|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
I've stuffed some trigonometrics on the spiral-sphere, posted by Chaps on
Oct 4. Instead of the 2+ hours of rendering, the 1024x768 AA0.3 version of
this one took me 2d17h38m27s to render, with a record max_gradient of 247
(still on the Celeron 600Mhz, 128MB RAM, WinMe I have at work).
Does it bring William Blake to anyone else's mind, or am I just being way
too self-indulgent?
Ruy
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'func640.jpg' (23 KB)
Preview of image 'func640.jpg'
![func640.jpg](/povray.binaries.images/attachment/%3C3bc5dbef%40news.povray.org%3E/func640.jpg?preview=1)
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
I like this "2D" effect.
I just tried the version proposed by R. Suzuki, it seems to be much faster,
I'll try it during weekend and try to understand. Anyway I got a new PC at
home much faster: less than 3h :o)))))
Chaps.
"Ruy" <ruy### [at] hipernet com br> wrote in message
news:3bc5dbef@news.povray.org...
> I've stuffed some trigonometrics on the spiral-sphere, posted by Chaps on
> Oct 4. Instead of the 2+ hours of rendering, the 1024x768 AA0.3 version of
> this one took me 2d17h38m27s to render, with a record max_gradient of 247
> (still on the Celeron 600Mhz, 128MB RAM, WinMe I have at work).
>
> Does it bring William Blake to anyone else's mind, or am I just being way
> too self-indulgent?
>
> Ruy
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |