No post-processing here. Pure POV :) Perhaps you can raise the irid 
value by 3 tenths. That's where all the color is coming from.

Alf Peake wrote:

> I'm a sucker for these gaudy pics. Very nice. Any post-processing? I
> tried the scene you posted for the previous version but colours were
> not as bright as your posted pic.
> 
> Alf
> 
> 
> 
> 


-- 
Samuel Benge

sbe### [at] caltelcom

Post a reply to this message

Can't really tell. I didn't mark it down last night. I'm doing a larger 
version now, so I'll know the render time and post it with the image.

Rick [Kitty5] wrote:

> beautiful, whats the render time?
> 
> 
> --
> Rick
> 
> Kitty5 WebDesign - http://Kitty5.com
> POV-Ray News & Resources - http://Povray.co.uk
> TEL : +44 (01270) 501101 - FAX : +44 (01270) 251105 - ICQ : 15776037
> 
> PGP Public Key
> http://pgpkeys.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x231E1CEA
> 
> 
> ---
> 
> Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
> Version: 6.0.370 / Virus Database: 205 - Release Date: 05/06/2002
> 
> 
> 


-- 
Samuel Benge

sbe### [at] caltelcom

Post a reply to this message

Here's the desktop image. Render time was 18m 8s. Might have been 
faster, but I'm pretty sure I was using too high a max_trace_level. Code 
has been sent to povray.text.scene-files
Happy POV-ing!

Samuel Benge wrote:

> Okay, 2nd time posting now... Almost posted it on the 6th! I really do 
> need to get the next RC, if there is one :)
> Same scene as before, except with a few enhancements. Questions, comments?
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 


-- 
Samuel Benge

sbe### [at] caltelcom

Post a reply to this message

Attachments:
Download 'fract_ref2.jpg' (229 KB)

Preview of image 'fract_ref2.jpg'

On Sun, 09 Jun 2002 22:34:51 -0700, Samuel Benge wrote:
 
> Okay, 2nd time posting now... Almost posted it on the 6th! I really do 
> need to get the next RC, if there is one :)
> Same scene as before, except with a few enhancements. Questions, comments?

This looks great. 

-- 
sphere{z*5,1pigment{rgb.5}finish{reflection.3specular.5}}box{<-50,-3,-50>
<50,-2,50>pigment{checker/*\__\\__/  * \_\\__*/scale 2}finish{ambient.7}}
light_source/*__\\__\\__\\__\\__\(    ~ )\__\\__\\__\\__\\*/{<2,5,1>*4,1} 
/*\\__\\__\\__\\__\\__\\__\\__\\__\~  -/__\\__\\__\\__\\__\\*//* Steve */

Post a reply to this message

magic stuff!  brilliant.

"Samuel Benge" <sbe### [at] caltelcom> wrote in message
news:3D0### [at] caltelcom...
> Okay, 2nd time posting now... Almost posted it on the 6th! I really do
> need to get the next RC, if there is one :)
> Same scene as before, except with a few enhancements. Questions, comments?
>
> --
> Samuel Benge
>
> sbe### [at] caltelcom
>


----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----

Post a reply to this message

While this is as beatiful as your last one, for some reason I like the other one
better. I like the enhanced ior here though. Maybe it's the size of the light.
Is it a case of one begetting the other, or did you rearrange things a little?

--
light_source{0,1}#macro c(J,a)sphere{0,1pigment{rgb z}scale a translate J+O}
#end#macro B(R,V,O)c(0,4)intersection{c(V,R)difference{c(-z*4x+10)c(-z*4.1x+
10)c(0<7.5,45,5>)}}#end B(12,0z*25)B(8y*4<0,12,50>)          // Batronyx ^"^

Post a reply to this message

Very nice pic ! May miss some depth though. It looks a bit flat to me.
Reminds me of the "light at the end of the tunnel"


3D0### [at] caltelcom...
> Okay, 2nd time posting now... Almost posted it on the 6th! I really do
> need to get the next RC, if there is one :)
> Same scene as before, except with a few enhancements. Questions, comments?
>
> --
> Samuel Benge
>
> sbe### [at] caltelcom
>


----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----

Post a reply to this message

sylvain.louret wrote:

> Very nice pic ! May miss some depth though. It looks a bit flat to me.
> Reminds me of the "light at the end of the tunnel"

The real thing or is there an image with that name?


-- 
Samuel Benge

sbe### [at] caltelcom

Post a reply to this message