 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Bad news 200 clouds a couple of hours to render - not sure why
Mick
"Mick Hazelgrove" <mic### [at] mhazelgrove fsnetcouk> wrote in message
news:39a501b8@news.povray.org...
> Hi All
>
> I've been messing with Kevin's clouds. With his permission I'll post the
> annotated code that produced these clouds. The technique definately has
> possibilities. Judge for yourself . These are OT in many ways you can
> produce clouds that range from soft fluffy things to the most tortured
> clouds imaginable.
>
> Mick
>
>
>
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
In article <39a502ef@news.povray.org>, "Tom Melly" <tom### [at] tomandlucouk>
wrote:
>Wow. I'm trying to do some clouds myself at the moment, and these just blow
>me away. Mine all end up looking like frosted dog-turds. Please post the
>code asap!
Could you post some code? I've been looking for frosted dog-turds.
:*)
Jerry
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
In article <39a501b8@news.povray.org>, "Mick Hazelgrove"
<mic### [at] mhazelgrovefsnetcouk> wrote:
> Hi All
>
> I've been messing with Kevin's clouds. With his permission I'll post the
> annotated code that produced these clouds. The technique definately has
> possibilities. Judge for yourself . These are OT in many ways you can
> produce clouds that range from soft fluffy things to the most tortured
> clouds imaginable.
These seem to have a very good "painted" look...and I don't mean done in
a paint program, I mean a real painting. Maybe watercolors...
Not necessarily a bad effect, just surprising. If you can just get the
rest of a complex scene to look that way...
--
Christopher James Huff
Personal: chr### [at] maccom, http://homepage.mac.com/chrishuff/
TAG: chr### [at] tagpovrayorg, http://tag.povray.org/
<><
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Mick Hazelgrove wrote:
>
> Bad news 200 clouds a couple of hours to render - not sure why
>
Well, if you put your clouds in blobs, that might be why...
--
* Doctor Jekyll had something * mailto:ber### [at] inamecom
* to Hyde... * http://www.enst.fr/~jberger
*******************************
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Mick: Put the blos in individual union{}s and bound them manually. This
will decrease you render time by about 2/3rds. I think. This is the only
way I'm able to medel in blobs without loosing my sanity.
H.E. Day
<><
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
| These seem to have a very good "painted" look...and I don't mean done in
| a paint program, I mean a real painting. Maybe watercolors...
| Not necessarily a bad effect, just surprising. If you can just get the
| rest of a complex scene to look that way...
You mean like this?
H.E. Day
<><
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'Scene1.JPG' (23 KB)
Preview of image 'Scene1.JPG'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"H. E. Day" <Pov### [at] aolcom> wrote :
>
> You mean like this?
Man! I can't wait!
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
This looks absolutely stunning!
--
Ian
Inkwell: Ian's Homepage
http://www.topcities.com/cartoon/inkwell/index.htm
"H. E. Day" <Pov### [at] aolcom> wrote in message
news:01c00de8$d1a689a0$817889d0@daysix...
> | These seem to have a very good "painted" look...and I don't mean done in
> | a paint program, I mean a real painting. Maybe watercolors...
> | Not necessarily a bad effect, just surprising. If you can just get the
> | rest of a complex scene to look that way...
>
> You mean like this?
>
> H.E. Day
> <><
>
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
In article <01c00de8$d1a689a0$817889d0@daysix>, "H. E. Day"
<Pov### [at] aolcom> wrote:
> You mean like this?
:-)
Well, that is more "cartoony" than what I was thinking of, but yes, that
would do.
--
Christopher James Huff
Personal: chr### [at] maccom, http://homepage.mac.com/chrishuff/
TAG: chr### [at] tagpovrayorg, http://tag.povray.org/
<><
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
for the base of the cloud, what I had in mind, but didn't get around to doing,
was to use a function like exp(-y^2) or max(0, 1-y) or some such thing to have
the clouds fade out (not a slow fade though, just not a sudden chop) at the
bottom.
kevin ellis wrote:
> I too have been messing with Kevin W's clouds. Here is what I came up with,
> the base of the cloud still needs refinement though.
>
> Kevin E.
>
> [Image]
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
