POV-Ray : Newsgroups : povray.binaries.images : Motion Blur experiment Server Time
20 Aug 2024 02:19:52 EDT (-0400)
  Motion Blur experiment (Message 21 to 23 of 23)  
<<< Previous 10 Messages Goto Initial 10 Messages
From: Alan Kong
Subject: Re: Motion Blur experiment
Date: 18 Oct 2000 10:23:01
Message: <9dcrusgd55ujrs92uco5an5c5b5oabnhq6@4ax.com>
On Wed, 18 Oct 2000 13:10:13 +0300 Kari Kivisalo wrote:

(posted area_point.jpg, 51.6KBytes)

  Hey, nice example! Thanks, Kari.

-- 
Alan - ako### [at] povrayorg - a k o n g <at> p o v r a y <dot> o r g
http://www.povray.org - Home of the Persistence of Vision Ray Tracer


Post a reply to this message

From: David Fontaine
Subject: Re: Motion Blur experiment
Date: 18 Oct 2000 18:46:50
Message: <39EE25B9.3A59084A@faricy.net>
Why is the area_light so much longer to render??

--
David Fontaine  <dav### [at] faricynet>  ICQ 55354965
My raytracing gallery:  http://davidf.faricy.net/


Post a reply to this message

From: Kari Kivisalo
Subject: Re: Motion Blur experiment
Date: 19 Oct 2000 05:01:34
Message: <39EEB865.C05D919E@kivisalo.net>
David Fontaine wrote:
> 
> Why is the area_light so much longer to render??

I tested it again in POV 3.1g:

area_light 1x32              3 min 55 sec
area_light 1x32 adaptive 2   1 min 13 sec (clear errors visible)
32 point lights              24 sec

pov2.0 source in binaries.source


______________________________________________________________________
Kari Kivisalo                                  http://www.kivisalo.net


Post a reply to this message

<<< Previous 10 Messages Goto Initial 10 Messages

Copyright 2003-2023 Persistence of Vision Raytracer Pty. Ltd.