 |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
From: Bob Hughes
Subject: Will the real Arnold please stand up? [total ~136K Jpg]
Date: 18 Sep 2000 07:23:04
Message: <39c5fb18@news.povray.org>
|
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
From the cartoon of the same name, Arnold (the football-shaped head kid, a
girl calls him) as I tried to make him yesterday. I only see the cartoon
occasionally as the channels are changed so he's not going to be perfected
in any way.
With the talk and posting here about Arnold, the radiosity rendering engine,
I had figured I'd try this character out someday to check radiosity in
POV-Ray. It turns out to be a fair choice of a CSG object to do that imo,
colors and all (I say this tongue-in-cheek).
3 images attached; a non-radiosity, radiosity, and non-radiosity with
post_process find_edges applied. The file names are obvious so if they are
out of order... well, anyone can tell the difference probably.
global_settings{
assumed_gamma 2.3
ambient_light 1//.25 // .25 when radiosity used
ini_option "-qr" // + for on
radiosity{
brightness 1.23
count 123
recursion_limit 1
gray_threshold .1
error_bound .123
low_error_factor .246
minimum_reuse .0123
pretrace_start .08
pretrace_end .001
}
post_process {
posterize { rgb 20 } // separates colors
find_edges{ 1.25, .25, .15, 2, .25, rgb 0 }
}
}
The (point) light source was changed from bright white to orange when going
from no radiosity to radiosity so there could be better coloring since the
sky was contributing so much blue. In other words, I haven't attached the
one without a light because it was with that blue sky and also haven't tried
a hemisphere of light sources yet.
Bob
--
omniVerse http://users.aol.com/persistenceofv/all.htm
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'arnoldnorad.jpg' (33 KB)
Download 'arnoldrad.jpg' (31 KB)
Download 'arnoldtoon.jpg' (36 KB)
Preview of image 'arnoldnorad.jpg'

Preview of image 'arnoldrad.jpg'

Preview of image 'arnoldtoon.jpg'

|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
3D toony to 2D toony.
The last one would be better if you got rid of a bit more of the color
striations, or blended them more smoothly.
Bob Hughes wrote:
> From the cartoon of the same name, Arnold (the football-shaped head kid, a
> girl calls him) as I tried to make him yesterday. I only see the cartoon
> occasionally as the channels are changed so he's not going to be perfected
> in any way.
> With the talk and posting here about Arnold, the radiosity rendering engine,
> I had figured I'd try this character out someday to check radiosity in
> POV-Ray. It turns out to be a fair choice of a CSG object to do that imo,
> colors and all (I say this tongue-in-cheek).
> 3 images attached; a non-radiosity, radiosity, and non-radiosity with
> post_process find_edges applied. The file names are obvious so if they are
> out of order... well, anyone can tell the difference probably.
>
> global_settings{
> assumed_gamma 2.3
> ambient_light 1//.25 // .25 when radiosity used
> ini_option "-qr" // + for on
> radiosity{
> brightness 1.23
> count 123
> recursion_limit 1
> gray_threshold .1
> error_bound .123
> low_error_factor .246
> minimum_reuse .0123
> pretrace_start .08
> pretrace_end .001
> }
> post_process {
> posterize { rgb 20 } // separates colors
> find_edges{ 1.25, .25, .15, 2, .25, rgb 0 }
> }
> }
>
> The (point) light source was changed from bright white to orange when going
> from no radiosity to radiosity so there could be better coloring since the
> sky was contributing so much blue. In other words, I haven't attached the
> one without a light because it was with that blue sky and also haven't tried
> a hemisphere of light sources yet.
>
> Bob
> --
> omniVerse http://users.aol.com/persistenceofv/all.htm
>
> [Image]
>
> [Image]
>
> [Image]
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
From: Bob Hughes
Subject: Re: Will the real Arnold please stand up? [total ~136K Jpg]
Date: 18 Sep 2000 08:01:47
Message: <39c6042b$1@news.povray.org>
|
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
"Greg M. Johnson" <gre### [at] my-dejanews com> wrote in message
news:39C5FF52.FD480D32@my-dejanews.com...
| 3D toony to 2D toony.
| The last one would be better if you got rid of a bit more of the color
| striations, or blended them more smoothly.
Yep, I wasn't going to make one like that at all. Then figured what the
heck, it goes with the cartoon subject.
My attempt to do a flat 2D look failed because I didn't use the right number
I guess. Probably supposed to be posterize {rgb 1} and I used rgb 25
instead.
Bob
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
From: David Fontaine
Subject: Re: Will the real Arnold please stand up? [total ~136K Jpg]
Date: 18 Sep 2000 17:22:25
Message: <39C6864D.282621FB@faricy.net>
|
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
That white boy cRap isn't any better than the gangsta cRap.
--
David Fontaine <dav### [at] faricy net> ICQ 55354965
My raytracing gallery: http://davidf.faricy.net/
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
On Mon, 18 Sep 2000 16:17:01 -0500, David Fontaine wrote:
>That white boy cRap isn't any better than the gangsta cRap.
Y'know, the phrase "will the real ______ please stand up" was around
before whats-his-name, and will be around long after he's dead and buried.
--
Ron Parker http://www2.fwi.com/~parkerr/traces.html
My opinions. Mine. Not anyone else's.
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
From: Zeger Knaepen
Subject: Re: Will the real Arnold please stand up? [total ~136K Jpg]
Date: 18 Sep 2000 20:29:05
Message: <39c6b351$1@news.povray.org>
|
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
> whats-his-name>
Slim Shitty?
ZK
http://www.povplace.be.tf
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
On Tue, 19 Sep 2000 02:40:44 +0200, Zeger Knaepen wrote:
>> whats-his-name>
>Slim Shitty?
M&M/Mars should sue his ass off.
--
Ron Parker http://www2.fwi.com/~parkerr/traces.html
My opinions. Mine. Not anyone else's.
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
From: David Fontaine
Subject: Re: Will the real Arnold please stand up? [total ~136K Jpg]
Date: 18 Sep 2000 23:25:13
Message: <39C6DB57.C1FD95FE@faricy.net>
|
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
Ron Parker wrote:
> On Mon, 18 Sep 2000 16:17:01 -0500, David Fontaine wrote:
> >That white boy cRap isn't any better than the gangsta cRap.
>
> Y'know, the phrase "will the real ______ please stand up" was around
> before whats-his-name, and will be around long after he's dead and buried.
Sure, but it's still permanently marred by a connection to Eminem.
--
David Fontaine <dav### [at] faricy net> ICQ 55354965
My raytracing gallery: http://davidf.faricy.net/
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
From: David Fontaine
Subject: Re: Will the real Arnold please stand up? [total ~136K Jpg]
Date: 18 Sep 2000 23:25:29
Message: <39C6DB69.1A4E1F07@faricy.net>
|
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
Ron Parker wrote:
> M&M/Mars should sue his ass off.
I second that.
--
David Fontaine <dav### [at] faricy net> ICQ 55354965
My raytracing gallery: http://davidf.faricy.net/
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
David Fontaine <dav### [at] faricy net> writes:
> That white boy cRap isn't any better than the gangsta cRap.
Well, if you don't like rap.. I like Slim and I hate the people suing him.
--
ICQ 74734588
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
From: Zeger Knaepen
Subject: Re: Will the real Arnold please stand up? [total ~136K Jpg]
Date: 19 Sep 2000 08:55:37
Message: <39c76249$1@news.povray.org>
|
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
Why exactly?
Is it something he "sings"? (I've never heared a complete "song" of Slim
Shitty, I don't even want to)
ZK
http://www.povplace.be.tf
David Fontaine <dav### [at] faricy net> schreef in berichtnieuws
39C6DB69.1A4E1F07@faricy.net...
> Ron Parker wrote:
>
> > M&M/Mars should sue his ass off.
>
> I second that.
>
> --
> David Fontaine <dav### [at] faricy net> ICQ 55354965
> My raytracing gallery: http://davidf.faricy.net/
>
>
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
On Tue, 19 Sep 2000 15:07:23 +0200, Zeger Knaepen wrote:
>Why exactly?
>Is it something he "sings"? (I've never heared a complete "song" of Slim
>Shitty, I don't even want to)
Nope. I have nothing against his "art." It's his appropriating a trademark
that I have a problem with.
--
Ron Parker http://www2.fwi.com/~parkerr/traces.html
My opinions. Mine. Not anyone else's.
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
From: Ian Witham
Subject: Re: Will the real Arnold please stand up? [total ~136K Jpg]
Date: 19 Sep 2000 10:39:53
Message: <39c77ab9@news.povray.org>
|
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
"Ron Parker" <ron### [at] povray org> wrote in message
news:slr### [at] fwi com...
> On Tue, 19 Sep 2000 15:07:23 +0200, Zeger Knaepen wrote:
> >Why exactly?
> >Is it something he "sings"? (I've never heared a complete "song" of Slim
> >Shitty, I don't even want to)
>
> Nope. I have nothing against his "art." It's his appropriating a
trademark
> that I have a problem with.
Yeah let him sing about killing women and gays, and raping underage girls
out of their heads on hallucenagens... that's all fine and good as long as
he leaves that lovable coloured candy alone.
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
From: David Fontaine
Subject: Re: Will the real Arnold please stand up? [total ~136K Jpg]
Date: 19 Sep 2000 16:49:41
Message: <39C7D021.53D45142@faricy.net>
|
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
"Sigmund Kyrre Ås" wrote:
> Well, if you don't like rap.. I like Slim and I hate the people suing him.
Who's suing him?
--
David Fontaine <dav### [at] faricy net> ICQ 55354965
My raytracing gallery: http://davidf.faricy.net/
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
From: Ian Witham
Subject: Re: Will the real Arnold please stand up? [total ~136K Jpg]
Date: 20 Sep 2000 00:58:29
Message: <39c843f5@news.povray.org>
|
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
"David Fontaine" <dav### [at] faricy net> wrote in message
news:39C7D021.53D45142@faricy.net...
> "Sigmund Kyrre Ås" wrote:
>
> > Well, if you don't like rap.. I like Slim and I hate the people suing
him.
>
> Who's suing him?
His own mother for one (true story)
He says some very unkind things about her in his songs.
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
Ian Witham wrote:
>
> "David Fontaine" <dav### [at] faricy net> wrote in message
> news:39C7D021.53D45142@faricy.net...
> > "Sigmund Kyrre Ås" wrote:
> >
> > > Well, if you don't like rap.. I like Slim and I hate the people suing
> him.
> >
> > Who's suing him?
>
> His own mother for one (true story)
> He says some very unkind things about her in his songs.
And his ex-wife, for the same reason.
--
Francois Labreque | The surest sign of the existence of extra-
flabreq | terrestrial intelligence is that they never
@ | bothered to come down here and visit us!
attglobal.net - Calvin
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
From: David Fontaine
Subject: Re: Will the real Arnold please stand up? [total ~136K Jpg]
Date: 20 Sep 2000 23:46:13
Message: <39C98340.EC872E9E@faricy.net>
|
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
Francois Labreque wrote:
> Ian Witham wrote:
> >
> > "David Fontaine" <dav### [at] faricy net> wrote in message
> > news:39C7D021.53D45142@faricy.net...
> > > "Sigmund Kyrre Ås" wrote:
> > >
> > > > Well, if you don't like rap.. I like Slim and I hate the people suing
> > him.
> > >
> > > Who's suing him?
> >
> > His own mother for one (true story)
> > He says some very unkind things about her in his songs.
>
> And his ex-wife, for the same reason.
You mean someone actually married him?
--
David Fontaine <dav### [at] faricy net> ICQ 55354965
My raytracing gallery: http://davidf.faricy.net/
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
David Fontaine wrote:
>
> Francois Labreque wrote:
>
> > Ian Witham wrote:
> > >
> > > "David Fontaine" <dav### [at] faricy net> wrote in message
> > > news:39C7D021.53D45142@faricy.net...
> > > > "Sigmund Kyrre Ås" wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Well, if you don't like rap.. I like Slim and I hate the people suing
> > > him.
> > > >
> > > > Who's suing him?
> > >
> > > His own mother for one (true story)
> > > He says some very unkind things about her in his songs.
> >
> > And his ex-wife, for the same reason.
>
> You mean someone actually married him?
Women can be notoriously stupid that way. Kinda funny considering how
picky most of them are.
-Xplo
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
From: Bob Hughes
Subject: Re: Will the real Arnold please stand up? [total ~136K Jpg]
Date: 21 Sep 2000 16:23:12
Message: <39ca6e30$1@news.povray.org>
|
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
"Xplo Eristotle" <inq### [at] unforgettable com> wrote in message
news:39C9A1ED.3CCE773C@unforgettable.com...
| > You mean someone actually married him?
|
| Women can be notoriously stupid that way. Kinda funny considering how
| picky most of them are.
You just summed up the extent to which my understanding and philosophy on
that subject should go.
Bob
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
David Fontaine wrote:
>
> Francois Labreque wrote:
>
> > Ian Witham wrote:
> > >
> > > "David Fontaine" <dav### [at] faricy net> wrote in message
> > > news:39C7D021.53D45142@faricy.net...
> > > > "Sigmund Kyrre Ås" wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Well, if you don't like rap.. I like Slim and I hate the people suing
> > > him.
> > > >
> > > > Who's suing him?
> > >
> > > His own mother for one (true story)
> > > He says some very unkind things about her in his songs.
> >
> > And his ex-wife, for the same reason.
>
> You mean someone actually married him?
Yes. She and their daughter* appear in his latest video (the one where
he's falling from a building).
*Probably actors
--
Francois Labreque | The surest sign of the existence of extra-
flabreq | terrestrial intelligence is that they never
@ | bothered to come down here and visit us!
attglobal.net - Calvin
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |