 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
I have been rendering these during the last weeks in several parts, didn't
record the render time, but it was quite long.
Posters of the full size renders are available on zazzle:
http://www.zazzle.com/posters/gallery/product.asp?product%5Fid=70012958
http://www.zazzle.com/posters/gallery/product.asp?product%5Fid=70012962
http://www.zazzle.com/posters/gallery/product.asp?product%5Fid=70012964
The simulation is done with my mechanics simulation patch (still in work,
see the animations in p.b.a.) - guess how many spheres...
Christoph
--
POV-Ray tutorials, IsoWood include,
TransSkin and more: http://www.tu-bs.de/~y0013390/
Last updated 13 Aug. 2002 _____./\/^>_*_<^\/\.______
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'balls1_512.jpg' (19 KB)
Download 'balls2_512.jpg' (27 KB)
Download 'balls3_512.jpg' (27 KB)
Preview of image 'balls1_512.jpg'
Preview of image 'balls2_512.jpg'
Preview of image 'balls3_512.jpg'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Christoph Hormann wrote:
>
> I have been rendering these during the last weeks in several parts, didn't
> record the render time, but it was quite long.
So you're not going to try it as a blob? :)
--
-Jide
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> I have been rendering these during the last weeks in several parts, didn't
> record the render time, but it was quite long.
>
> Posters of the full size renders are available on zazzle:
>
> http://www.zazzle.com/posters/gallery/product.asp?product%5Fid=70012958
> http://www.zazzle.com/posters/gallery/product.asp?product%5Fid=70012962
> http://www.zazzle.com/posters/gallery/product.asp?product%5Fid=70012964
>
> The simulation is done with my mechanics simulation patch (still in work,
> see the animations in p.b.a.) - guess how many spheres...
Many.
;)
Jamie.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
wow! that looks marvellous!
Christoph Hormann wrote:
> I have been rendering these during the last weeks in several parts, didn't
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Where's the animation?????????? :)
Fernando.
"Christoph Hormann" <chr### [at] gmx de> escribió en el mensaje
news:3D9B5518.2EA64EA3@gmx.de...
>
> I have been rendering these during the last weeks in several parts, didn't
> record the render time, but it was quite long.
>
> Posters of the full size renders are available on zazzle:
>
> http://www.zazzle.com/posters/gallery/product.asp?product%5Fid=70012958
> http://www.zazzle.com/posters/gallery/product.asp?product%5Fid=70012962
> http://www.zazzle.com/posters/gallery/product.asp?product%5Fid=70012964
>
> The simulation is done with my mechanics simulation patch (still in work,
> see the animations in p.b.a.) - guess how many spheres...
>
> Christoph
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
This looks great! I too would like to see the animation. When you say "quite
long time" I suppose you mean hours for the calculation of the balls? If so,
this must be because the 3 frames need to calculate all the steps
in-between.. So an animation would be faster.
The laws of physisc suggests that the pyramid would collapse on it's own.
How did you make it stand and still blow up realistically when the big ball
hits? Maybe this is very simple. But I wonder how you implement the laws and
at the same time, not implement them.
As always, I'm looking forward to see your system is released.
Regards
Hugo
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Very nice indeed!!!
Is it just me or are the sphere's getting smaller? and if so why?
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Hugo wrote:
>
> This looks great! I too would like to see the animation. When you say "quite
> long time" I suppose you mean hours for the calculation of the balls? If so,
> this must be because the 3 frames need to calculate all the steps
> in-between.. So an animation would be faster.
Bah, it's not the simulation that's slow but the rendering.
> The laws of physisc suggests that the pyramid would collapse on it's own.
> How did you make it stand and still blow up realistically when the big ball
> hits? Maybe this is very simple.
It is, you just have to throw the ball fast enough to hit the pyramid
before it collapses. The pyramid balls are standing still at the
beginning while the large ball is moving at high speed. The whole time
covered by the three pictures in not even a second.
Christoph
--
POV-Ray tutorials, IsoWood include,
TransSkin and more: http://www.tu-bs.de/~y0013390/
Last updated 13 Aug. 2002 _____./\/^>_*_<^\/\.______
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Fernando González del Cueto" wrote:
>
> Where's the animation?????????? :)
>
Not yet there (will see when i have time to make it).
Christoph
--
POV-Ray tutorials, IsoWood include,
TransSkin and more: http://www.tu-bs.de/~y0013390/
Last updated 13 Aug. 2002 _____./\/^>_*_<^\/\.______
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
benp wrote:
>
> wow! that looks marvellous!
>
Thank you.
Christoph
--
POV-Ray tutorials, IsoWood include,
TransSkin and more: http://www.tu-bs.de/~y0013390/
Last updated 13 Aug. 2002 _____./\/^>_*_<^\/\.______
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Thomas van der Veen wrote:
>
> Very nice indeed!!!
Thanks.
> Is it just me or are the sphere's getting smaller? and if so why?
>
Because the camera is changed.
Christoph
--
POV-Ray tutorials, IsoWood include,
TransSkin and more: http://www.tu-bs.de/~y0013390/
Last updated 13 Aug. 2002 _____./\/^>_*_<^\/\.______
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Christoph Hormann <chr### [at] gmxde> wrote in
news:3D9C2E2C.A083D6FB@gmx.de:
> Because the camera is changed.
Ah I see, any particular reason for doing that?
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Thomas van der Veen wrote:
>
> > Because the camera is changed.
>
> Ah I see, any particular reason for doing that?
>
If not either the first one would heve beeen very small or in the last one
the more distant parts would be cut off.
Christoph
--
POV-Ray tutorials, IsoWood include,
TransSkin and more: http://www.tu-bs.de/~y0013390/
Last updated 13 Aug. 2002 _____./\/^>_*_<^\/\.______
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Christoph Hormann <chr### [at] gmxde> wrote in
news:3D9C3273.6ACB53A9@gmx.de:
> If not either the first one would heve beeen very small or in the last
> one the more distant parts would be cut off.
I just had a good look at the pictures and I realised that's the case. DUH.
But thanks for answering anyway!
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Christoph Hormann wrote:
>
> I have been rendering these during the last weeks in several parts, didn't
> record the render time, but it was quite long.
>
> Posters of the full size renders are available on zazzle:
>
> http://www.zazzle.com/posters/gallery/product.asp?product%5Fid=70012958
> http://www.zazzle.com/posters/gallery/product.asp?product%5Fid=70012962
> http://www.zazzle.com/posters/gallery/product.asp?product%5Fid=70012964
>
> The simulation is done with my mechanics simulation patch (still in work,
> see the animations in p.b.a.) - guess how many spheres...
Let us know when the animated posters are available :)
--
Ken Tyler
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> guess how many spheres...
4060 + 1?
Tom.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Tom Bates wrote:
>
> > guess how many spheres...
>
> 4060 + 1?
>
Wrong.
Christoph
--
POV-Ray tutorials, IsoWood include,
TransSkin and more: http://www.tu-bs.de/~y0013390/
Last updated 13 Aug. 2002 _____./\/^>_*_<^\/\.______
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> The simulation is done with my mechanics simulation patch (still in work,
> see the animations in p.b.a.) - guess how many spheres...
Assuming a) a perfect tetrahedral setup with 30 layers and
b) I can count (not necessarily a good bet)
Then I would hazard a guess at 4960 small spheres and one big one, and
possibly a sky_sphere too :)
Jamie.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Jamie Davison wrote:
>
> Assuming a) a perfect tetrahedral setup with 30 layers and
> b) I can count (not necessarily a good bet)
>
> Then I would hazard a guess at 4960 small spheres and one big one, and
> possibly a sky_sphere too :)
Wrong.
The mistake you are making is assuming the bottom front line you see is
the bottom line of balls of the original tetraeder - it isn't because the
whole thing is falling.
In fact there are 5985 spheres.
Christoph
--
POV-Ray tutorials, IsoWood include,
TransSkin and more: http://www.tu-bs.de/~y0013390/
Last updated 13 Aug. 2002 _____./\/^>_*_<^\/\.______
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> > Assuming a) a perfect tetrahedral setup with 30 layers and
> > b) I can count (not necessarily a good bet)
> >
> > Then I would hazard a guess at 4960 small spheres and one big one, and
> > possibly a sky_sphere too :)
>
> Wrong.
Objection Yeronner!
Going by the assumptions I elaborated, I think I was correct. You never
said I had toplay by your rules :P
> The mistake you are making is assuming the bottom front line you see is
> the bottom line of balls of the original tetraeder - it isn't because the
> whole thing is falling.
>
> In fact there are 5985 spheres.
Bah! I'm not playing this game any more! <grin>
Jamie.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> > > Assuming a) a perfect tetrahedral setup with 30 layers and
> > > b) I can count (not necessarily a good bet)
> > >
> > > Then I would hazard a guess at 4960 small spheres and one big one, and
> > > possibly a sky_sphere too :)
> >
> > Wrong.
>
> Objection Yeronner!
>
> Going by the assumptions I elaborated, I think I was correct. You never
> said I had toplay by your rules :P
>
> > The mistake you are making is assuming the bottom front line you see is
> > the bottom line of balls of the original tetraeder - it isn't because the
> > whole thing is falling.
> >
> > In fact there are 5985 spheres.
>
> Bah! I'm not playing this game any more! <grin>
>
> Jamie.
I counted 28 rows up the side.
You counted 30 rows across the bottom.
Apparently he used 32.
I should have guessed.
After all, we are (mostly) all programmers aren't we?
}:8}
Tom Bates.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> > Bah! I'm not playing this game any more! <grin>
> >
> > Jamie.
>
> I counted 28 rows up the side.
> You counted 30 rows across the bottom.
> Apparently he used 32.
> I should have guessed.
> After all, we are (mostly) all programmers aren't we?
> }:8}
Who, me, a programmer???
Not in the slightest. I use Moray :)
Jamie.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
