 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Thank you, but don't hold your breath.
Alf
"Steve" <ste### [at] zeropps uklinuxnet> wrote in message
news:slr### [at] zero-ppslocaldomain...
> I love this, can't wait to see the finished product
> one day.
>
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Alf Peake wrote:
>
> From an idea seen in a pen and ink cartoon last year.
>
> <whinge> Mouse's backside wrong shape, but Hey! What d'you expect with
> handmade blobs after a month? Paws look more like hands, need pointy
> bits on end of digits. Supposed to be a mouldy bit of cheese but looks
> too artificial. </whinge>
>
That mouse looks really good, the fur could be improved of course.
> Floor will be dirty, worn, wood planks I hope. Or the easy way out -
> concrete!
Try the IsoWood include file...
Christoph
--
Christoph Hormann <chr### [at] gmxde>
IsoWood include, radiosity tutorial, TransSkin and other
things on: http://www.schunter.etc.tu-bs.de/~chris/
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
I think the paws are allright. I use to have various rodents as pets when i
was young. the hamsters i remember had very hand-like paws, they were pink
though.
>
> <whinge> Mouse's backside wrong shape, but Hey! What d'you expect with
> handmade blobs after a month? Paws look more like hands, need pointy
> bits on end of digits. Supposed to be a mouldy bit of cheese but looks
> too artificial. </whinge
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> Ta. Only mildly? :(
Yep. Radiosity and real fur might help.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Alf Peake" <alf### [at] peake42freeservecouk> wrote in message
news:3aaab1e9@news.povray.org...
> From an idea seen in a pen and ink cartoon last year.
>
> <whinge> Mouse's backside wrong shape, but Hey! What d'you expect with
> handmade blobs after a month? Paws look more like hands, need pointy
> bits on end of digits. Supposed to be a mouldy bit of cheese but looks
> too artificial. </whinge>
>
> Floor will be dirty, worn, wood planks I hope. Or the easy way out -
> concrete!
>
> Mouses will probly be extinct by the time this scene gets finished :-/
>
I like this image a lot, it doesn't have any extremely amazing technical
abilities - which is what counts - its clear and obvious whats going on and
extremely sweet, to be honest apart from some light fur and possibly in a
bit more of a scene it doesn't need any more work IMO. The colours/contrast
works great as you instantly see what is going on.
Top Image
Peter Cracknell (.com)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 2001-03-10 21:52, Alf Peake <alf### [at] peake42freeservecouk> wrote:
>From an idea seen in a pen and ink cartoon last year.
Congrats to the cartoonist :-)
><whinge> Mouse's backside wrong shape,
You are right. The body looks more like a monkey than a mouse. Try
making the hips wider and the shoulders narrower, the thighs shorter and
the calves longer and the back curved up a bit.
The head and the tail are perfect, though.
>but Hey! What d'you expect with handmade blobs after a month?
I know that feeling. Except that I usually give up on using blobs :-(
hp
--
_ | Peter J. Holzer | All Linux applications run on Solaris,
|_|_) | Sysadmin WSR | which is our implementation of Linux.
| | | hjp### [at] wsracat |
__/ | http://www.hjp.at/ | -- Scott McNealy, Dec. 2000
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Christoph Hormann" <chr### [at] gmxde> wrote in message
news:3AABA750.9508E10B@gmx.de...
>
[snip]
> That mouse looks really good, the fur could be improved of course.
Thanks, and will work a little harder on the fur.
>
> > Floor will be dirty, worn, wood planks I hope. Or the easy way
out -
> > concrete!
>
> Try the IsoWood include file...
I get greater satisfaction with do-it-yourself. I've not looked at
your IsoWood include yet. I did see your demo post and was impressed.
Must have a play with it when I get time.
>
> Christoph
>
Alf
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Ross Litscher" <lit### [at] osuedu> wrote in message
news:3aababff$1@news.povray.org...
> I think the paws are allright. I use to have various rodents as pets
when i
> was young. the hamsters i remember had very hand-like paws, they
were pink
> though.
>
The paws were pink like the tail, but they looked even more like hands
then. Kept mice myself as a kid. Made what seemed like lots of money
at the time selling the young in school :-)
Alf
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Peter J. Holzer" <hjp### [at] hjpat> wrote in message
news:slr### [at] tealhhjpat...
> On 2001-03-10 21:52, Alf Peake <alf### [at] peake42freeservecouk> wrote:
> >From an idea seen in a pen and ink cartoon last year.
>
> Congrats to the cartoonist :-)
>
> ><whinge> Mouse's backside wrong shape,
>
> You are right. The body looks more like a monkey than a mouse. Try
> making the hips wider and the shoulders narrower, the thighs shorter
and
> the calves longer and the back curved up a bit.
Ever had that situation trying to get all 4 legs of a table or chair
the same length? Increase one component and the others don't look
right then :-} Thanks for the advice though.
>
> The head and the tail are perfect, though.
Thank you.
>
> >but Hey! What d'you expect with handmade blobs after a month?
>
> I know that feeling. Except that I usually give up on using blobs
:-(
>
> hp
Alf
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Peter Cracknell" <pc### [at] lineonenet> wrote in message
news:3aabdd8d@news.povray.org...
>
> "Alf Peake" <alf### [at] peake42freeservecouk> wrote in message
> news:3aaab1e9@news.povray.org...
> > From an idea seen in a pen and ink cartoon last year.
[snip]
>
> I like this image a lot, it doesn't have any extremely amazing
technical
> abilities - which is what counts - its clear and obvious whats going
on and
> extremely sweet, to be honest apart from some light fur and possibly
in a
> bit more of a scene it doesn't need any more work IMO. The
colours/contrast
> works great as you instantly see what is going on.
>
> Top Image
>
> Peter Cracknell (.com)
>
>
Thanks Peter. The original cartoon was around 3:1 aspect ratio. The
viewing angle was high enough to avoid any background, just floor
boards. I already had a mousetrap and helmet and thought the scene
would be easier. I was wrong :(
Alf
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
