 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"David Fontaine" wrote:
> Wow, that's pretty realistic! Cool model too :)
Thank you! :)
Rune
--
\ Include files, tutorials, 3D images, raytracing jokes,
/ The POV Desktop Theme, and The POV-Ray Logo Contest can
\ all be found at http://rsj.mobilixnet.dk (updated January 28)
/ Also visit http://www.povrayusers.org
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"ddombrow" wrote:
> Blast it all, Rune!
> Don't post photos here.
Oh, sorry, I posted the photo, but forgot to post the image of my POV-Ray
model. Here it is. I have not come very far yet, but it's getting there.
Rune
--
\ Include files, tutorials, 3D images, raytracing jokes,
/ The POV Desktop Theme, and The POV-Ray Logo Contest can
\ all be found at http://rsj.mobilixnet.dk (updated January 28)
/ Also visit http://www.povrayusers.org
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'fishmodel.jpg' (4 KB)
Preview of image 'fishmodel.jpg'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Mick Hazelgrove" wrote:
> I had to look twice to make sure it wasn't a photo - great job!
Thank you!
I will try to improve the lightning to take the realism a bit further.
Rune
--
\ Include files, tutorials, 3D images, raytracing jokes,
/ The POV Desktop Theme, and The POV-Ray Logo Contest can
\ all be found at http://rsj.mobilixnet.dk (updated January 28)
/ Also visit http://www.povrayusers.org
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Josh English" wrote:
> It has a great texture to it, radiosity could really make
> it look more life life (as a clay sculpture, of course).
I will look into it.
> It's a great piece of modeling.
Thanks! It's made of blobs if anyone was in doubt.
Rune
--
\ Include files, tutorials, 3D images, raytracing jokes,
/ The POV Desktop Theme, and The POV-Ray Logo Contest can
\ all be found at http://rsj.mobilixnet.dk (updated January 28)
/ Also visit http://www.povrayusers.org
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Rick [Kitty5]" wrote:
> is this the clay model or you pov render <g> - very realistic !
Thank you! :D
Rune
--
\ Include files, tutorials, 3D images, raytracing jokes,
/ The POV Desktop Theme, and The POV-Ray Logo Contest can
\ all be found at http://rsj.mobilixnet.dk (updated January 28)
/ Also visit http://www.povrayusers.org
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Margus Ramst" wrote:
> Whoa, I had to look twice to make sure you weren't BS-ing
> us with a photo - in fact I'm still a bit suspicious :)
Any particular thing that gives away that it isn't a photo?
> This looks like an ideal subject for radiosity lighting.
I thought so myself.
> I like the camera angle as it is, the viewpoint gives the
> fish a slightly maniacal air...
Yes, that's intentional. :)
> Not sure what the setting should be, perhaps none is needed.
Yeah, I have no plans of creating a setting...
Thanks for the feedback!
Rune
--
\ Include files, tutorials, 3D images, raytracing jokes,
/ The POV Desktop Theme, and The POV-Ray Logo Contest can
\ all be found at http://rsj.mobilixnet.dk (updated January 28)
/ Also visit http://www.povrayusers.org
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
In article <3a9abd33@news.povray.org>, run### [at] iname com says...
> Any particular thing that gives away that it isn't a photo?
The perfecly sharp shadows. -> Use area lights and/or radiosity.
Lutz-Peter
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Rune" <run### [at] inamecom> wrote:
>
> Any particular thing that gives away that it isn't a photo?
>
As Lutz-Peter said, mostly the sharp shadows; also the way the texture is
lost in the shadow (e.g. inside the mouth). If you get the radiosity
lighting right, there should be very few obvious giveaways. The modelling
itself is all but ideal.
--
Margus Ramst
Personal e-mail: mar### [at] peakeduee
TAG (Team Assistance Group) e-mail: mar### [at] tagpovrayorg
Home page http://www.hot.ee/margusrt
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Hello Rune.
Like several others, I wondered for a moment whether I was looking at a
photo of the clay model.
What gave it away to me way the sharp shadows, and the lack of a background,
so in my humble opinion I'd suggest that is where the work is needed for a
phot-realistic effect. Area-lighting and a background - perhaps place it on
a pile of paper as though it's being used as a paper-weight.
I don't think you need to do anything to the model itself - I'd call it
photo-realistic already.
I was going to ask how you'd done it, I didn't think it could have been just
blobs and a surface normal, but your previous replies have confirmed that
this is the case.
A brilliant piece of work from a master of blobs.
--
Duncan Gray
(warning: may contain traces of nut)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
needs radiosity :)
--
Dan D.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
