From: Josh English
Subject: Re: Post processing for sky radiosity (90k)
Date: 23 Aug 2001 15:24:47
Message: <3B855819.BB4860D0@spiritone.com>
Kari Kivisalo wrote:
> Just testing really. Have to learn more about outdoors> photometric conditions before doing it properly.>> _____________> Kari Kivisalo>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------> [Image]
Just for comparison, can you post (here or on your site) the same image
rendered without radiosity at all, then with radiosity, then with radiosity
and your post processing? It would easier for me to see what is going on if I
can see the difference in the images.
--
Josh English
eng### [at] spiritonecom
The POV-Ray Cyclopedia http://www.spiritone.com/~english/cyclopedia/
From: Kari Kivisalo
Subject: Re: Post processing for sky radiosity (90k)
Date: 23 Aug 2001 20:50:01
Message: <3B85A56A.9AE5DE68@engineer.com>
> It would easier for me to see what is going on if I> can see the difference in the images.
Before post image http://www.pp.htv.fi/kkivisal/sky2.jpg
It really is just a quick test using estimated sun/sky
energy ratio.
It seems that not much can be done with the transfer
curve at least in this scene.
_____________
Kari Kivisalo
com
The POV-Ray Cyclopedia http://www.spiritone.com/~english/cyclopedia/