 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Norbert Kern wrote:
>
> Christoph, what is a hierarchical grouping?
> You mentioned this in your "water tunnel final" thread and I am very
> interested but unsuspecting.
If you group the trees with union{} in a tree-like structure this can
speed up things a lot. For example combine two trees standing near to
each other and combine two of these 'doubles' and so on. If the trees are
placed in a (more or less) regular grid, a recursive macro would be best
for that, otherwise things can be more difficult.
I'm not sure how much can be gained in this case, so maybe it's not worth
the efforts.
>
> I tried radiosity my second version and the most simple settings. Rendering
> time increased by a factor of twenty without any visible advantage.
> I will try a fill light as you suggest.
>
Adding radiosity and no visible effect - very strange. For experiments i
would use a 'light' version without the grass and reflections and only a
few trees BTW.
Christoph
--
Christoph Hormann <chr### [at] gmx de>
IsoWood include, radiosity tutorial, TransSkin and other
things on: http://www.schunter.etc.tu-bs.de/~chris/
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Thu, 7 Jun 2001 19:11:07 +0200, Norbert Kern wrote:
>Suggestions?
Superb image!
But I'd expect trees in such a wet environment to have much
larger leaves, trees that have small leaves tend to be in
dry locations where the leaves have to be small to reduce
water loss.
Your methods seem to be serving you well.
--
Cheers
Steve email mailto:ste### [at] zeroppsuklinuxnet
%HAV-A-NICEDAY Error not enough coffee 0 pps.
web http://www.zeropps.uklinux.net/
or http://start.at/zero-pps
3:42pm up 126 days, 16:32, 2 users, load average: 1.01, 1.02, 1.00
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Norbert Kern wrote:
> <snip>
> Suggestions?
I love it just the way it is.
But can you render me up a 2" flat pebble, I dying to see if I can bounce it
all the way to the other bank.
Insects and Fish spring to mind, but I'm not sure if either would be
noticable in the scene; I'll let you decide.
--
Duncan Gray
(warning: may contain traces of nut)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
The last one looked better IMO. Looks like jpeg stuff. Can you link to
a lower compression version?
--
David Fontaine <dav### [at] faricynet> ICQ 55354965
My raytracing gallery: http://davidf.faricy.net/
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
But by changing textures and adding a fill light the results are better now.
It is also necessary to render with at least AA 0.1.
And yes, there are some jpeg artefacts (notice to me: 42 % quality is too
low).
Tomorrow I will post a better fourth version hopefully.
"David Fontaine" <dav### [at] faricynet> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
news:3B22FE0A.651AB9DB@faricy.net...
> The last one looked better IMO. Looks like jpeg stuff. Can you link to
> a lower compression version?
>
> --
> David Fontaine <dav### [at] faricynet> ICQ 55354965
> My raytracing gallery: http://davidf.faricy.net/
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
thanks.
The mud is obviously lacking things like stones, twigs or leaves.
They will be added soon.
I will have to add insects to avoid zero points in concept definitively.
"Duncan Gray" <dun### [at] eclipsecouk> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
news:3b2132bd@news.povray.org...
>
> I love it just the way it is.
>
> But can you render me up a 2" flat pebble, I dying to see if I can bounce
it
> all the way to the other bank.
>
> Insects and Fish spring to mind, but I'm not sure if either would be
> noticable in the scene; I'll let you decide.
>
> --
> Duncan Gray
> (warning: may contain traces of nut)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
I live in middle europe in bavaria. We call temporarily flooded areas in
As far as I know, in such areas grow trees like willows, alders, sorts of
to them.
Nethertheless the leaves should be in the range of 5 to 15 cm ( 2 to 6
inch).
Perhaps you have experiences with a more tropic climate?
Norbert
"Steve" <ste### [at] zeroppsuklinuxnet> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
news:slr### [at] zero-ppslocaldomain...
> On Thu, 7 Jun 2001 19:11:07 +0200, Norbert Kern wrote:
>
> Superb image!
>
> But I'd expect trees in such a wet environment to have much
> larger leaves, trees that have small leaves tend to be in
> dry locations where the leaves have to be small to reduce
> water loss.
>
> Your methods seem to be serving you well.
>
> --
> Cheers
> Steve email mailto:ste### [at] zeroppsuklinuxnet
>
> %HAV-A-NICEDAY Error not enough coffee 0 pps.
>
> web http://www.zeropps.uklinux.net/
>
> or http://start.at/zero-pps
>
> 3:42pm up 126 days, 16:32, 2 users, load average: 1.01, 1.02, 1.00
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Norbert Kern wrote:
> I will have to add insects to avoid zero points in concept definitively.
Butterflies ?
--
Ken Tyler
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> And yes, there are some jpeg artefacts (notice to me: 42 % quality is too
> low).
> Tomorrow I will post a better fourth version hopefully.
Okay. I see that cross hatch pattern in it. No way that came from POV.
--
David Fontaine <dav### [at] faricynet> ICQ 55354965
My raytracing gallery: http://davidf.faricy.net/
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
In article <3B2388C2.94A0BBCB@pacbell.net>, Ken <tyl### [at] pacbellnet>
wrote:
> Butterflies ?
I'm thinking of insects that come from an aquatic nymphal/pupal form:
mayflies, caddis flies, stoneflies, etc. And some swarms of midges.
--
Christopher James Huff - chr### [at] maccom, http://homepage.mac.com/chrishuff/
TAG: chr### [at] tagpovrayorg, http://tag.povray.org/
<><
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
