 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Hi people,
Man, mpov's radiosity is awesome!!
High counts(600) and low error bounds(0.02), and one concrete image map.
benp
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'redball1.jpg' (25 KB)
Download 'redball2.jpg' (22 KB)
Preview of image 'redball1.jpg'
Preview of image 'redball2.jpg'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
please share render times, and original size of renders?
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
render times- around 4 1/2 hrs for each, i think. Sorry, i rarely keep
the stats once the pic's done...
at 390x249 (images are shown at original size)
Dearmad wrote:
> please share render times, and original size of renders?
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: David Fontaine
Subject: Re: red balls and concrete walls (2 pics, 25kb + 22kb)
Date: 10 Jan 2001 22:21:37
Message: <3A5D259E.A8662552@faricy.net>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Ben Paschke wrote:
> Hi people,
>
> Man, mpov's radiosity is awesome!!
>
> High counts(600) and low error bounds(0.02), and one concrete image map.
Wow, these are realistic! Though, I have to admit some of that comes from the
image_map, you cheater. ;)
--
David Fontaine <dav### [at] faricy net> ICQ 55354965
My raytracing gallery: http://davidf.faricy.net/
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: Tom Melly
Subject: Re: red balls and concrete walls (2 pics, 25kb + 22kb)
Date: 11 Jan 2001 04:32:49
Message: <3a5d7dc1@news.povray.org>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"David Fontaine" <dav### [at] faricynet> wrote in message
news:3A5D259E.A8662552@faricy.net...
> Wow, these are realistic! Though, I have to admit some of that comes from
the
> image_map, you cheater. ;)
>
My first thought - but is it a fair one (even with a smiley)? If the
criteria is to achieve a realistic image, then it succeeds. It's only
cheating if the criteria is something else or if the image map compromises
some other aspect of the image.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Tom Melly wrote:
>
> My first thought - but is it a fair one (even with a smiley)? If the
> criteria is to achieve a realistic image, then it succeeds. It's only
> cheating if the criteria is something else or if the image map compromises
> some other aspect of the image.
Sure, i know what you mean. Ideally i could have created the concrete texture
as a procedural, but it's just a test image and , i tell you, it takes a
helluva lot less time looking through a image library than creating a new
texture from scratch. It's funny how pov lets you get really stuck into
creating models, textures, processes etc that will work in as many situations
as possible, but when it comes down to it, more often than not your'e just
trying to create an image. The image map integrity starts to break down in
these pics would start to fall over if the camera was any closer, but it works
for what i've chosen to do with it. (really, i slapped it on with uv_mapping
and it looked great, so that was the end of it)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: David Fontaine
Subject: Re: red balls and concrete walls (2 pics, 25kb + 22kb)
Date: 11 Jan 2001 19:26:27
Message: <3A5E4E0E.12949FF0@faricy.net>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Tom Melly wrote:
> My first thought - but is it a fair one (even with a smiley)? If the
> criteria is to achieve a realistic image, then it succeeds. It's only
> cheating if the criteria is something else or if the image map compromises
> some other aspect of the image.
That can be argued either way, but I was being facetious.
--
David Fontaine <dav### [at] faricynet> ICQ 55354965
My raytracing gallery: http://davidf.faricy.net/
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: David Fontaine
Subject: Re: red balls and concrete walls (2 pics, 25kb + 22kb)
Date: 11 Jan 2001 19:31:49
Message: <3A5E4F51.245BFFF7@faricy.net>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Ben Paschke wrote:
> Sure, i know what you mean. Ideally i could have created the concrete texture
> as a procedural, but it's just a test image and , i tell you, it takes a
> helluva lot less time looking through a image library than creating a new
> texture from scratch. It's funny how pov lets you get really stuck into
> creating models, textures, processes etc that will work in as many situations
> as possible, but when it comes down to it, more often than not your'e just
> trying to create an image. The image map integrity starts to break down in
> these pics would start to fall over if the camera was any closer, but it works
> for what i've chosen to do with it. (really, i slapped it on with uv_mapping
> and it looked great, so that was the end of it)
No prob. I could have made the lettering on the boxcars text objects and
cubic_spline prisms. Let's get real. :)
--
David Fontaine <dav### [at] faricynet> ICQ 55354965
My raytracing gallery: http://davidf.faricy.net/
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
In article <3A5E4F51.245BFFF7@faricy.net>, David Fontaine
<dav### [at] faricynet> wrote:
> No prob. I could have made the lettering on the boxcars text objects and
> cubic_spline prisms. Let's get real. :)
You could also use text objects and prisms with the "object" pattern...
--
Christopher James Huff
Personal: chr### [at] maccom, http://homepage.mac.com/chrishuff/
TAG: chr### [at] tagpovrayorg, http://tag.povray.org/
<><
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
David Fontaine wrote:
> No prob. I could have made the lettering on the boxcars text objects and
> cubic_spline prisms. Let's get real. :)
>
> --
> David Fontaine <dav### [at] faricynet> ICQ 55354965
> My raytracing gallery: http://davidf.faricy.net/
Have you seen Fight Club on dvd. Image based rendering can produce spectacular
results. Usually looks much more realistic than that stuff they did in "The Phantom
Menace".
Dan Johnson
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Looks great. Best pov radiosity so far.
What is this thing about cheating? Are there some rules that specify
recommended procedures for creating images to be posted here? I
always thought that if even a part of the image was rendered with pov
it would be kewl to post it here. No matter how Photoshopped, image
mapped and composited.
_____________________________________________________________________
Kari Kivisalo http://www.kivisalo.net
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
thanks... adds a lot to the processing doesn't it, but beautiful
effects!
Ben Paschke wrote:
>
> render times- around 4 1/2 hrs for each, i think. Sorry, i rarely keep
> the stats once the pic's done...
> at 390x249 (images are shown at original size)
>
> Dearmad wrote:
>
> > please share render times, and original size of renders?
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: Christoph Hormann
Subject: Re: red balls and concrete walls (2 pics, 25kb + 22kb)
Date: 12 Jan 2001 03:00:10
Message: <3A5EB98A.F039872D@gmx.de>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Ben Paschke wrote:
>
> Hi people,
>
> Man, mpov's radiosity is awesome!!
>
> High counts(600) and low error bounds(0.02), and one concrete image map.
>
Looks nice, i did a radiosity render with similar settings (error bound =
0.01, count = 180) with a slightly more comlex scene recently, and had to
cancel it after rendering more than a day and only finishing about 1/4 of
the final pass and taking far more memory than i have (128 Mb)
Christoph
--
Christoph Hormann <chr### [at] gmxde>
IsoWood include, radiosity tutorial, TransSkin and other
things on: http://www.schunter.etc.tu-bs.de/~chris/
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: Tom Melly
Subject: Re: red balls and concrete walls (2 pics, 25kb + 22kb)
Date: 12 Jan 2001 04:21:34
Message: <3a5ecc9e@news.povray.org>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Kari Kivisalo" <kar### [at] kivisalonet> wrote in message
news:3A5E63CE.DEF08653@kivisalo.net...
>
> What is this thing about cheating? Are there some rules that specify
Don't worry - I don't think anyone's being serious... Well, not VERY
serious.....
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: Warp
Subject: Re: red balls and concrete walls (2 pics, 25kb + 22kb)
Date: 12 Jan 2001 05:47:54
Message: <3a5ee0da@news.povray.org>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
These are the kind of images that really makes those 3DS people who say
that povray is only a toy to shut up.
--
char*i="b[7FK@`3NB6>B:b3O6>:B:b3O6><`3:;8:6f733:>::b?7B>:>^B>C73;S1";
main(_,c,m){for(m=32;c=*i++-49;c&m?puts(""):m)for(_=(
c/4)&7;putchar(m),_--?m:(_=(1<<(c&3))-1,(m^=3)&3););} /*- Warp -*/
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: Tom Melly
Subject: Re: red balls and concrete walls (2 pics, 25kb + 22kb)
Date: 12 Jan 2001 06:01:28
Message: <3a5ee408$1@news.povray.org>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Warp" <war### [at] tagpovrayorg> wrote in message
news:3a5ee0da@news.povray.org...
> These are the kind of images that really makes those 3DS people who say
> that povray is only a toy to shut up.
>
Bad 3ds people saying that make Hulk angry. Hulk want to smash bad
saying-things people, but Betty say no, Hulk mustn't smash bad saying-things
people, Hulk must only smash bad doing-things people. Hulk like Betty, Betty
pretty and kind. Hulk do what Betty say.
Sorry, it's Friday, very sorry.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Tom Melly wrote:
>
> "Warp" <war### [at] tagpovrayorg> wrote in message
> news:3a5ee0da@news.povray.org...
> > These are the kind of images that really makes those 3DS people who say
> > that povray is only a toy to shut up.
> >
>
> Bad 3ds people saying that make Hulk angry. Hulk want to smash bad
> saying-things people, but Betty say no, Hulk mustn't smash bad saying-things
> people, Hulk must only smash bad doing-things people. Hulk like Betty, Betty
> pretty and kind. Hulk do what Betty say.
>
> Sorry, it's Friday, very sorry.
You better be. I now have to clean the coffee I sprayed of my monitor.
--
Francois Labreque | Unfortunately, there's no such thing as a snooze
flabreque | button on a cat who wants breakfast.
@ | - Unattributed quote from rec.humor.funny
videotron.ca
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
