 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Very very impressive. It's amazing how good a "simple" isosurface can look :)
Can you post the source please? I'd love to have a look at the isosurface and
radiosity settings.
--
Tek
http://www.evilsuperbrain.com
Christoph Hormann <chr### [at] gmx de> wrote in message
news:3B4B6914.A2A00614@gmx.de...
>
> I again started making some experiments with isosurfaces and radiosity,
> now with a new faster computer that's much more fun than before, but still
> quite slow.
>
> The isosurface function is fairly simple, a 'blob' from a plane and a
> sphere with an agate pigment function added.
>
> The radiosity quality settings are quite high, probably could reduce count
> to some extend without visible artefacts. The scene took 52 hours to
> render at this size, statistics showed an incredible amount of 105 billion
> DNoise calls, again a sign that current isosurface code is far from being
> efficient with slow isosurface functions.
>
> Christoph
>
> --
> Christoph Hormann <chr### [at] gmxde>
> IsoWood include, radiosity tutorial, TransSkin and other
> things on: http://www.schunter.etc.tu-bs.de/~chris/
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Yike!
source now dammit !!
--
Rick
Kitty5 WebDesign - http://Kitty5.com
Hi-Impact database driven web site design & e-commerce
TEL : +44 (01625) 266358 - FAX : +44 (01625) 611913 - ICQ : 15776037
POV-Ray News & Resources - http://Povray.co.uk
PGP Public Key
http://pgpkeys.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x231E1CEA
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
David Fontaine wrote:
>
> That's very realistic!
Agreed.
> Looks like some sort of mineral deposit from a hot spring.
Except mineral deposits don't hover in mid-air!
--
Francois Labreque | Unfortunately, there's no such thing as a snooze
flabreque | button on a cat who wants breakfast.
@ | - Unattributed quote from rec.humor.funny
videotron.ca
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'rad_iso_02.jpg' (49 KB)
Preview of image 'rad_iso_02.jpg'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
No less than incredible. A *real* beautiful render.
Bob H.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Francois Labreque" <fla### [at] videotronca> wrote in message
news:3B4B9ECB.2C0D7F43@videotron.ca...
>
> Except mineral deposits don't hover in mid-air!
Who threw that rock?
Excellent btw.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: Christoph Hormann
Subject: Re: isosurface & radiosity test (86k)
Date: 11 Jul 2001 05:57:13
Message: <3B4C237A.61B78706@gmx.de>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
David Fontaine wrote:
>
> That's very realistic!
Thanks!
> Looks like some sort of mineral deposit from a
> hot spring.
>
Maybe, but there isn't any water around...
For rocks, it's much too smooth, probably. Will have to work on that...
Christoph
--
Christoph Hormann <chr### [at] gmxde>
IsoWood include, radiosity tutorial, TransSkin and other
things on: http://www.schunter.etc.tu-bs.de/~chris/
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: Christoph Hormann
Subject: Re: isosurface & radiosity test (86k)
Date: 11 Jul 2001 05:57:30
Message: <3B4C238C.FBBDC4A0@gmx.de>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Thomas Lake wrote:
>
> Aww come on, no fair, your not supposed to post photos in here!:-)
It's really fairly simple, lighting worked quite well, but the geometry is
far from being realistic.
Christoph
--
Christoph Hormann <chr### [at] gmxde>
IsoWood include, radiosity tutorial, TransSkin and other
things on: http://www.schunter.etc.tu-bs.de/~chris/
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: Christoph Hormann
Subject: Re: isosurface & radiosity test (86k)
Date: 11 Jul 2001 06:00:38
Message: <3B4C2447.60FCC2EB@gmx.de>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Francois Labreque wrote:
>
> > Looks like some sort of mineral deposit from a hot spring.
>
> Except mineral deposits don't hover in mid-air!
>
:-)
That's a general problem with isosurfaces, you often can't prevent parts
to separate from the surface.
Christoph
--
Christoph Hormann <chr### [at] gmxde>
IsoWood include, radiosity tutorial, TransSkin and other
things on: http://www.schunter.etc.tu-bs.de/~chris/
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: Christoph Hormann
Subject: Re: isosurface & radiosity test (86k)
Date: 11 Jul 2001 06:02:10
Message: <3B4C24A3.AF33AFA1@gmx.de>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Tom Melly wrote:
>
> Who threw that rock?
That was me (or Mr. noise generator if you want so)
>
> Excellent btw.
Thank you.
Christoph
--
Christoph Hormann <chr### [at] gmxde>
IsoWood include, radiosity tutorial, TransSkin and other
things on: http://www.schunter.etc.tu-bs.de/~chris/
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: Christoph Hormann
Subject: Re: isosurface & radiosity test (86k)
Date: 11 Jul 2001 06:04:39
Message: <3B4C2538.F63402AE@gmx.de>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Sean Johnson wrote:
>
> Amazing results.. All 52 hours counted on this image!
Thanks, but 52 hours for a simple test scene are really quite a lot IMO.
Christoph
--
Christoph Hormann <chr### [at] gmxde>
IsoWood include, radiosity tutorial, TransSkin and other
things on: http://www.schunter.etc.tu-bs.de/~chris/
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
