|
|
"Bob H." wrote:
>
> Got to admit this makes the unantialiased one look bad. It's just that sometimes AA
does a lot to make things
> fuzzy and blurred, esp. when using lower screen resolutions, and I liked the better
than 20-20 vision sort of
> thing.
> I've recently put my screen at 1600x1200 again (probably temporarily) so the non-AA
version still looks fair.
> Changed the sunlight direction for better terrain relief and shadows since that last
one. 3.5 hours to render.
> Oh, and the scene file is at p.t.s-f.
>
> Bob H.
I hate to pick your nits here, Bob, but would there really be that much
green vegetation with that much snow around ?
Otherwise a nice image :)
--
Ken Tyler - 1400+ POV-Ray, Graphics, 3D Rendering, and Raytracing Links:
http://home.pacbell.net/tylereng/index.html http://www.povray.org/links/
Post a reply to this message
|
|
|
|
"Ken" <tyl### [at] pacbellnet> wrote in message
news:3A69117D.BCB85FFE@pacbell.net...
>
> I hate to pick your nits here, Bob, but would there really be that much
> green vegetation with that much snow around ?
Pick away, then I'll just say it's elevation differences being the reason.
Much is grasses and evergreens anyway.
> Otherwise a nice image :)
Thanks Ken.
Bob H.
Post a reply to this message
|
|