 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Which shall I turn into a povray model?
1, 2, or 3?
As you can see, I got a scanner. :)
You'll be seeing a bit more of this sorta suff in the future.
--
H.E. Day
<><
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'hedscan1.JPG' (33 KB)
Download 'hedscan2.jpg' (78 KB)
Download 'hedscan3.jpg' (30 KB)
Preview of image 'hedscan1.JPG'
Preview of image 'hedscan2.jpg'
Preview of image 'hedscan3.jpg'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Number 3.
I wish my scanner worked when I wanted it to...
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
2
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
H. E. Day wrote in message <3a2099ac@news.povray.org>...
>Which shall I turn into a povray model?
>1, 2, or 3?
>
>As you can see, I got a scanner. :)
>You'll be seeing a bit more of this sorta suff in the future.
>
I vote for #1 !
please take a whole day to do it. since ytou can do great stuff in 2 hours,
you will do Incredible stuff in one day !
sulf
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
sulfugor wrote:
>
> I vote for #1 !
> please take a whole day to do it. since ytou can do great stuff in 2 hours,
> you will do Incredible stuff in one day !
>
:-)
But the assumption that quality of art increases linear with working time
is probably wrong.
I like #3 although it looks somehow 'twisted', i usually prefer x/y/z
views for my sketches, but i'm usually not doing such complicated models.
Christoph
--
Christoph Hormann <chr### [at] gmx de>
Homepage: http://www.schunter.etc.tu-bs.de/~chris/
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
I like #2 or #3. Heavy on the #2
"H. E. Day" wrote:
>
> Which shall I turn into a povray model?
> 1, 2, or 3?
>
> As you can see, I got a scanner. :)
> You'll be seeing a bit more of this sorta suff in the future.
>
> --
> H.E. Day
> <><
>
> [Image]
>
> [Image]
>
> [Image]
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"H. E. Day" wrote:
>
> Which shall I turn into a povray model?
> 1, 2, or 3?
2.
--
Francois Labreque | It is by caffeine alone I set my mind in motion, it
flabreque | is by the beans of Java that thoughts acquire speed,
@ | the hands acquire shaking, the shaking becomes a
videotron.ca | warning, it is by caffeine alone I set my mind in
| motion.
- Stolen from Badger's .sig file
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Pov### [at] aolcom (H. E. Day) wrote in <3a2099ac@news.povray.org>:
>Which shall I turn into a povray model?
>1, 2, or 3?
First do #3, then do #2, then do #1!!!! <smile>
--
Rich Allen
(Remove SPAM from my address to reply by e-mail)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
1, 2 AND 3.... :))
I like 1 most : looks like a wild animal ready to jump..
--
FD aka Freddy D. aka Prof D.
Pro### [at] wanadoofr
http://profd.est-ici.org
'... et n'oubliez pas d'éteindre en sortant. Merci !...'
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
1
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
1 - reminds me of the ratfink series of hotrods.
> Which shall I turn into a povray model?
> 1, 2, or 3?
>
> As you can see, I got a scanner. :)
> You'll be seeing a bit more of this sorta suff in the future.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Definately No. 1
:)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
1) looks like your recent Dessert Eagle
2) is fairly chunky but will undoubtedly improve if modeled
3) is very complicated but seems to have more promise.
So I would rank them in reverse order. 3 then 2 then 1...
--
``Accordingly, on behalf of the state elections
canvassing commission and in accordance with
the laws of the state of Florida, I hereby declare
Governor George W. Bush the winner of Florida's
25 electoral votes,'' Katherine Harris.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"H. E. Day" wrote:
>
> Which shall I turn into a povray model?
> 1, 2, or 3?
>
1 seems most interesting, if I understand correctly the shape you have in mind.
2 looks a bit too clumsy.
3 looks good, but rather "standard" starfighter.
So my vote goes to 1
--
Margus Ramst
Personal e-mail: mar### [at] peakeduee
TAG (Team Assistance Group) e-mail: mar### [at] tagpovrayorg
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
H. E. Day <Pov### [at] aolcom> wrote in message
news:3a2099ac@news.povray.org...
> Which shall I turn into a povray model?
> 1, 2, or 3?
>
Love no 3
Gail
--
********************************************************************
* gsh### [at] monotixcoza * System.dat not found. *
* http://www.rucus.ru.ac.za/~gail/ * Reformat hard drive Y)es O)k *
********************************************************************
* If at first you don't succeed, call it version 1.0 *
********************************************************************
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
3
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Number 2 may look clunky, but I think it would look amazing, set as a
humongous starship of some sort. Maybe with lots of #3s flying out from
the rear [bay] section...
Flux
"H. E. Day" wrote:
> Which shall I turn into a povray model?
> 1, 2, or 3?
>
> As you can see, I got a scanner. :)
> You'll be seeing a bit more of this sorta suff in the future.
>
> --
> H.E. Day
> <><
>
> [Image]
>
> [Image]
>
> [Image]
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
