![](/i/fill.gif) |
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
Matt Giwer wrote:
> I used to have a little one in a pot velcroed to the top of my car's
> dashboard. It lived for years on coffee dregs and an occassional bit of
> coke. And the looks it would get were worth every penny of the $2 it
> cost. If I could have managed a camera I would have a great collection
> of pedestrian double-takes at crosswalks.
Cool. Yeah, those cacti are tough.
--
David Fontaine <dav### [at] faricy net> ICQ 55354965
My raytracing gallery: http://davidf.faricy.net/
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
On Sun, 10 Dec 2000 14:47:59 +0100, Remco de Korte wrote:
>It appears this also called a yucca, so disregard my previous comment.
>
>BTW I've seen these in bloom (?).
I thought everything that grew in Holand had flowrs, so why were
you surprised?
--
Cheers
Steve email mailto:ste### [at] zeropps uklinux net
%HAV-A-NICEDAY Error not enough coffee 0 pps.
web http://www.zeropps.uklinux.net/
or http://start.at/zero-pps
8:26am up 61 days, 10:51, 3 users, load average: 1.24, 1.08, 1.02
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
Thes eplants will rot here before then can get flowers. That is, outdoors.
Indoors you'd need a high ceiling. The question mark was because I wasn't sure I
used the right frase/word/term (here I go again).
Remco
Steve wrote:
>
> On Sun, 10 Dec 2000 14:47:59 +0100, Remco de Korte wrote:
> >It appears this also called a yucca, so disregard my previous comment.
> >
> >BTW I've seen these in bloom (?).
>
> I thought everything that grew in Holand had flowrs, so why were
> you surprised?
>
> --
> Cheers
> Steve email mailto:ste### [at] zeropps uklinux net
>
> %HAV-A-NICEDAY Error not enough coffee 0 pps.
>
> web http://www.zeropps.uklinux.net/
>
> or http://start.at/zero-pps
>
> 8:26am up 61 days, 10:51, 3 users, load average: 1.24, 1.08, 1.02
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
in povray.binaries.images, Xplo Eristotle says...
> Just something I've been playing around with. This isn't meant to
> perfectly emulate any specific kind of plant, though it does rather
> resemble yucca. I'll probably make this into a real scene eventually.
>
I wonder why you post your JPG as a progressive type and not as a
straight type? First image I posted was progressive and nearly everybody
fell over me :-(
BTW it is nice and life-like, I wouldn't want to cut myself with it :)
--
Regards, Sander
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
Sander wrote:
>
> I wonder why you post your JPG as a progressive type and not as a
> straight type? First image I posted was progressive and nearly everybody
> fell over me :-(
Progressive is smaller, and no one ever gave me any trouble over it.. if
it's a problem, someone let me know, and I'll turn it off.
-Xplo
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
in povray.binaries.images, Xplo Eristotle says...
> Sander wrote:
>
> Progressive is smaller, and no one ever gave me any trouble over it.. if
> it's a problem, someone let me know, and I'll turn it off.
The standard viewer of my newsreader doesn't accept progressive jpg's; I
have to resort to another one. But if I'm the only one: don't bother...
I'll do that.
--
Regards, Sander
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
Sander wrote:
>
> in povray.binaries.images, Xplo Eristotle says...
> > Sander wrote:
> >
> > Progressive is smaller, and no one ever gave me any trouble over it.. if
> > it's a problem, someone let me know, and I'll turn it off.
>
> The standard viewer of my newsreader doesn't accept progressive jpg's; I
> have to resort to another one. But if I'm the only one: don't bother...
> I'll do that.
Ah, no need. It's only a small reduction in filesize anyway; I'll turn
it off.
-Xplo
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
in povray.binaries.images, Xplo Eristotle says...
>
> Ah, no need. It's only a small reduction in filesize anyway; I'll turn
> it off.
>
> -Xplo
>
Thanks. This viewer of my reader is not a great thing, so...
--
Regards, Sander
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |