 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Ok ... this time in context ...
but now I got it not the way I wanted it ...
OK ... I would say the algorithm is there ...
now it's time for tweaking the parameters ...
This time it took 17h in 1024x768 without Radiosity,but with AA.
I think because of my multiplane-heaven ...
but the lightnings look to odd ... :-(
--
,', Jan Walzer \V/ http://wa.lzer.net ,',
',',' student of >|< mailto:jan### [at] lzer net ',','
' ComputerScience /A\ +49-177-7403863 '
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'multiplane_heaven.jpg' (12 KB)
Preview of image 'multiplane_heaven.jpg'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Not that bad. The algorithm shows some promise.
If you want totally realistic lightning, you can do a prticle simulation
and have it follow the path of least resistance... ;)
--
David Fontaine <dav### [at] faricynet> ICQ 55354965
My raytracing gallery: http://davidf.faricy.net/
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Perhaps it would appear more 'natural' if the lightning diverged as you
traveled in a +Y direction, instead of the convergence it shows now?
--
Dawn McKnight | "Who cares what the hipbone's connected to? I'm in Neurology!"
McK### [at] maccom | -- Justine Devlin, M.D.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
There certainly seems to be a lot of it in one frame, and I think the
lightning is fine, but the sky should be more obviously full of clouds
and darker, justifying so much activity.
Either that or a road with the time elapsed effects of cars driving
across the ground, like in those pictures where the shutter on the
camera stays open for a long time.
Josh
Jan Walzer wrote:
> Ok ... this time in context ...
>
> but now I got it not the way I wanted it ...
> OK ... I would say the algorithm is there ...
> now it's time for tweaking the parameters ...
> This time it took 17h in 1024x768 without Radiosity,but with AA.
> I think because of my multiplane-heaven ...
>
> but the lightnings look to odd ... :-(
>
> --
>
> ,', Jan Walzer \V/ http://wa.lzer.net ,',
> ',',' student of >|< mailto:jan### [at] lzernet ',','
> ' ComputerScience /A\ +49-177-7403863 '
>
> [Image]
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Okay... I posted my current source in p.b.s
--
,', Jan Walzer \V/ http://wa.lzer.net ,',
',',' student of >|< mailto:jan### [at] lzernet ',','
' ComputerScience /A\ +49-177-7403863 '
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
I think it would make the perfect lightning for either a scene of an
alien world or maybe as a surrealistic effect.
Jan Walzer wrote:
> Ok ... this time in context ...
>
> but now I got it not the way I wanted it ...
> OK ... I would say the algorithm is there ...
> now it's time for tweaking the parameters ...
> This time it took 17h in 1024x768 without Radiosity,but with AA.
> I think because of my multiplane-heaven ...
>
> but the lightnings look to odd ... :-(
>
> --
>
> ,', Jan Walzer \V/ http://wa.lzer.net ,',
> ',',' student of >|< mailto:jan### [at] lzernet ',','
> ' ComputerScience /A\ +49-177-7403863 '
>
> [Image]
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
