 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Dug this out of my HD, still have the scene file too! I've posted it
here before, but I'm reposting anyway. :)
Plan to change aspect ratio to hide empty space, add windows (may just
put blinds in front of 'em to cheat), lighten carpet and render large
enough to get rid of nasty nasty moire.
Comments?
--
David Fontaine <dav### [at] faricy net> ICQ 55354965
My raytracing gallery: http://davidf.faricy.net/
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'li_spiraltree.jpg' (99 KB)
Preview of image 'li_spiraltree.jpg'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"David Fontaine" <dav### [at] faricynet> wrote in message
news:3A444185.86292C88@faricy.net...
> Dug this out of my HD, still have the scene file too! I've posted it
> here before, but I'm reposting anyway. :)
>
> Plan to change aspect ratio to hide empty space, add windows (may just
> put blinds in front of 'em to cheat), lighten carpet and render large
> enough to get rid of nasty nasty moire.
>
> Comments?
Yes - Moire patterns are NOT nasty.
I like them.
;)
Tor Olav
--
mailto:tor### [at] hotmailcom
http://www.crosswinds.net/~tok/tokrays.html
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"David Fontaine" <dav### [at] faricynet> wrote in message
news:3A444185.86292C88@faricy.net...
> Comments?
Beautiful! How about a spotlight on the golden star to make it sparkle? I've
also noticed an interesting phenomenon with metal textures and radiosity -
when you set the distance_maximum setting to something fairly low like .25
or so, you can get a really neat metallic effect, which would look great on
that star. Here's what I mean: Picture "A" is without radiosity, and picture
"B" is with radiosity.
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'A.jpg' (4 KB)
Download 'B.jpg' (5 KB)
Preview of image 'A.jpg'
Preview of image 'B.jpg'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Dave Blandston wrote:
> Beautiful!
Thanks!
> How about a spotlight on the golden star to make it sparkle? I've
> also noticed an interesting phenomenon with metal textures and radiosity -
> when you set the distance_maximum setting to something fairly low like .25
> or so, you can get a really neat metallic effect, which would look great on
> that star. Here's what I mean: Picture "A" is without radiosity, and picture
> "B" is with radiosity.
But, but, but... I only have a day and a half to work on it. :)
--
David Fontaine <dav### [at] faricynet> ICQ 55354965
My raytracing gallery: http://davidf.faricy.net/
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Some glows around the lights might look good too. it's too bad that you have
so little time to work on it, it seems like something you could spend a lot
of time on if you wanted.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"David Fontaine" <dav### [at] faricynet> wrote in message
news:3A454886.29A0AA8A@faricy.net...
> But, but, but... I only have a day and a half to work on it. :)
No problem - 1 hour to tweak the image, 35 hours to render it!
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
3A454886.29A0AA8A@faricy.net...
> But, but, but... I only have a day and a half to work on it. :)
Let say another year.... ;))
Merry christmas to all..
--
FD aka Freddy D. aka Prof D.
Pro### [at] wanadoofr
http://profd.est-ici.org
'... and see you next century !...'
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Dave Blandston wrote:
> No problem - 1 hour to tweak the image, 35 hours to render it!
Wow, the exact render time was 35:56:48!
--
David Fontaine <dav### [at] faricynet> ICQ 55354965
My raytracing gallery: http://davidf.faricy.net/
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
