POV-Ray : Newsgroups : povray.binaries.images : Re: The Fortress of Torganswall Server Time
20 Aug 2024 04:17:49 EDT (-0400)
  Re: The Fortress of Torganswall (Message 11 to 13 of 13)  
<<< Previous 10 Messages Goto Initial 10 Messages
From: Steve
Subject: Re: The Fortress of Torganswall
Date: 26 Sep 2000 12:08:31
Message: <slrn8t1gq1.ita.steve@zero-pps.localdomain>
On Tue, 26 Sep 2000 13:55:40 +0200, Marc-Hendrik Bremer wrote:
>
>Ian Witham schrieb in Nachricht <39d00cd6@news.povray.org>...
>>"Marc-Hendrik Bremer" <Mar### [at] t-onlinede> wrote in message
>>news:39cfcae0@news.povray.org...
>>>
>>> Steve schrieb in Nachricht ...
>>> >You're right it doesn't look imposing, it looks kind of cute.
>>> >
>>>
>>> Is this a contradiction? Cute and imposing? Perhaps. Something to fear is
>>> probably more imposing, isn't it?
>>
>>I think you misunderstand the sentence:
>>
>>Imposing = No
>>Cute = Yes
>>
>
>No I understood it that way. But I wonder if it is possible to look imposing
>AND cute at the same time. I hope 'imposing' has no connotation which I
>totally miss, because most of the suggestions for this pic seems to say:
>"make it darker, and add thinks to scare people of". I agree this will
>probably help making it imposing, but I thought of a more "friendly" way. As
>Tom Melly said in his reply: That might well be the problem. :-)

Maybe what you're looking for is big or awesome rather than imposing, 

-- 
Cheers
Steve              email mailto:ste### [at] zeroppsuklinuxnet

%HAV-A-NICEDAY Error not enough coffee  0 pps. 

web http://www.zeropps.uklinux.net/

or  http://start.at/zero-pps

  2:36pm  up 35 days, 18:50,  2 users,  load average: 2.11, 2.09, 2.05


Post a reply to this message

From: Marc-Hendrik Bremer
Subject: Re: The Fortress of Torganswall
Date: 26 Sep 2000 13:04:55
Message: <39d0d737$1@news.povray.org>
Steve schrieb in Nachricht ...
>On Mon, 25 Sep 2000 23:57:11 +0200, Marc-Hendrik Bremer wrote:
>>
>>Steve schrieb in Nachricht ...
>>>You're right it doesn't look imposing, it looks kind of cute.
>>>
>>
>>Is this a contradiction? Cute and imposing? Perhaps. Something to fear is
>>probably more imposing, isn't it?
>
>"Doesn't" is an abbreviation of "does not",
>

Oh, there went something definetly wrong :-). Reading my response again I
see, what this misunderstandig could be about. I'll try again:

You are absolutly right, it doesn't look imposing. But I wonder if it is
possible to make it look cute AND imposing - or is this a contradiction in
itself? Well, perhaps "imposing" is indeed the wrong word (it's what my
dictionary told me is the expression for the German "eindrucksvoll,
imponierend"), is "impressive" better? Or yes - "awesome" might be the word
as you suggested :-)

Sorry, if i pulled the wrong trigger with my lousy attemps to use the
English language. I'm familiar with most of the everydays abbreviations and
I thing I got you right. You native english speaker have probably a hard
time with (some) of us non-natives sometimes. :-)

Marc-Hendrik


Post a reply to this message

From: Steve
Subject: Re: The Fortress of Torganswall
Date: 26 Sep 2000 17:52:10
Message: <slrn8t1st8.jee.steve@zero-pps.localdomain>
On Tue, 26 Sep 2000 19:04:53 +0200, Marc-Hendrik Bremer wrote:
>
>Sorry, if i pulled the wrong trigger with my lousy attemps to use the
>English language. I'm familiar with most of the everydays abbreviations and
>I thing I got you right. You native english speaker have probably a hard
>time with (some) of us non-natives sometimes. :-)

You people (who use this server), all speak such good English that it's easy
to forget and use abbreviations and colloquialisms all over the place. 

-- 
Cheers
Steve              email mailto:ste### [at] zeroppsuklinuxnet

%HAV-A-NICEDAY Error not enough coffee  0 pps. 

web http://www.zeropps.uklinux.net/

or  http://start.at/zero-pps

  7:45pm  up 36 days, 0 min,  2 users,  load average: 2.49, 2.51, 2.27


Post a reply to this message

<<< Previous 10 Messages Goto Initial 10 Messages

Copyright 2003-2023 Persistence of Vision Raytracer Pty. Ltd.