 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Beautiful pic. That red makes me go all peculiar. Last time that
happened was with a bunch of red tulips posted a while back.
Alf
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
What do you mean with peculiar? Is it good or bad?
Alf Peake wrote:
> Beautiful pic. That red makes me go all peculiar. Last time that
> happened was with a bunch of red tulips posted a while back.
>
> Alf
--
Tim Nikias
Homepage: http://www.digitaltwilight.de/no_lights/index.html
Email: Tim### [at] gmx de
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Tim Nikias" <tim### [at] gmxde> wrote in message
news:3CD5132F.1C9733A1@gmx.de...
> What do you mean with peculiar? Is it good or bad?
Little red dresses (I'm not into black :))
Grabs your eyeballs.
An OK pic.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Hm. Well, then watch your eyeballs! :-)
Alf Peake wrote:
> "Tim Nikias" <tim### [at] gmxde> wrote in message
> news:3CD5132F.1C9733A1@gmx.de...
> > What do you mean with peculiar? Is it good or bad?
>
> Little red dresses (I'm not into black :))
> Grabs your eyeballs.
> An OK pic.
--
Tim Nikias
Homepage: http://www.digitaltwilight.de/no_lights/index.html
Email: Tim### [at] gmxde
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
I deleted the giant-scale-image again.
Just wanted the newsgroups to know...
--
Tim Nikias
Homepage: http://www.digitaltwilight.de/no_lights/index.html
Email: Tim### [at] gmxde
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
pity, I was thinking of downloading it and having it printed
on a photoprinter. You know a 300 dpi 24 bits color each pixel
on photographic paper.
Andrel
Tim Nikias wrote:
>
> I deleted the giant-scale-image again.
> Just wanted the newsgroups to know...
>
> --
> Tim Nikias
> Homepage: http://www.digitaltwilight.de/no_lights/index.html
> Email: Tim### [at] gmxde
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
andrel linnenbank wrote:
> You know a 300 dpi 24 bits color each pixel
> on photographic paper.
A printer that can do 24 bit colour would be excessively
cumbersome; most printers use 2 bit colour (cyan, magenta,
yellow, black). Some high-end printers have some extra
colours such as green, but even those don't even come close
to 24 bit...it's all simulated. Besides, you can find 2400
dpi printers these days for not too much effort.
--
Tim Cook
http://empyrean.scifi-fantasy.com
mirror: http://personal.lig.bellsouth.net/lig/z/9/z993126
-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.12
GFA dpu- s: a?-- C++(++++) U P? L E--- W++(+++)>$
N++ o? K- w(+) O? M-(--) V? PS+(+++) PE(--) Y(--)
PGP-(--) t* 5++>+++++ X+ R* tv+ b++(+++) DI
D++(---) G(++) e*>++ h+ !r--- !y--
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Timothy R. Cook" wrote:
>
> andrel linnenbank wrote:
> > You know a 300 dpi 24 bits color each pixel
> > on photographic paper.
>
> A printer that can do 24 bit colour would be excessively
> cumbersome; most printers use 2 bit colour (cyan, magenta,
> yellow, black). Some high-end printers have some extra
> colours such as green, but even those don't even come close
> to 24 bit...it's all simulated. Besides, you can find 2400
> dpi printers these days for not too much effort.
It is not cumbersome, it is just a printer, except that it
will print om photographic paper. put another way it is just
a normal photo (a4 or letter format) no dithering or else
involved. I do have a 2400 dpi color printer myself and it
will produce photo-like pictures as long as you do not look
at it from less the 50cm.
Andrel
> --
> Tim Cook
> http://empyrean.scifi-fantasy.com
> mirror: http://personal.lig.bellsouth.net/lig/z/9/z993126
>
> -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
> Version: 3.12
> GFA dpu- s: a?-- C++(++++) U P? L E--- W++(+++)>$
> N++ o? K- w(+) O? M-(--) V? PS+(+++) PE(--) Y(--)
> PGP-(--) t* 5++>+++++ X+ R* tv+ b++(+++) DI
> D++(---) G(++) e*>++ h+ !r--- !y--
> ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
