On Thu, 25 Jan 2001 17:07:53 -0500, "Thomas Charron"
<tch### [at] ductapenet> wrote:

>    Whatcha think?  This is *VERY* preliminary work.  

Isn't this a ring mail?


Peter Popov ICQ : 15002700
Personal e-mail : pet### [at] vipbg
TAG      e-mail : pet### [at] tagpovrayorg

Post a reply to this message

>     Yep.  There are several kinds of 'weaves' you can use..  The one shown
> is a 4 in 1 weave.  I also have a mess around version that does a 6 in 1 and
> 8 in 1 weave.  I'm familiar with the weaves, and even messed around with
> making my own for a bit, but never finished it.  To boring, like Knitting,
> but with metal.. :-)

Do you have examples of other weaves?

Dan Johnson

Post a reply to this message

What does "WIP" mean? I have been wondering for several months now.
I couldn't resist anymore but ask.

-- 
char*i="b[7FK@`3NB6>B:b3O6>:B:b3O6><`3:;8:6f733:>::b?7B>:>^B>C73;S1";
main(_,c,m){for(m=32;c=*i++-49;c&m?puts(""):m)for(_=(
c/4)&7;putchar(m),_--?m:(_=(1<<(c&3))-1,(m^=3)&3););}    /*- Warp -*/

Post a reply to this message

Warp wrote:
> 
>   What does "WIP" mean? I have been wondering for several months now.
> I couldn't resist anymore but ask.

Work In Progress.

-- 
Francois Labreque | Make you a deal, I'll show you mine if you show 
    flabreque     | me yours.
        @         | 
   videotron.ca   |   - Pandora.

Post a reply to this message

On Thu, 25 Jan 2001 17:07:53 -0500, Thomas Charron wrote...
>     Whatcha think?  This is *VERY* preliminary work.  I may turn the chains
> into studded chain instead of just cut wire chain in the future.  This is
> just a quick render to see what it'd look like draped over a standard white
> pigment cylinder..  Any ideas to make the chain look more realistic?

Pretty good for standard 4:1 mesh.  For a real headache, try 6:1...

Not having read any other replies yet, I'd guess that you articulated the 
chain on a row by row basis?  This would mean that draping it over a 
sphere would be a) a pain in the gluteus maximus, or b) effectively 
impossible :)

Bye for now,
     Jamie.

Post a reply to this message

Jamie Davison <jam### [at] dh70qdu-netcom> wrote in message
news:MPG.14de9cd736f7392f989879@news.povray.org...
> On Thu, 25 Jan 2001 17:07:53 -0500, Thomas Charron wrote...
> >     Whatcha think?  This is *VERY* preliminary work.  I may turn the
chains
> > into studded chain instead of just cut wire chain in the future.  This
is
> > just a quick render to see what it'd look like draped over a standard
white
> > pigment cylinder..  Any ideas to make the chain look more realistic?
> Pretty good for standard 4:1 mesh.  For a real headache, try 6:1...

  HeHe..  Yep..  Pretty easy to work out, but, as you note below:

> Not having read any other replies yet, I'd guess that you articulated the
> chain on a row by row basis?  This would mean that draping it over a
> sphere would be a) a pain in the gluteus maximus, or b) effectively
> impossible :)

    Yep.  actually, it's on a column by column basis, but same difference.
As far as draping over a circle, yes, pretty much answer A), if not answer
B). .:-)

Post a reply to this message

Looks like standard SCA type cut-from-springs mail. The real stuff was
typicaly flatended at both ends of each link, then drilled and rivited
together. The SCA stuff is a lot faster to make, and probubly much
stronger than the iron wire used in the Middle Ages.

Ken Matassa

Post a reply to this message

On Tue, 30 Jan 2001 20:52:09 -0800, Ken Matassa wrote...
> Looks like standard SCA type cut-from-springs mail. The real stuff was
> typicaly flatended at both ends of each link, then drilled and rivited
> together. The SCA stuff is a lot faster to make, and probubly much
> stronger than the iron wire used in the Middle Ages.

It's undoubtedly quicker to make, but as to being stronger, I doubt it...

I found somewhere (I've lost the link) online a page comparing riveted 
versus twisted link mail.  I think they hit a dummy wearing the two types 
with a sword of some description.  With the riveted mail, some of the 
links bent a bit, but the structure stayed together, but with the twisted 
link mail, several links just sprung open, and left big holes in the 
mesh.

I found the page a few years ago when I was looking for basic directions 
on knitting mail so it may or may not still be out there.

Bye for now,
     Jamie.

Post a reply to this message

"Jamie Davison" <jam### [at] dh70qdu-netcom> wrote in message
news:MPG.14e28afe2f36d03598987d@news.povray.org...
> On Tue, 30 Jan 2001 20:52:09 -0800, Ken Matassa wrote...
> > Looks like standard SCA type cut-from-springs mail. The real stuff was
> > typicaly flatended at both ends of each link, then drilled and rivited
> > together. The SCA stuff is a lot faster to make, and probubly much
> > stronger than the iron wire used in the Middle Ages.
> I found somewhere (I've lost the link) online a page comparing riveted
> versus twisted link mail.  I think they hit a dummy wearing the two types
> with a sword of some description.  With the riveted mail, some of the
> links bent a bit, but the structure stayed together, but with the twisted
> link mail, several links just sprung open, and left big holes in the
> mesh.
> I found the page a few years ago when I was looking for basic directions
> on knitting mail so it may or may not still be out there.

    Several dozen sites out there, both for riveted and cut chain.  :-)
I've made some, and your right.  The problem is, with nonriveted mail, there
can be no transference of force accross the links.  The force cannot
disapate accross the links, and hence, a few links take full force.  :-)

Post a reply to this message

"Ken Matassa" <kma### [at] pacbellnet> wrote in message
news:3A7### [at] pacbellnet...
> Looks like standard SCA type cut-from-springs mail. The real stuff was
> typicaly flatended at both ends of each link, then drilled and rivited
> together. The SCA stuff is a lot faster to make, and probubly much
> stronger than the iron wire used in the Middle Ages.

    Yep, much faster to make, but more due to the fact that links can now be
made simply by bent wire.  :-)

    As far as stronger, heck no.  The alloys and the such used in the making
of the wire traditionaly used for making the links is put there to make the
wire maleable.  Thats bad when you want it to take a blow, becouse the force
cannot be distributed accross the links, but instead is absorbed by a few
links, usually breaking them..  :-(

Post a reply to this message