|
 |
All I can say is WOW, and I wish it had been entered in
the Cascade Stereoscopic Club's 3D image competition ;-(
http://www.cascade3d.org
The judging starts on Friday so I guess it is too late.
You'd have to render a left and right image and there
is a $5 registration fee. Check it out anyway.
Harold
"JRG" <jrg### [at] hotmail com> wrote in message
news:3b24a8b6@news.povray.org...
> I really had much to study this week, so there are just a few changes.
>
> Things to add:
> everything already told and not added yet.
>
> Question:
> For this scene I'm working in 1024x768 (60 hertz which are killing my
> eyes...) rather than my usual 800x600. Yesterday I turned back to 800x600
> and I could see that this image is quite out of size for this resolution
> (and antialiasing method 1 doesn't seem to be sufficient). My question is:
> which resolution do the judges work with? I mean, there are images that at
> lower resolutions don't look as good as at higher resolutions. Should I
add
> a "best viewed at 1024x768 or up"...?
> Thanks in advance,
> Jonathan.
>
>
>
>
>
>
Post a reply to this message
|
|
|
|
"Harold Baize" <bai### [at] itsaucsfedu> ha scritto nel messaggio
news:3b27cdb8@news.povray.org...
> All I can say is WOW, and I wish it had been entered in
> the Cascade Stereoscopic Club's 3D image competition ;-(
>
> http://www.cascade3d.org
>
> The judging starts on Friday so I guess it is too late.
> You'd have to render a left and right image and there
> is a $5 registration fee. Check it out anyway.
>
I don't think I'm allowed to enter two different competitions with the same
image, but thank you anyway.
I'm not familiar with steroscopic images (well I discovered computer
graphics at all just last summer...) but I'll check it out. It looks cool.
Regards,
Jonathan .
Post a reply to this message
|
|
