 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"David Fontaine" <dav### [at] faricy net> wrote in message
news:3A8### [at] faricynet...
> Steve wrote:
>
> > Nice work, but the borard needs edging.
>
> Life has enough constraints. What's wrong with free squares? Free the
> squares! :)
>
Maybe the squares don't want to be free, maybe they like being
constrained - did you think of that ? Eh ? Did you ? ;-)
--
Scott Hill.
NC Graphics (Cambridge) Ltd.
http://www.ncgraphics.co.uk
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
This is as good a context as any to ask ...
In a lot of pix, there's a gray that looks unnaturally bright (and flat)
to me; here, for example, it's in the White pieces on the left,
particularly the two nearest. Is it my monitor, or JPEG, or what? Does
anyone else see it?
--
Anton Sherwood -- br0### [at] p0b0xcom -- http://ogre.nu/
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
In article <3B0779F8.9198503D@pobox.com>, Anton Sherwood says...
> This is as good a context as any to ask ...
>
> In a lot of pix, there's a gray that looks unnaturally bright (and flat)
> to me; here, for example, it's in the White pieces on the left,
> particularly the two nearest. Is it my monitor, or JPEG, or what? Does
> anyone else see it?
>
>
It probably is your monitor, perhaps combined with the settings of your
display: when looked at in Photoshop those parts are not flat at all as
far as I can see. It might also be the image viewer used by your news
reader, perhaps..?
--
Regards, Sander
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> Anton Sherwood says...
> > In a lot of pix, there's a gray that looks unnaturally bright (and
> > flat) to me; here, for example, it's in the White pieces on the
> > left . . . . Is it my monitor, or JPEG, or what?
Sander wrote:
> It probably is your monitor, perhaps combined with the settings of
> your display: when looked at in Photoshop those parts are not flat
> at all as far as I can see. It might also be the image viewer used
> by your news reader, perhaps..?
Well, it's probably not the reader; it looks the same in ee and gimp.
--
Anton Sherwood -- br0### [at] p0b0xcom -- http://ogre.nu/
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
