 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
First, thanks for the feedback! Interesting to note that what looks ok
on my LCD monitor is probably too light on a CRT.
Primary tweak was trying to improve the bluish "depth cue" on the
mountains. Still not satisfactory - technique requires further
consideration. My intention was to be able to apply a fog or haze effect
to individual objects instead of globally.
Tried applying cloud shadows, but the view orientation is poor and the
effect is only very subtle.
As a composition I can see where my lack of decision on scale confuses
things. However, I don't intend to do too much more on this particular
pic since it is after all an
exercise.
Abe
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'landscape1b.jpg' (72 KB)
Preview of image 'landscape1b.jpg'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> This is much better. The background hills now look convensing. Looking
> forward to you next iteration.
Ken Matassa
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
This take is much much better. The mountain in the distance looks more
realistic.
Josh
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
ditto
Joshua English wrote:
>
> This take is much much better. The mountain in the distance looks more
> realistic.
>
> Josh
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Abe" <bul### [at] taconic net> wrote in message
news:3AD25016.B35D9951@taconic.net...
> First, thanks for the feedback! Interesting to note that what looks ok
> on my LCD monitor is probably too light on a CRT.
Doesn't look too bright here... and I must say that if I didn't know what
software you were using, my first thougth would have been Terragen.
-- Nikodemus
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Much, much better. :)
So why use this instead of regular fog? Is it much faster?
--
David Fontaine <dav### [at] faricynet> ICQ 55354965
My raytracing gallery: http://davidf.faricy.net/
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Like these two?
Well, I admit, the heightfield is from Terragen,
everything else Megapov 0.7. ;-)
-Hans-
Nikodemus Siivola wrote:
>
> "Abe" <bul### [at] taconicnet> wrote in message
> news:3AD25016.B35D9951@taconic.net...
>
> > First, thanks for the feedback! Interesting to note that what looks ok
> > on my LCD monitor is probably too light on a CRT.
>
> Doesn't look too bright here... and I must say that if I didn't know what
> software you were using, my first thougth would have been Terragen.
>
> -- Nikodemus
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> ----
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'pic02.jpg' (38 KB)
Download 'pic01.jpg' (49 KB)
Preview of image 'pic02.jpg'
Preview of image 'pic01.jpg'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Hans-Detlev Fink" <hdf### [at] pecosnospamde> wrote in message
news:3AD405C9.D9861108@pecos.n.o.s.p.a.m.de...
> Like these two?
Sorry... I have to say that the sans-media one looks the most terragenny to
me. :)
-- Nikodemus
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
