 |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
On Tue, 26 Sep 2000 13:55:40 +0200, Marc-Hendrik Bremer wrote:
>
>Ian Witham schrieb in Nachricht <39d00cd6@news.povray.org>...
>>"Marc-Hendrik Bremer" <Mar### [at] t-online de> wrote in message
>>news:39cfcae0@news.povray.org...
>>>
>>> Steve schrieb in Nachricht ...
>>> >You're right it doesn't look imposing, it looks kind of cute.
>>> >
>>>
>>> Is this a contradiction? Cute and imposing? Perhaps. Something to fear is
>>> probably more imposing, isn't it?
>>
>>I think you misunderstand the sentence:
>>
>>Imposing = No
>>Cute = Yes
>>
>
>No I understood it that way. But I wonder if it is possible to look imposing
>AND cute at the same time. I hope 'imposing' has no connotation which I
>totally miss, because most of the suggestions for this pic seems to say:
>"make it darker, and add thinks to scare people of". I agree this will
>probably help making it imposing, but I thought of a more "friendly" way. As
>Tom Melly said in his reply: That might well be the problem. :-)
Maybe what you're looking for is big or awesome rather than imposing,
--
Cheers
Steve email mailto:ste### [at] zeropps uklinux net
%HAV-A-NICEDAY Error not enough coffee 0 pps.
web http://www.zeropps.uklinux.net/
or http://start.at/zero-pps
2:36pm up 35 days, 18:50, 2 users, load average: 2.11, 2.09, 2.05
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
Steve schrieb in Nachricht ...
>On Mon, 25 Sep 2000 23:57:11 +0200, Marc-Hendrik Bremer wrote:
>>
>>Steve schrieb in Nachricht ...
>>>You're right it doesn't look imposing, it looks kind of cute.
>>>
>>
>>Is this a contradiction? Cute and imposing? Perhaps. Something to fear is
>>probably more imposing, isn't it?
>
>"Doesn't" is an abbreviation of "does not",
>
Oh, there went something definetly wrong :-). Reading my response again I
see, what this misunderstandig could be about. I'll try again:
You are absolutly right, it doesn't look imposing. But I wonder if it is
possible to make it look cute AND imposing - or is this a contradiction in
itself? Well, perhaps "imposing" is indeed the wrong word (it's what my
dictionary told me is the expression for the German "eindrucksvoll,
imponierend"), is "impressive" better? Or yes - "awesome" might be the word
as you suggested :-)
Sorry, if i pulled the wrong trigger with my lousy attemps to use the
English language. I'm familiar with most of the everydays abbreviations and
I thing I got you right. You native english speaker have probably a hard
time with (some) of us non-natives sometimes. :-)
Marc-Hendrik
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
On Tue, 26 Sep 2000 19:04:53 +0200, Marc-Hendrik Bremer wrote:
>
>Sorry, if i pulled the wrong trigger with my lousy attemps to use the
>English language. I'm familiar with most of the everydays abbreviations and
>I thing I got you right. You native english speaker have probably a hard
>time with (some) of us non-natives sometimes. :-)
You people (who use this server), all speak such good English that it's easy
to forget and use abbreviations and colloquialisms all over the place.
--
Cheers
Steve email mailto:ste### [at] zeropps uklinux net
%HAV-A-NICEDAY Error not enough coffee 0 pps.
web http://www.zeropps.uklinux.net/
or http://start.at/zero-pps
7:45pm up 36 days, 0 min, 2 users, load average: 2.49, 2.51, 2.27
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|
 |