 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"AC" <amb### [at] telia com> wrote in message news:3a86b0a5$1@news.povray.org...
> How about peanuts, looks a lot like them.
Almond halves?
By the way, what are those other objects reflected in the lamp base?
Very nice picture! Have you tried rendering it with radiosity?
Regards,
Dave
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Sun, 11 Feb 2001 10:17:24 -0400, Alberto <jac### [at] usbve> wrote:
>It started as an exercise on how to make a book. At the end, this scene
>came out.
An excellent scene - and very appropriate. I am sure the book is real, where can
I get one?
Don't like the shiny floor though and the vase(?) is rather strange and detracts
from the scene.
----------------------
dav### [at] hamiltonitecom
http://hamiltonite.com/
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Finally something that raytraces with a bit of realism. Good work! I
wish ALL raytraced pictures were easy to give a real look. It *should*
actually be easy! Everything in reality, looks real. Even the most clean
white ball.
And now, computer speed has reached gigahertz measurements. It's time to
rewrite raytracers to use "real" formulas. Especially for lighting.
Well, maybe a provoking comment... Never mind... I like this picture but
I'm sure it's been a battle to adjust everything for the "real look".
Hugo
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
First I thought, they were stones of plums, but after a closer look I would
agree with peanuts. A bit too big though, or those "Jumbos".
Marc-Hendrik
AC schrieb in Nachricht <3a86b0a5$1@news.povray.org>...
>
>"Alan Kong" <ako### [at] povrayNO-SPAMorg> wrote in message
>
>> I agree. Alberto's paper book cover texture is perfect. I can't figure
>> out what those seed-like objects are in that glass tray, though.
>>
>How about peanuts, looks a lot like them.
>
>Ambis
>
>
>
>
>
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Nice!
I especially like the peanut-bowl-thing, and the reflections in the lamp.
The table texture is perfect! Wanna share it? ;-)
--
Peter
http://hertel.no/bigone
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Marc-Hendrik Bremer" <Mar### [at] t-onlinede> wrote in message
news:3a86d8c7$1@news.povray.org...
> First I thought, they were stones of plums, but after a closer look I
would
> agree with peanuts. A bit too big though, or those "Jumbos".
Yeah, after looking closer I agree also that they must be peanuts. Almonds
are darker brown with an off-white center.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
That looks good, i really like the finishes of all the objects. Of course
radiosity would be worth trying for the darker areas.
Christoph
--
Christoph Hormann <chr### [at] gmxde>
IsoWood include, radiosity tutorial, TransSkin and other
things on: http://www.schunter.etc.tu-bs.de/~chris/
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Marc-Hendrik Bremer wrote:
>
> The lighting is a bit strange. Is it possible, that the lamp shade has the
> "no_shadow" applied? ...
The light source of the lamp looks like a cone with double_illuminate
modifier. So you are right, there is a no_shadow in effect. But above
this cone I put another semi-transparent cone to make the lampshade cast
a shadow.
> I would expect, that the room is darker above the
> shadow of that ring. The cup and the candle holder are a bit to shiny and
> reflective, I think.
>
Mmhhh, may be. I'll see what can I do.
> But that all doesn't really matter. It's almost photorealistic! That book
> cover looks really good and the table is just ... realistic.
>
> Good work!
>
> Marc-Hendrik
Thank you!
Alberto.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Peter Hertel wrote:
>
> Nice!
> I especially like the peanut-bowl-thing, and the reflections in the lamp.
> The table texture is perfect! Wanna share it? ;-)
>
> --
> Peter
> http://hertel.no/bigone
Thanks for your comments. Bellow is the table texture but sometimes, a
texture which works fine in a scene doesn't in another.
texture{
finish{phong 1 reflection .075}
pigment{wood color_map{[0 rgb <1, .5, 0>][1 rgb .9*<1, .5, 0>]}
ramp_wave scale 5 rotate <0 90 0>
warp{turbulence .0625 octaves 6 omega 3 lambda .35}
translate 50/6*z
warp{repeat 50/3*z offset <75,20,0>}
translate -50/6*z
}
}
texture{
normal{wood .2
ramp_wave scale .5 rotate <0 90 0>
warp{turbulence .0625 octaves 6 omega 3 lambda .35}
translate 50/6*z
warp{repeat 50/3*z offset <75,20,0>}
translate -50/6*z
}
pigment{wood color_map{[0 rgbf .75*<1,.5,0,1>][1 rgbf 1*<1,.5,0,1>]}
scallop_wave scale .5 rotate <0 90 0>
warp{turbulence .0625 octaves 6 omega 3 lambda .35}
translate 50/6*z
warp{repeat 50/3*z offset <75,20,0>}
translate -50/6*z
}
}
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Dave Blandston wrote:
>
> "Marc-Hendrik Bremer" <Mar### [at] t-onlinede> wrote in message
> news:3a86d8c7$1@news.povray.org...
> > First I thought, they were stones of plums, but after a closer look I
> would
> > agree with peanuts. A bit too big though, or those "Jumbos".
>
> Yeah, after looking closer I agree also that they must be peanuts. Almonds
> are darker brown with an off-white center.
In mi mind their are peanuts. But I'll make them smaller.
Alberto
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
