|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Haven't reduced the intensity of the engines, but from this angle I agree
with Ken. They're too bright.
Rendered at clock = 0.1
Took almost 3 hours on a P2-400 with 128Mb
http://www.geocities.com/dafrahn/photo2.htm
for the previous revsions
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'shuttle9.jpg' (98 KB)
Preview of image 'shuttle9.jpg'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: Data
Subject: Re: WIP the shuttle and hangar slightly reworked
Date: 19 Apr 2001 16:01:44
Message: <3adf4428@news.povray.org>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Data" wrote.
> Haven't reduced the intensity of the engines, but from this angle I agree
> with Ken. They're too bright.
> Rendered at clock = 0.1
> Took almost 3 hours on a P2-400 with 128Mb
>
> http://www.geocities.com/dafrahn/photo2.htm
> for the previous revsions
>
Okay, huge changes now. New engines (my first try at media), a carpark
added, rails, better staircase/platforms, more lighting and another room on
the roof.
Last time I looked at the stats, it was 81% rendered after 1 day, 32
minutes. 640x480. I had to go out after that :(
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'shuttle12.jpg' (160 KB)
Preview of image 'shuttle12.jpg'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: Mark Wagner
Subject: Re: WIP the shuttle and hangar slightly reworked
Date: 20 Apr 2001 01:13:49
Message: <3adfc58d@news.povray.org>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Data wrote in message <3adf4428@news.povray.org>...
>Okay, huge changes now. New engines (my first try at media), a carpark
>added, rails, better staircase/platforms, more lighting and another room on
>the roof.
Much better now, particularly with the new camera view.
--
Mark
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: Data
Subject: Re: WIP the shuttle and hangar slightly reworked
Date: 20 Apr 2001 15:07:30
Message: <3ae088f2@news.povray.org>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Mark Wagner" wrote
> Data wrote
>
> >Okay, huge changes now. New engines (my first try at media), a carpark
> >added, rails, better staircase/platforms, more lighting and another room
on
> >the roof.
>
> Much better now, particularly with the new camera view.
>
I think I need to pull back a bit more, though. And perhaps open the angle
of the overheads
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Great improvement. I like the new viewpoint.
--
David Fontaine <dav### [at] faricynet> ICQ 55354965
My raytracing gallery: http://davidf.faricy.net/
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |