|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Here comes the second version, now with reflective texture and some other
changes.
Because the textuing of the superellipsoids is random, things changed from the
first version, i have to try some differend random seeds to get it better again.
Comments welcome of course.
Christoph
--
Christoph Hormann <chr### [at] gmxde>
Homepage: http://www.schunter.etc.tu-bs.de/~chris/
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'sq_warp_02.jpg' (87 KB)
Preview of image 'sq_warp_02.jpg'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Whats that red glob? - could we see the same scene with the camera pointing the
other way?
--
Bye
Pabs
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Pabs wrote:
>
> Whats that red glob? - could we see the same scene with the camera pointing
> the other way?
It's a pyramid of red superellipsoids right behind the camera position,
distorted by the curved surface of the superellipsoid. (see attached pict)
Maybe i should try to rotate the reflective superellipsoid 45 degrees...
Christoph
--
Christoph Hormann <chr### [at] gmxde>
Homepage: http://www.schunter.etc.tu-bs.de/~chris/
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'sq_warp_02a.jpg' (26 KB)
Preview of image 'sq_warp_02a.jpg'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Christoph Hormann wrote:
> Pabs wrote:
> > Whats that red glob? - could we see the same scene with the camera pointing
> > the other way?
> It's a pyramid of red superellipsoids right behind the camera position,
> distorted by the curved surface of the superellipsoid. (see attached pict)
Ahhhh.
From what I saw in the reflection in the first image I expected more of a wall
behind the red blocks but it must just be the reflection off the block that made
me think that.
--
Bye
Pabs
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Why's the entire back wall all look the same? Just checked, same as the first one.
Very cool scene! Architecturally it's kinda like some sort of Aztec temple or
something...
--
David Fontaine <dav### [at] faricynet> ICQ 55354965
My raytracing gallery: http://davidf.faricy.net/
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Christoph Hormann wrote:
>
> Here comes the second version, now with reflective texture and some other
> changes.
>
> Because the textuing of the superellipsoids is random, things changed from the
> first version, i have to try some differend random seeds to get it better again.
>
> Comments welcome of course.
<n,n> for the shape where n is any positive value.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Soothing... I like.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
David Fontaine wrote:
>
> Why's the entire back wall all look the same? Just checked, same as the first > one.
I thought it would be better than all the walls the same style.
>
> Very cool scene! Architecturally it's kinda like some sort of Aztec temple or
> something...
>
Thanks, although it's not what i thought of when doing it (in fact i have no
idea what i thought at all :-).
Christoph
--
Christoph Hormann <chr### [at] gmxde>
Homepage: http://www.schunter.etc.tu-bs.de/~chris/
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Matt Giwer wrote:
>
> <n,n> for the shape where n is any positive value.
Sorry, maybe i did not get the point, but i don't understand the purpose of that
sentence (from the pict it should be quite visible that i understand how the
superellipsoid shape works ;-)
Christoph
--
Christoph Hormann <chr### [at] gmxde>
Homepage: http://www.schunter.etc.tu-bs.de/~chris/
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
It'd be great to see a Tardis reflected in the reflective
one there.
--
Cheers
Steve email mailto:ste### [at] zeroppsuklinuxnet
%HAV-A-NICEDAY Error not enough coffee 0 pps.
web http://www.zeropps.uklinux.net/
or http://start.at/zero-pps
2:08am up 16 days, 3:29, 2 users, load average: 1.10, 1.06, 1.01
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |