|
 |
"Halbert" <hha### [at] capital net> wrote in message
news:39bad784@news.povray.org...
| I think that the lighting still leaves much to be desired.
Give an artist the tools he needs...
It's really great, but I'm being overly flattering because this is so new a
thing still. Instead of glows I'm sure media could be used too, although
perhaps that's much slower.
You have a bit too much turbulence in that isosurface making parts detach so
it's loses some credibility.
How did you go about aligning the stars? Is there a image map behind there
or one used as a template?
Bob
Post a reply to this message
|
|
|
|
"Bob Hughes" wrote ...
> Give an artist the tools he needs...
> It's really great, but I'm being overly flattering because this is so new
a
> thing still. Instead of glows I'm sure media could be used too, although
> perhaps that's much slower.
> You have a bit too much turbulence in that isosurface making parts detach
so
> it's loses some credibility.
> How did you go about aligning the stars? Is there a image map behind
there
> or one used as a template?
>
> Bob
I agree, I still need more practice with the iso's. ("ridgedMF" by the way)
The stars were actually placed by eye, when I started fooling with the glows
and added a touch of turbulence it reminded me of the photos I have seen of
this star cluster so I looked at a picture and started adding the other
stars. Just one of the more obvious uses of the new glows.
--
http://www.capital.net/~hhawkins
Post a reply to this message
|
|
