Jim Charter wrote:
> much more valuable than general comments. If it's alright with you I> would like to use the same critical process with the other figures too.
No problem. I'm not an expert in this field. I just made some anatomical
drawings long time ago when I attended design studio :) Some of them you
can get here:
http://propro.ru/go/gallery/html/ru1994.html
> Generally I think my difficulty comes with the need to envision the> figures in more detail than is given in the painting. I am much more> mimetic than synthetic in artistic temperament.
I think you can use any reference painting for figures. We use original
Marlow's painting just as a reference. IMHO copying it stroke by stroke
is... too boring :) So any good improvisation will be very much appreciated :)
Gena.
From: Jim Charter
Subject: Re: Capriccio 17
Date: 2 Jun 2003 10:11:18
Message: <3edb5b06@news.povray.org>
Gena Obukhov wrote:
> I just made some anatomical
> drawings long time ago when I attended design studio :) Some of them you> can get here:> http://propro.ru/go/gallery/html/ru1994.html>
I have always admired your modelling ability, especially with figures.
I see now it is rooted in a sure sense of form and anatomy.
Gena Obukhov <obu### [at] mailcom> wrote in news:3EDADCC8.82821DB8@mail.com:
> Added some textures to the cathedral. The source is in p.b.s.-f.> > Gena.> >
I just wanted to say that this project is enjoyable even for the passive
observer. Keep up the great work everyone.
com> wrote in news: