From: Tony[B]
Subject: Re: Radiosity Test with Hi-Res Model (~75k)
Date: 15 Jun 2001 12:33:06
Message: <3b2a38c2@news.povray.org>
> That looks good although i think there is some room for higher quality> settings, unless you have already reached the count 1600 limit ;-)
I used 500 for this one. I think it looks fine. Tell me where you see a
problem. Maybe you're talking about the crappy area_light I used?
> How much memory does it use without radiosity BTW?
I wasn't counting. I don't know.
From: Christoph Hormann
Subject: Re: Radiosity Test with Hi-Res Model (~75k)
Date: 15 Jun 2001 13:07:34
Message: <3B2A4106.7764F758@gmx.de>
"Tony[B]" wrote:
> > I used 500 for this one. I think it looks fine. Tell me where you see a> problem. Maybe you're talking about the crappy area_light I used?>
Oh, i thought there was no light source.
It looks nice, i just thought the shadows could be less uniform.
Christoph
--
Christoph Hormann <chr### [at] gmxde>
IsoWood include, radiosity tutorial, TransSkin and other
things on: http://www.schunter.etc.tu-bs.de/~chris/
From: Tek
Subject: Re: Radiosity Test with Hi-Res Model (~75k)
Date: 17 Jun 2001 09:32:53
Message: <3b2cb185@news.povray.org>
Wow! Those settings are great! I just tried them on a model of mine and it looks
twice as good now :) It really picks out the sharp edges.
Thanks!
--
Tek
http://www.evilsuperbrain.com
From: Tony[B]
Subject: Re: Radiosity Test with Hi-Res Model (~75k)
Date: 17 Jun 2001 10:39:09
Message: <3b2cc10d@news.povray.org>
> Wow! Those settings are great! I just tried them on a model of mine and it
looks
> twice as good now :) It really picks out the sharp edges.
You're welcome. Just remember: these settings work well only in outdoor
scenes. Indoor is a whole other ball of wax.
de>
IsoWood include, radiosity tutorial, TransSkin and other
things on: http://www.schunter.etc.tu-bs.de/~chris/