposed to be metal? For me thet look like plastic, and
the ball looks like being moulded to the rest of the tip.
--
/"\ | iki.
\ / ASCII Ribbon Campaign | fi/
X Against HTML Mail | zds
/ \
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
> Bah, I have a render paused in the background with hq focal blur and a
> buncha stuff at 5100x3400 (30"x20" poster at 170dpi :) that's been going
> at 13pps. 400 lines after nearly two days! Oh, and of course "+c -d"
> in the command line... ;)
Is this poster for yourself or is it a job? I have thought of taking some of
my images and rendering them supper big to make a poster for my walls, just
wondering if I'm the only one so vain:-)
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
"Thomas Lake" <tla### [at] home com> wrote in message
news:3b500192$1@news.povray.org...
> > Bah, I have a render paused in the background with hq focal blur and a
> > buncha stuff at 5100x3400 (30"x20" poster at 170dpi :) that's been going
> > at 13pps. 400 lines after nearly two days! Oh, and of course "+c -d"
> > in the command line... ;)
>
> Is this poster for yourself or is it a job? I have thought of taking some
of
> my images and rendering them supper big to make a poster for my walls,
just
> wondering if I'm the only one so vain:-)
Don't know if I'm vain or not (hee hee), although I do have a photo of a
rendering on my wall. Looks pretty bad being an earlier one and with both
CRT monitor and camera lens distortion. Just a 20x30 enlargement. No
incredible render times involved.
I made a different one for my mother, one that she picked out of the photos
I had done of several. She has it hanging on her basement art room wall.
I think the vanity applies since I haven't done anything with someone elses
renderings.
Bob H.
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
<snip>
> Don't know if I'm vain or not (hee hee), although I do have a photo of a
> rendering on my wall. Looks pretty bad being an earlier one and with both
> CRT monitor and camera lens distortion. Just a 20x30 enlargement. No
> incredible render times involved.
>
> I made a different one for my mother, one that she picked out of the
photos
> I had done of several. She has it hanging on her basement art room wall.
Hehe actually I think my uncle would like to have one, since he is the one
who tells people about my work.
> I think the vanity applies since I haven't done anything with someone
elses
> renderings.
>
> Bob H.
Hmm a vew questions about making posters though.
1. Where did you go to have it done?
2. What size i.e resolution and what image format did you use?
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
"Thomas Lake" <tla### [at] home com> wrote in message
news:3b500b78@news.povray.org...
>
> > Don't know if I'm vain or not (hee hee), although I do have a photo of a
> > rendering on my wall. Looks pretty bad being an earlier one and with
both
> > CRT monitor and camera lens distortion. Just a 20x30 enlargement. No
> > incredible render times involved.
>
> Hmm a vew questions about making posters though.
>
> 1. Where did you go to have it done?
>
> 2. What size i.e resolution and what image format did you use?
Hope you aren't asking me, since all I did was take the film negatives into
a local film store which sent them to a film lab to do the poster-sized
prints. My renders were of about the 800x600 to 1024x768 range, I believe,
and you could see the pixels in the final print, so its not a good way to go
considering a monitor usually gets only 1600x1200 max. (aside from the
perspective distortions).
Anyway, I'm interested in hearing what is done to get posters from files
too. Even if I think I've heard before.
Bob H.
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
Thomas Lake wrote:
>
> Is this poster for yourself or is it a job? I have thought of taking some of
> my images and rendering them supper big to make a poster for my walls, just
> wondering if I'm the only one so vain:-)
Myself. :) Maybe I could make it a business though...
--
David Fontaine <dav### [at] faricy net> ICQ 55354965
My raytracing gallery: http://davidf.faricy.net/
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
"Bob H." wrote:
>
> Anyway, I'm interested in hearing what is done to get posters from files
> too. Even if I think I've heard before.
I would assume just take it Kinko's and say ya want a 30x20 poster, and
pay through your nose for it. Of course, i'd assume it'd be good to
have a png for gamma issues, but that doesn't work with +c. I'm not
sure if color resolution matters.
--
David Fontaine <dav### [at] faricy net> ICQ 55354965
My raytracing gallery: http://davidf.faricy.net/
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |