 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
i don't recall seeing the original, but this is very good. especially the
water.
>
> Here is a 3.5 translated and enhanced version of the splash image. I
> thought that having a 3.1 scene as splash for the 3.5 version was rather
> retrograde. Translation was easy: change #version 3.1 to 3.5. :) But I
> also "enhanced" it by replacing the old tricks with the new features:
>
> + Water texture uses now variable reflection and interior fade
> + The tricky underwater fog is replaced with scattering media
> + Removed the "camera-mounted" light and used evenly distributed
> lights on the sky
>
> All the other differences must come from different behavior on 3.5
> (like noise generator). I still need to adapt the gradient for the wet
> zone on the rocks, but what do you think? Do you like it better than the
> current splash? Or perhaps I lost the original "spirit"?
>
> --
> Jaime Vives Piqueres
>
> La Persistencia de la Ignorancia
> http://www.ignorancia.org/
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Is your new scene file available? I would love to see that rendered
1280x1024 for wallpaper. It looks much mroe realistic than the original.
"Jaime Vives Piqueres" <jai### [at] ignorancia org> wrote in message
news:3B9CC515.A3122E79@ignorancia.org...
> Hi:
>
> Here is a 3.5 translated and enhanced version of the splash image. I
> thought that having a 3.1 scene as splash for the 3.5 version was rather
> retrograde. Translation was easy: change #version 3.1 to 3.5. :) But I
> also "enhanced" it by replacing the old tricks with the new features:
>
> + Water texture uses now variable reflection and interior fade
> + The tricky underwater fog is replaced with scattering media
> + Removed the "camera-mounted" light and used evenly distributed
> lights on the sky
>
> All the other differences must come from different behavior on 3.5
> (like noise generator). I still need to adapt the gradient for the wet
> zone on the rocks, but what do you think? Do you like it better than the
> current splash? Or perhaps I lost the original "spirit"?
>
> --
> Jaime Vives Piqueres
>
> La Persistencia de la Ignorancia
> http://www.ignorancia.org/
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
I think the water looks much better, but in the lower left hand
corner the water level on 2 of the rocks is very dark.
--
Phil
...coffee?...yes please! extra sugar,extra cream...Thank you.
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'wsplash.jpg' (26 KB)
Preview of image 'wsplash.jpg'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Jaime Vives Piqueres" <jai### [at] ignoranciaorg> wrote in message
news:3B9CC515.A3122E79@ignorancia.org...
> Hi:
>
> Here is a 3.5 translated and enhanced version of the splash image. I
> thought that having a 3.1 scene as splash for the 3.5 version was rather
> retrograde. Translation was easy: change #version 3.1 to 3.5. :) But I
> also "enhanced" it by replacing the old tricks with the new features:
>
> All the other differences must come from different behavior on 3.5
> (like noise generator). I still need to adapt the gradient for the wet
> zone on the rocks, but what do you think? Do you like it better than the
> current splash? Or perhaps I lost the original "spirit"?
>
I never saw the previous version but I must say I like this one :) I'll have
to grab 3.5 very soon, I think :)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
I've compared the two versions closely, and I definitely prefer the old
version.
In the new version the stones look completely dry IMO, while they had that
wonderful realistic wet look in the old version. Also, the water looks fake
in the new version compared to the old. Things below the surface of the
water are much more clear in the new version (not good) and it's more
difficult to see where the surface of the water actually is.
Rune
--
3D images and anims, include files, tutorials and more:
Rune's World: http://rsj.mobilixnet.dk (updated June 26)
POV-Ray Users: http://rsj.mobilixnet.dk/povrayusers/
POV-Ray Webring: http://webring.povray.co.uk
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
The rocks look like someone's blistered skin, a bit too pink and
the they seem to have much more rounded features compared
to the original.
Water, fish and rocks under water look great.
--
Cheers
Steve email mailto:ste### [at] zeroppsuklinuxnet
%HAV-A-NICEDAY Error not enough coffee 0 pps.
web http://www.zeropps.uklinux.net/
or http://start.at/zero-pps
11:17pm up 1:30, 2 users, load average: 1.00, 1.01, 1.02
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Jaime Vives Piqueres" <jai### [at] ignoranciaorg> wrote in message
news:3B9CC515.A3122E79@ignorancia.org...
> Hi:
>
> Here is a 3.5 translated and enhanced version of the splash image. I
> thought that having a 3.1 scene as splash for the 3.5 version was rather
> retrograde. Translation was easy: change #version 3.1 to 3.5. :) But I
> also "enhanced" it by replacing the old tricks with the new features:
>
> + Water texture uses now variable reflection and interior fade
> + The tricky underwater fog is replaced with scattering media
> + Removed the "camera-mounted" light and used evenly distributed
> lights on the sky
>
> All the other differences must come from different behavior on 3.5
> (like noise generator). I still need to adapt the gradient for the wet
> zone on the rocks, but what do you think? Do you like it better than the
> current splash? Or perhaps I lost the original "spirit"?
>
> --
> Jaime Vives Piqueres
>
> La Persistencia de la Ignorancia
> http://www.ignorancia.org/
While I see some of the problems others have already mentioned (particularly the
water-line on the rocks), it still looks like an award-winning image to me :)
--
Batronyx ^"^
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> All the other differences must come from different behavior on 3.5
> (like noise generator). I still need to adapt the gradient for the
wet
> zone on the rocks, but what do you think? Do you like it better than
the
> current splash? Or perhaps I lost the original "spirit"?
Thank you, now I can see the splashscreen without hitting Alt-B over
and over (because in tends to disappear in a few seconds).
I think the water should look more blueish - the current splash's
water is more blue, and I liked it that way.
Nevertheless, its a much better splash than the one of Povray 3.1
IMHO.
cukk
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Jaime,
Please share the source, I've been trying to get a
realistic water with POV 3.5 and have not had
much success.
Thanks,
Harold
"Jaime Vives Piqueres" <jai### [at] ignoranciaorg> wrote in message
news:3B9CC515.A3122E79@ignorancia.org...
> Hi:
>
> Here is a 3.5 translated and enhanced version of the splash image. I
> thought that having a 3.1 scene as splash for the 3.5 version was rather
> retrograde. Translation was easy: change #version 3.1 to 3.5. :) But I
> also "enhanced" it by replacing the old tricks with the new features:
>
> + Water texture uses now variable reflection and interior fade
> + The tricky underwater fog is replaced with scattering media
> + Removed the "camera-mounted" light and used evenly distributed
> lights on the sky
>
> All the other differences must come from different behavior on 3.5
> (like noise generator). I still need to adapt the gradient for the wet
> zone on the rocks, but what do you think? Do you like it better than the
> current splash? Or perhaps I lost the original "spirit"?
>
> --
> Jaime Vives Piqueres
>
> La Persistencia de la Ignorancia
> http://www.ignorancia.org/
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Well, I've started again to satisfy everyone (my self included). Now it
is more like the original, but renders on 3.5 and has some of the new
features, like variable reflection and photons. It still has the
underwater tricky fog (I've not managed to get media creating the same
effect). As the image is now 1024x768, I linked here two versions with
different quality:
http://www.ignorancia.org/images/splash75.jpg
http://www.ignorancia.org/images/splash95.jpg
I will post the code after some more adjusting...
P.S.: Harold, for a sample of 3.5 water see my last post on this group
and also on p.b.s-f.
--
Jaime Vives Piqueres
La Persistencia de la Ignorancia
http://www.ignorancia.org/
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
