|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
The wonderful thing about this image is the "actual transparentness" of the
water: pleasing value-add realism.
Christoph Hormann wrote:
> Not sure if this is much improved, but it is much slower now: about 75
> the upper bricks.
>
> I dimmed the light a bit, but it turns out to be quite dark now.
> Radiosity quality is even lower than before so the shadow parts look quite
> messy.
>
> I really need a faster computer...
>
> Christoph
>
> --
> Christoph Hormann <chr### [at] gmx de>
> IsoWood include, radiosity tutorial, TransSkin and other
> things on: http://www.schunter.etc.tu-bs.de/~chris/
>
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
"Greg M. Johnson" wrote:
>
> The wonderful thing about this image is the "actual transparentness" of the
> water: pleasing value-add realism.
>
I actually don't really like the under water part that much, it looks too
uniform IMO. Sadly refractive photons don't work well here as mentioned
before.
Christoph
--
Christoph Hormann <chr### [at] gmx de>
IsoWood include, radiosity tutorial, TransSkin and other
things on: http://www.schunter.etc.tu-bs.de/~chris/
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |