 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
I got a mini-laserpointer for my birthday last year (it's only 2 inches
long). I was curious how well I could model it in povray.
What do you think?
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'laserpointer.jpg' (202 KB)
Preview of image 'laserpointer.jpg'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
was such a huge image necessary?
NoOne wrote:
>
> I got a mini-laserpointer for my birthday last year (it's only 2 inches
> long). I was curious how well I could model it in povray.
> What do you think?
>
> [Image]
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Very nice (the laser anyway)! I can see why you chose not to compress this.
Don't expect many visitors, though ;)
Grim
"NoOne" <---@---> wrote in message news:39b1ca25@news.povray.org...
> I got a mini-laserpointer for my birthday last year (it's only 2 inches
> long). I was curious how well I could model it in povray.
> What do you think?
>
>
>
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Sat, 2 Sep 2000 23:43:23 -0400, NoOne wrote:
>I got a mini-laserpointer for my birthday last year (it's only 2 inches
>long). I was curious how well I could model it in povray.
>What do you think?
>
You could have used a bit more compression on the jpg.
If it's only 2 inches long those bricks must be tiny. Nice modelling
on the actual object but the brick reflection on it seems a bit
wrong, don't know why.
--
Cheers
Steve email mailto:ste### [at] zeropps uklinuxnet
%HAV-A-NICEDAY Error not enough coffee 0 pps.
web http://www.zeropps.uklinux.net/
or http://start.at/zero-pps
11:13pm up 13 days, 3:31, 2 users, load average: 2.08, 1.94, 1.92
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Steve" <ste### [at] zeroppsuklinuxnet> wrote in message
news:slr### [at] zero-ppslocaldomain...
| On Sat, 2 Sep 2000 23:43:23 -0400, NoOne wrote:
| >I got a mini-laserpointer for my birthday last year (it's only 2 inches
| >long). I was curious how well I could model it in povray.
| >What do you think?
Now try something even more CSG-involved :-)
| You could have used a bit more compression on the jpg.
I'll agree this could have been half the file size. Optimization here is
the general rule.
| If it's only 2 inches long those bricks must be tiny. Nice modelling
| on the actual object but the brick reflection on it seems a bit
| wrong, don't know why.
Yep, scale is off or those bricks aren't right behind it (focal blur
opportunity!). Might have needed more AA depth; +r4 or Antialias_Depth=4 or
more to prevent the jaggies from showing up in that reflection. It's plenty
smooth for sure on everything besides, so perhaps it's another problem. Max
trace level too low maybe, just guessing, don't know if that would matter.
Bob
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Steve wrote:
>
> On Sat, 2 Sep 2000 23:43:23 -0400, NoOne wrote:
> >I got a mini-laserpointer for my birthday last year (it's only 2 inches
> >long). I was curious how well I could model it in povray.
> >What do you think?
> >
>
> You could have used a bit more compression on the jpg.
>
> If it's only 2 inches long those bricks must be tiny. Nice modelling
> on the actual object but the brick reflection on it seems a bit
> wrong, don't know why.
>
I guess it's because it's reflecting an infinite brick wall and there's
nothing behind the camera. When using reflective objects you should make
sure you have something to reflect everywhere, even if it's not seen
directly...
--
* Doctor Jekyll had something * mailto:ber### [at] inamecom
* to Hyde... * http://www.enst.fr/~jberger
*******************************
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
