![](/i/fill.gif) |
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
All the information you need is in the text of the image. I think. Ask away
if I missed anything. Comments appreciated. Suggestions, probably not. I
think I'm done. Enjoy. :)
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'panzerv3.jpg' (75 KB)
Preview of image 'panzerv3.jpg'
![panzerv3.jpg](/povray.binaries.images/attachment/%3C3b2df60a%40news.povray.org%3E/panzerv3.jpg?ttop=443840&toff=10750&preview=1)
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
I like it ! :)
Rune
--
3D images and anims, include files, tutorials and more:
Rune's World: http://rsj.mobilixnet.dk (updated May 10)
POV-Ray Users: http://rsj.mobilixnet.dk/povrayusers/
POV-Ray Webring: http://webring.povray.co.uk
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
> I like it ! :)
On a scale of 1 (shiny plastic) to 10 (AWSOME ROLEX), how realistic is it?
:)
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
"Tony[B]" wrote:
>
> > I like it ! :)
>
> On a scale of 1 (shiny plastic) to 10 (AWSOME ROLEX), how realistic is it?
> :)
It depends. The only Panzer I ever saw was a plastic model that had
been painted in beige allover, so I'd give it an 11 (AWSOME shiny
palstic ROLLEX!!!1!)
--
Francois Labreque | It is by caffeine alone I set my mind in motion, it
flabreque | is by the beans of Java that thoughts acquire speed,
@ | the hands acquire shaking, the shaking becomes a
videotron.ca | warning, it is by caffeine alone I set my mind in
| motion.
- Stolen from Badger's .sig file
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
"Tony[B]" <ben### [at] catholic org> wrote in message
news:3b2df60a@news.povray.org...
> All the information you need is in the text of the image. I think. Ask
away
> if I missed anything. Comments appreciated. Suggestions, probably not. I
> think I'm done. Enjoy. :)
*jaw drops*
Now that's some fine detail! *drools*
-Ian
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
AWSOM ROLEX!!
Is resizing renderings a specific technique of yours? I mean, it looks
really smoother than normal POV antialiasing.
Jonathan
"Tony[B]" <ben### [at] catholic org> ha scritto nel messaggio
news:3b2df60a@news.povray.org...
> All the information you need is in the text of the image. I think. Ask
away
> if I missed anything. Comments appreciated. Suggestions, probably not. I
> think I'm done. Enjoy. :)
>
>
>
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
In article <3b2df60a@news.povray.org>, Tony[B] says...
> All the information you need is in the text of the image. I think. Ask away
> if I missed anything. Comments appreciated. Suggestions, probably not. I
> think I'm done. Enjoy. :)
>
Admirable - amazing - awsome !
The one minor point is that I do not like the post-process focal blur
from this view point: it seems a little unnecessary...
--
Regards, Sander
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
> AWSOM ROLEX!!
Aw, come on. :)
> Is resizing renderings a specific technique of yours? I mean, it looks
> really smoother than normal POV antialiasing.
Perhaps because I didn't use 'normal' AA? I used +AM2 +A0.1 +J0.0 in the INI
file. Then I went into Photoshop, resized it to half its original size, and
faded the sharpness in by 50%. (I don't like 100% sharpness for renders.
Works well on pictures, though.) That's what you see here.
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
> Admirable - amazing - awsome !
Thank you, Grampa Sander. :)
> The one minor point is that I do not like the post-process focal blur
> from this view point: it seems a little unnecessary...
True, but it looks cool and hints a bit more to "realistic", so I just had
to put it in. :)
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
On Tue, 19 Jun 2001 07:31:19 -0600, "Tony[B]" <ben### [at] catholic org>
wrote:
>Perhaps because I didn't use 'normal' AA? I used +AM2 +A0.1 +J0.0 in the INI
>file. Then I went into Photoshop, resized it to half its original size, and
>faded the sharpness in by 50%. (I don't like 100% sharpness for renders.
>Works well on pictures, though.) That's what you see here.
Try this some time. If you resize the image down n times, apply a n*n
mosaic filter before hand and scale down without interpolation
(nearest neighbour). Works best when scaling down a lot.
Peter Popov ICQ : 15002700
Personal e-mail : pet### [at] vip bg
TAG e-mail : pet### [at] tag povray org
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |