The wonderful thing about this image is the "actual transparentness" of the
water: pleasing value-add realism.

Christoph Hormann wrote:

> Not sure if this is much improved, but it is much slower now: about 75

> the upper bricks.
>
> I dimmed the light a bit, but it turns out to be quite dark now.
> Radiosity quality is even lower than before so the shadow parts look quite
> messy.
>
> I really need a faster computer...
>
> Christoph
>
> --
> Christoph Hormann <chr### [at] gmxde>
> IsoWood include, radiosity tutorial, TransSkin and other
> things on: http://www.schunter.etc.tu-bs.de/~chris/
>

Post a reply to this message

"Greg M. Johnson" wrote:
> 
> The wonderful thing about this image is the "actual transparentness" of the
> water: pleasing value-add realism.
> 

I actually don't really like the under water part that much, it looks too
uniform IMO.  Sadly refractive photons don't work well here as mentioned
before.  

Christoph

-- 
Christoph Hormann <chr### [at] gmxde>
IsoWood include, radiosity tutorial, TransSkin and other 
things on: http://www.schunter.etc.tu-bs.de/~chris/

Post a reply to this message