 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Dave B wrote:
>
> Here is the Image.....Doh.
>
I like this. Good concept.
I think you could increase the height of the waves to increase the
impact of the image. Just a thought.
Regards, Alberto.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
I have done a version with more turbulent water.
I think you lose too much detail from the reflections though.
What do you think.
Dave
"Alberto Mendoza" <jac### [at] usb ve> wrote in message
news:3ADC8804.CA9452F5@usb.ve...
>
>
> Dave B wrote:
> >
> > Here is the Image.....Doh.
> >
>
> I like this. Good concept.
>
> I think you could increase the height of the waves to increase the
> impact of the image. Just a thought.
>
> Regards, Alberto.
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'Nightmare2.jpg' (49 KB)
Preview of image 'Nightmare2.jpg'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
In article <3adc929b@news.povray.org>, Dave B says...
> I have done a version with more turbulent water.
> I think you lose too much detail from the reflections though.
> What do you think.
>
> Dave
IMO the nessy is not moving, so why is the woman so afraid??
--
Regards, Sander
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
There were two interpretations that i had. the first was that the lady is
being attacked by some sea monster. But then i thought that it looked like
the woman could *be* the sea monster. i mean, it's a sea monster with a
womans body as the top part. I like this second interpretation better :) It
would be nightmarish to me if a swimmign woman seemed to be approaching my
boat, then suddenly i'm destroyed by her giant serpent-like body.
in any case, i like the myst, mountains, and general feel to this picture.
good work.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
I am working on ripples and splashes from both the creatures and the woman,
I am just having problems getting anything that looks convicing.
Also read Ross Litscher's interpretation of the scene, it gives it a
different dimension.
Dave
"Sander" <san### [at] stolscom> wrote in message
news:MPG### [at] NEWSPOVRAYORG...
> In article <3adc929b@news.povray.org>, Dave B says...
> > I have done a version with more turbulent water.
> > I think you lose too much detail from the reflections though.
> > What do you think.
> >
> > Dave
>
> IMO the nessy is not moving, so why is the woman so afraid??
>
>
> --
> Regards, Sander
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Wow, I see what you mean, I had not even looked at it in this way. Thanks
for you comments.
Dave
"Ross Litscher" <lit### [at] osuedu> wrote in message
news:3adc9a48@news.povray.org...
> There were two interpretations that i had. the first was that the lady is
> being attacked by some sea monster. But then i thought that it looked
like
> the woman could *be* the sea monster. i mean, it's a sea monster with a
> womans body as the top part. I like this second interpretation better :)
It
> would be nightmarish to me if a swimmign woman seemed to be approaching my
> boat, then suddenly i'm destroyed by her giant serpent-like body.
>
> in any case, i like the myst, mountains, and general feel to this picture.
> good work.
>
>
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
I think the female needs more mystery. More attraction/repulsion. Right
now, especially with the haircut she looks like a perky flight attendant
or model in a hair-rinse ad.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Dave B wrote:
>
> I have done a version with more turbulent water.
> I think you lose too much detail from the reflections though.
> What do you think.
>
I personally prefer this than the original.
Regards, Alberto
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Fair comment. But arn't all the woman in B movies and the likes exactly like
that. It does not matter what monster or madman is after them, their makup
and hair never looks out of place :)
Dave
"J Charter" <jrc### [at] aolcom> wrote in message
news:3ADCC9B4.AAC07D35@aol.com...
>
>
> I think the female needs more mystery. More attraction/repulsion. Right
> now, especially with the haircut she looks like a perky flight attendant
> or model in a hair-rinse ad.
>
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Dave B wrote:
> Fair comment. But arn't all the woman in B movies and the likes exactly like
> that. It does not matter what monster or madman is after them, their makup
> and hair never looks out of place :)
>
>
Oh! I see! I misinterpreted the picture. Didn't realize she was the victim. I
thought she was the head of the monster. OK then the perky look is
appropriate.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
