 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Tony[B]" wrote:
>
> > I like it ! :)
>
> On a scale of 1 (shiny plastic) to 10 (AWSOME ROLEX), how realistic is it?
> :)
It depends. The only Panzer I ever saw was a plastic model that had
been painted in beige allover, so I'd give it an 11 (AWSOME shiny
palstic ROLLEX!!!1!)
--
Francois Labreque | It is by caffeine alone I set my mind in motion, it
flabreque | is by the beans of Java that thoughts acquire speed,
@ | the hands acquire shaking, the shaking becomes a
videotron.ca | warning, it is by caffeine alone I set my mind in
| motion.
- Stolen from Badger's .sig file
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Tony[B]" <ben### [at] catholic org> wrote in message
news:3b2df60a@news.povray.org...
> All the information you need is in the text of the image. I think. Ask
away
> if I missed anything. Comments appreciated. Suggestions, probably not. I
> think I'm done. Enjoy. :)
*jaw drops*
Now that's some fine detail! *drools*
-Ian
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
AWSOM ROLEX!!
Is resizing renderings a specific technique of yours? I mean, it looks
really smoother than normal POV antialiasing.
Jonathan
"Tony[B]" <ben### [at] catholicorg> ha scritto nel messaggio
news:3b2df60a@news.povray.org...
> All the information you need is in the text of the image. I think. Ask
away
> if I missed anything. Comments appreciated. Suggestions, probably not. I
> think I'm done. Enjoy. :)
>
>
>
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
In article <3b2df60a@news.povray.org>, Tony[B] says...
> All the information you need is in the text of the image. I think. Ask away
> if I missed anything. Comments appreciated. Suggestions, probably not. I
> think I'm done. Enjoy. :)
>
Admirable - amazing - awsome !
The one minor point is that I do not like the post-process focal blur
from this view point: it seems a little unnecessary...
--
Regards, Sander
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> AWSOM ROLEX!!
Aw, come on. :)
> Is resizing renderings a specific technique of yours? I mean, it looks
> really smoother than normal POV antialiasing.
Perhaps because I didn't use 'normal' AA? I used +AM2 +A0.1 +J0.0 in the INI
file. Then I went into Photoshop, resized it to half its original size, and
faded the sharpness in by 50%. (I don't like 100% sharpness for renders.
Works well on pictures, though.) That's what you see here.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> Admirable - amazing - awsome !
Thank you, Grampa Sander. :)
> The one minor point is that I do not like the post-process focal blur
> from this view point: it seems a little unnecessary...
True, but it looks cool and hints a bit more to "realistic", so I just had
to put it in. :)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Tue, 19 Jun 2001 07:31:19 -0600, "Tony[B]" <ben### [at] catholicorg>
wrote:
>Perhaps because I didn't use 'normal' AA? I used +AM2 +A0.1 +J0.0 in the INI
>file. Then I went into Photoshop, resized it to half its original size, and
>faded the sharpness in by 50%. (I don't like 100% sharpness for renders.
>Works well on pictures, though.) That's what you see here.
Try this some time. If you resize the image down n times, apply a n*n
mosaic filter before hand and scale down without interpolation
(nearest neighbour). Works best when scaling down a lot.
Peter Popov ICQ : 15002700
Personal e-mail : pet### [at] vipbg
TAG e-mail : pet### [at] tagpovrayorg
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Tony[B]" wrote:
>
> All the information you need is in the text of the image. I think. Ask away
> if I missed anything. Comments appreciated. Suggestions, probably not. I
> think I'm done. Enjoy. :)
>
The lighting looks very good, the textures are quite simple of course, but
this isn't a bad thing IMO.
Christoph
--
Christoph Hormann <chr### [at] gmxde>
IsoWood include, radiosity tutorial, TransSkin and other
things on: http://www.schunter.etc.tu-bs.de/~chris/
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> Try this some time. If you resize the image down n times, apply a n*n
> mosaic filter before hand and scale down without interpolation
> (nearest neighbour). Works best when scaling down a lot.
Interesting. It does seem to be a little bit sharper when I zoom in. Thanks
for the tip.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
what a cool tip! That sharpens things nicely... works
in PSP too.
--
http://www.users.qwest.net/~dearmad
But why bother? I'm not interesting.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
